Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cunningham and Ney will get taxpayer-funded pensions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 10:27 AM
Original message
Cunningham and Ney will get taxpayer-funded pensions
Anyone else tired of so-called "reform" legislation that is utterly toothless?

So the House passes a "reform" bill that says convicted lawmakers cannot collect a taxpayer-funded pension UNLESS they've already been convicted, in which case they're still eligible, oh, and if they are convicted once this bill is signed into law, they personally cannot collect the pension, BUT, their families can if they can demonstrate a need for it.

One has to shake one's head. Congress sure can take care of themselves, can't they?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/23/AR2007012300890.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. the silver spoon crowd . . .
. . . knows how to look after itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is NOT toothless, it simply is not retro-active
That's because making a law retro-active has legal problems. Not to mention, think how it could be misused. Doesn't it appear Kafkaesqe to thing of the possibility of retroactive laws. You do something and then after the fact the penalties or even the legality itself changes.

The people who wrote the bill (Kerry in the Senate) did so because he was outraged. Making future occurances - and there will be some - have this penalty has merit. Would you want to keep it the way it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Must disagree.
I'm outraged, too, and this is where I see the toothlessness:

A convicted member of Congress cannot directly collect the pension, but his/her spouse can... so, said member leaves prison... the next day his/her spouse applies for the pension.... what's the difference?

Toothless. However noble the intention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC