Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LEAHY INTRODUCES WAR PROFITEERING ACT 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:53 PM
Original message
LEAHY INTRODUCES WAR PROFITEERING ACT 2007
LEAHY INTRODUCES WAR PROFITEERING PREVENTION ACT 2007

...Thank You Senator Leahy!

Soon after the American people booted the GOP from Congress in the midterm elections, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) spoke at his alma mater, Georgetown Law School, and talked about, amongst many other pressing issues to come before his Senate Judiciary Committee, war profiteers.

And because prosecuting criminal cases against war profiteering is difficult under current law and has to overcome jurisdictional legal defenses, we also will renew our efforts to enact the War Profiteering Prevention Act. I have repeatedly offered this bill, and it has passed the Senate, only to die in a Republican-controlled conference committee.

On January 4, the first day of the new Democratic Congress, Senator Leahy made good on those words when he introduced the War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007. The legislation group of bills includes the Effective Corruptions Prosecutions Act of 2007.


(Read his remarks on war profiteering prevention and on effective prosecutions.)


Here's what it will do:

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/06/leahy-introduces-war-profiteering-prevention-act-of-2007/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeeessssssssssss!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. KBR insider tells about plans for Iran at a DU post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. ....
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can anyone think of a War Profiteer who might benefit?
from a Senator Leahy intervention?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Senator Leahy
might get some payback for Cheney the Dick's "go fuck yourself".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is this Leahy's way of telling Cheney . . ,
"Go fuck yourself"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dear Senator Leahy,
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. This would stop the war faster than a draft. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yep, Kennedy, Leahy, Feingold, Pelosi, OBama, Johnson, Edwards..
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 01:18 AM by Tellurian
Pose a huge threat to the WH agenda..

TRIPLE UP ON PERSONAL SECURITY...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Those sumbitches tried to kill him. Now they pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. It all sounds great except for the fact that Bush* will veto it and there aren't the
votes needed to override a veto. Bush* has to be removed from office. That is the only way the madness will stop..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Betacha now Cheney's thinking Leahy is REALLY a son of a bitch, eh?
Brilliant move, Senator. Stick it to the bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Guess he'll think twice before telling a Senator to Eff Off again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Go get these f*ckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. For those who say impeachment would stop government work,
here is the perfect refutation.

Committees and their chairmen will continue doing what they do best. Legislation for all the various issues, while the House Judicial works on impeachment.

See how it all comes together?

REally, it all works, just as the Founders intended it to.

No worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. I couldn't be prouder of our Senator.
Go get the bush bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I'm Proud of him too, AB
And thankful, he had the good sense early on, to get this Bill rolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. PHEW!
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. My only reservation
and its not relly a reservation, only a consideration about language (a la Frank Luntz) is don't go giving these guys a ground to claim that we are in a "declared" war. I can just hear them hollering that we are admiting that we are at war and that in a war the president can do .....

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. How will the Bush family make any money?
They should make the law retroactive to the start of the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. By creating more war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. it's a start ... much more is needed ...
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 01:20 AM by welshTerrier2
overcharging, inflated prices, fraud, billing for work never done - that's real fraud and Leahy's legislation will be devastating to the bad guys when it's enacted ... a big kudos to those from my favorite state!

but let's make sure we don't lose sight of the real profiteering and of the real crimes and of the systemic corruption that this legislation, at least based on my quick read, doesn't really address ... we didn't go to Iraq so that Halliburton could overcharge the army for a bunch of meals they never served ... we didn't go to war so that Bechtel could lay roads 5 inches thick instead of 8 inches and skim a few extra bucks off good old Uncle Sam ... these are real and serious crimes and i applaud Leahy's focus on them ... and they are crimes that resulted in the theft of billions of dollars ... Leahy's legislation is a good start ...

but what is far more important, at least to me, is understanding the deep greed that led to this war in the first place ... oil companies have profited to the tune of billions ... but it is not the obvious crimes like just raising prices without justification or sneaking coolaid into the gasoline they sell ... the "profiteering" would appear to be all very legal ... put succinctly, and there have been numerous articles on this subject, the record profits Big Oil has made since the invasion of Iraq have been due largely to a destabilized Middle East ... more uncertainty = higher prices ... one could make a very legitimate case, if you didn't look beyond the market forces, that no crime or excess profits were made ... that's what i see as not addressed in Leahy's legislation ... the market became unstable, risk increased, profits increased ... so where's the crime?

but indeed, the real crimes went much deeper than unwarranted price hikes ... the whole reason for the war was to destabilize the oil markets and produce the kind of profits we've seen ... the whole reason for the war was to gain control of Iraq's oil ... that was THE PRIZE in all of this ... and that was THE CRIME ... the more important crime was not the excess profits themselves or the "legal contracts" that will deprive Iraq of its oil revenues but rather it was going to war in the first place to fulfill Big Oil's greedy objectives ...

the lesson is very simple ... Big Oil should not be able to retain any profits it's made during the conduct of the war and it should be forced to void all contracts it's made for Iraqi oil ... if the mouse gets to keep its cheese, surely it will go looking for more ... until Big Oil is stripped of its ill-gotten gains, we will surely have another war and another and another and another ... the crime is not just the profits themselves; the crime is the corruption of our government which went to war to help its greedy friends obtain them while we footed the bill and our military gave their lives and their limbs and their families ... but we must go beyond this ... we have got to do whatever is necessary to return real power to the American people and strip power away from corporations that have controlled foreign policy for their own greedy interests for far too long ...

so, a big "YES" to Leahy's first step on war profiteering; but let's remember that the next step, the more important step really, is to ensure that war profiteers carry no influence in the halls of the people's government ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Well Stated, welshTerrier2
if you will (for me).. please read the sister thread I posted here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=3103069&mesg_id=3103069

and if you could, post any suggestions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. In ref to your response...
Have you sent a recommendation to Sen. Leahy?
I believe an addendum can be added before passage by himself or another senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
38. I agree. It's a start. If the text is too wishy-washy it will be meaningless.
It also need to have some sort of retroactive bite to it to prosecute the crimes already committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
19. !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. This is encouraging! Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nickname should be the Haliburton Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Great action by Leahy - go after the corrupt and the profiteers. Flush out the Dems
and the Republicans who would dare oppose this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Great news. Good to see this congress working!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. This will go a long way
toward preventing this kind of madness in the future.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. kicked
for the War Profiteering Prevention Act 2007

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. AK...
you find the cutest graphics..

MOOOOOOh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. Right On
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. This is GREAT. Gets right to the heart of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. Bout time - it's been a week
Go get 'em Pat. Hang 'em high and fine 'em big!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. rurallib.. Ilike the way you think!
get a rope..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. kick
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
40. About time....eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Ted Nancy Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
41. Who will they imprison?
Will it be the officers and directors? Won't they will claim that the company is legally "a person" and should be subject to the penalty.

Congress can't make it retroactive because there can't be an ex post facto law.

Also, a million dollar fine seems kind of paltry, considering the amount of fraud that is alleged to have occurred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. This would be for the opening salvo..
Remember Skilling and Lay?

After they prove conspiracy, via the Secret Energy Meetings, the non bid Halliburton Contracts, the Betchel contracts. They have the RICO Act to prosecute. Never mind government officials aiding and abetting committing sedition, profiteering, treason...the list could go on and on..

They will have to warehouse political war criminals at camps designated for political disobedience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
43. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC