Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IOWA POLL: Edwards on top, Hillary in fourth place ... Ghouliani leads field of pukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:01 PM
Original message
IOWA POLL: Edwards on top, Hillary in fourth place ... Ghouliani leads field of pukes
Below are the results of a three-day poll in the state of Iowa. Results are based on telephone interviews with 600 likely Republican cacus goers and 600 likely Democratic cacus goers, aged 18+, and conducted January 19-21, 2007. The margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

1. If the 2008 Republican presidential caucus were held today between, Sam Brownback, Jim Gilmore, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, Chuck Hagel, Mike Huckabee, Duncan Hunter, John McCain, George Pataki, Mitt Romney, Tom Tancredo, and Tommy Thompson for whom would you vote? (Republicans Only; Names Rotated)
Rudy Giuliani 25%
John McCain 21%
Newt Gingrich 13%
Mitt Romney 8%
Chuck Hagel 7%
Tommy Thompson 2%
Tom Tancredo 2%
Sam Brownback 2%
Mike Huckabee 1%
George Pataki 1%
Jim Gilmore 1%
Duncan Hunter 1%
Undecided 16%

2. Do you see President George W. Bush as a conservative Republican in the mode of Ronald Reagan? (Republicans Only)
Yes 11%
No 77%
Undecided 12%

3. If the 2008 Democratic presidential caucus were held today between, Joe Biden, Wesley Clark, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, John Kerry, Dennis Kucinich, Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, and Tom Vilsack, for whom would you vote? (Democrats Only; Names Rotated)
John Edwards 25%
Barack Obama 17%
Tom Vilsack 16%
Hillary Clinton 15%
Joe Biden 4%
John Kerry 3%
Wesley Clark 2%
Bill Richardson 1%
Chris Dodd 1%
Dennis Kucinich 1%
Undecided 15%

4. When making your selection for a presidential candidate, what are you looking for most in the candidate, charisma, experience, or ideology? (Democrats Only)
Charisma 29%
Ideology 21%
Experience 16%
Undecided 34%

http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/iowa_poll_012407.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go Edwards!
Yesssssssss!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Strategic Vision is a Republican polling company
Take their poll with a grain of salt. However, I'm not sure if their polls are meant to be as biased in primaries, as I'm not sure if they have a horse in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I doubt if they'd like Edwards, but I think Kerry is the one they fear the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Polls Shmolls
I give this about a 3 out of 10 on the importancemeter.

Living in Iowa, I constantly hear "isn't hillary running" or "isn't our governor running". These types of reactions are usually followed by assurances that they have voted and plan to in 08, but it surely doesn't mean they are planning to vote for either of them.

In fact, it seems like the average joe on the street really doesn't know about half of the so-called field right now. Obama? Most of the city folk know him. Edwards? Everybody remembers him from last time. But who the hell knows Dodd? Most regular folk don't even know Biden, even if they really should.

Name recognition doesn't mean votes, and I think people who respond to phone surveys are probably going on mostly name recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. if there looking for charisma that will go to Obama and Edwards
Clinton doesn't have it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes yes yes go edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Please update this every single day until the Iowa caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Guiliani
Wait till he dresses in drag again......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good God - inexperience must be popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, that depends on what you mean by experience.
The only one on the list who has no "experience" at winning elections is only pulling 2%...

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ironic, isn't it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Experience would have gotten you Hoover over FDR.
And FDR's charisma and committment to helping people on the bottom saved America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. pretty sad that charisma ranks so high
in which case I'm glad Obama is running ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. sad and disgusting....
Charisma?!?! is the highest ranking of what folks want in a Presidrential candidate? No wonder this country has problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Charisma may equate with "leadership", a word not offered in the poll,
and an intangible that people might characterize as charisma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. or maybe
"smells good" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. That is a pretty disingenous header
Yes Hillary is technically in fourth but she, Obama, and Vilsack are statistically tied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Charisma? When did Democrats ever care about charisma?
I'm not saying we haven't had charismatic leaders, but our guys have the charisma that comes with substance, not with a touchy-feely message. My hang up with Edwards & Obama is that I can see the charm and still can't see the message. Mrs Clinton is at least demonstrably a wonk. I'd vote for any of them if they're nominated. Just being Democrats they'll have better policies. But this charisma hokum is pure truthiness, and its for the birds. The elephant birds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Charisma.....29%--We will really be in serious trouble
in this country if that is the main criteria.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think the Iowans are leaning towards charisma out of shrewdness, not shallowness -
For politically active people in Iowa, the quadrennial caucus season must be fascinating. They're old pros, they know and meet the candidates, and they're trying to pick a winner for their own Democratic Party, for the Party they love. THEY realize that for the nationwide general election electorate, charisma and everything that means - all those shallow good-hair type issues - MATTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. hucks
I saw huckabee on Daily show - he's a funny guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC