Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Supreme Court refuses to hear Nader's appeal of Pa. ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 01:13 AM
Original message
AP: Supreme Court refuses to hear Nader's appeal of Pa. ruling
Posted on Mon, Jan. 08, 2007

Supreme Court refuses to hear Nader's appeal of Pa. ruling
Associated Press

HARRISBURG, Pa. - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a Pennsylvania court ruling
that requires former independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader and his running mate
to pay more than $80,000 for costs incurred by a group who challenged their nominating
papers in the 2004 general election.

The nation's highest court declined Nader's and Peter Miguel Camejo's petition for a review
of a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling. In August, the state Supreme Court upheld a lower
court decision requiring the candidates to pay transcription and stenography costs and
handwriting-expert fees that the voters' group incurred in its successful challenge.

The lower court disqualified nearly two-thirds of the 51,000 signatures the Nader campaign
submitted, barring his and Camejo's names from being included on the statewide ballot. It cited
widespread evidence of fraud, including signatures from "Mickey Mouse," "Fred Flintstone" and
thousands of supposed voters whose names had been randomly created.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/politics/16411623.htm

Also: Scotus In Brief - AP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can only hope that Ralph is too old to keep fighting. Once, a long time ago,
I honestly think he was a good guy, but he's gotten to be a self centered radical who doesn't care about anything but himself anymore. I hope this fine will be enough to make him finally retire into oblivion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stranger Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-09-07 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. bye ralph!
I think he labored for so long in the vineyards that he finally decided
he deserved to have some fun and run for president.
But unfoirtunately, he siphoned off 80,000 votes in fla which put
a malevolent moron in the whitehouse, and now look where we are.

his 2000 antics have all but destroyed all the many things he did.

thanks Ralph, and sayonara
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC