Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox lies about control of the Senate (Updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BobcatJH Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 10:51 AM
Original message
Fox lies about control of the Senate (Updated)
Edited on Thu Jan-04-07 11:19 AM by BobcatJH
When is the majority not the majority? When Fox News is doing the reporting, of course!

Flipping through the coverage this morning of the new day in Congress, I had the unfortunate opportunity of catching a snippet of Fox News. There, an in-studio host (E.D. Hill) was speaking to a Washington correspondent, Brian Wilson, about the Democratic control of Congress. After laughably lamenting the fact that the now-in-charge Democrats appeared to be casting bipartisanship aside, talk turned to the U.S. Senate.

Wilson repeatedly termed the state of the Senate's control at 51-50 with the Democrats in charge. Unless we've added a state while I wasn't looking, that's a flat-out lie. Even the lower-third graphic at the bottom of the screen called the Senate as it is, 51-49 Democrats. Yet that didn't stop Wilson from lying through his teeth.

Then, talk turned to the health of Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson, recovering from recent brain surgery. Like vultures, both Hill and Wilson speculated what would happen were Johnson unable to perform his duties (the correspondent went so far as to say that, as he had heard, the senator was still unable to speak). But even temporarily without Johnson, control of the Senate still rests with the Democrats, 50-49. Not, as our friends at Fox said, a 50-50 tie with Vice President Cheney casting a deciding vote.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I doubt it (and feel free to set the record straight). I mean, what's more likely? Me being wrong about who's really in charge of the Senate, or Fox lying to its viewers? All signs point to the latter.

UPDATE: It's happened again, during a new report during the 11 o'clock hour. This isn't a fluke; it's a new talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. not lying, just ignorant.
that applies to 50% of Faux Gnus. The other 50% knows better but still lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. don't you mean the other 51% LOL
sorry.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fake News is filled with such arrogant and liars, I can't bear to watch them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, I think they're just being stupid, not lying...
but if Johnson were to -- God forbid a thousand times over -- resign or pass on, the Senate would be 50-50, because the Republican governor of South Dakota would appoint a Republican replacement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCantiGOP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. not 50-50 this year
Once the Senate is organized today (along a 51-49 split) it will stay that way for two years unless the Senate votes to re-organize. If a Democratic Senator were to die and be replaced by a Republican, the Democrats would never agree to re-organize, and the Republicans wouldn't be able to get a 60 vote margin to cut off a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. They're getting 50 by adding in Dick Cheney
Even though he's only supposed to break ties.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. They're trying to count Cheney I guess.
Silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. The program you were watching is called Fox & Friends
These guys are the worst. They have no journalistic ability. They are just talking heads that are so ignorant that I think about banging my head against the wall every time I hear them. It's all about the Fox philosophy: "Let's put the dumbest people we can find into our shows so that they will keep our dumb audience enthralled". Not even the "soap opera" industry has thought of this one. They throw in a blonde every now & to keep the really dumb males engaged in their propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Try Media Matters
They watch Faux Snooze so we don't have to.

http://mediamatters.org/

I don't want you to suffer like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. better yet
try www.newshounds.us They do the best job at watching Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. My special Fox & Fiends graphic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-04-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. The 101st Senator represents the great state
of denial, Fox News neocon shills inhabit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC