|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:31 PM Original message |
Does it strike anyone but me as counterproductive that there are 6 threads on the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. not any stranger than the usual six threads about this candidate or that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Maybe that's why Senator Kerry wanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I was brought up to hold my representatives accountable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikefutbol254 (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 03:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Correct me if I'm wrong but I've always thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Everyone is human |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. So glad MLK, Ghandi, Jesus, Rosa Parks, His Holiness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Porcupine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. You tell 'em. We knew the war was a scam in 2001. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 11:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. You marched against the war in 2001! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Porcupine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 07:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
51. Afghanistan was a mistake too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. I think it's about seperating the wheat from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
47. right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
9. of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Maybe you think they are "high and mighty" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. respecting people's opinions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:07 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Hey, Dave, where's your sense of humor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
42. no it just means they shouldn't lead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. even the best leaders make mistakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Do you understand the meaning of the word 'irony'?? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
43. I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 02:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
59. Purity tests make my teeth itch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:59 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. I'll bet they do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 05:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. Nah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
11. Considering that it was a largely symbolic vote engineered to smear Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:23 AM Response to Reply #11 |
30. A war resolution is hardly "symbolic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. It was NOT a declaration of war, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. what carefully defined options? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. It authorized the enforcement of weapons inspections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. show me that in the resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. "Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. it authorizes force FOR THE PURPOSE of enforcing UN resolutions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
57. UNSC resolution enforcement section is utterly meaningless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 02:34 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Has Bush supplied such determinations to Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 05:41 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Yes I know what he was required to do, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Okay. We have a figleaf pursuant to a figleaf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zodiak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. I'd just like to add that we are talking about a war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
16. Not to me, it doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
19. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
20. Now there are seven. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
21. Is yours Number 6 or Number 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
22. Most people are very wrong about it as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Don't try your crazy voodoo logic talk here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:20 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. WilliamPitt put it well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Thanks for digging that up! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
46. Nice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:18 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. someone who "voted for the war" disagrees with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Well, shit. Somebody needs to tell Edwards he isn't helping. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. we'll settle this in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 07:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. Who do you think will win? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 09:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. as far as I'm concerned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. No, it means that so many people think it was a vote for the war... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. More of that logic!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. shh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #22 |
56. It was a vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
23. Let me guess which user posted all of them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. IT WASN'T ME!! I only posted one of them!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
35. Excuse me - is there a war going on? Are we talking candidates? Irrelevant indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
talk hard (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:19 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. dude --- dont ya know war is no big whoop for these people ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
41. it is being used as a litmus test for 2008 presidential candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
48. Geez.........why didn`t I think of this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
50. Only 6 today? Must be a slow day because of the holiday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
53. Its THE litmus test for '08 - and rightfully so! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeremyWestenn (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
55. I feel you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
58. Hell no! IWR IS one of the most significant issues for '08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 06:01 PM Response to Reply #58 |
70. I'm sorry, but Clark is not among the anti-IWR group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xkenx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Dr.F., you lurk on all posts even tangentially related to Clark, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
61. If Dem Senators recruited consultants from the ranks of DU, how long would they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:54 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. That's funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
65. I think it is time to move on. We cannot change the past, but we can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC