Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How will the Democratic Congress RESPOND to an Iranian "Gulf of Tonkin" incident?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:09 PM
Original message
How will the Democratic Congress RESPOND to an Iranian "Gulf of Tonkin" incident?
Edited on Wed Jan-24-07 04:28 PM by charles t



1. . . The Bush/Cheney Administration would appear to be setting the stage for a wider mideast war involving an attack on Iran.


2. . . Chuck Hagel reveals that before the administration adopted the line that they already had congressional approval for an unlimited war against any nation even BEFORE the IWR of 2002, Bush attempted unsucessfully to have the Iraq War Resolution apply to ALL of the Middle East, including Iran.


3. . . Ron Paul predicts a possible "Gulf of Tonkin" incident regarding Iran:



"The truth is that Iran, like Iraq, is a third-world nation without a significant military. Nothing in history hints that she is likely to invade a neighboring country, let alone America or Israel. I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin- type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran."

"Escalation in the Middle East", January 15, 2007




4. . . Wesley Clark tells Fox News that the White House is dangerously "laying the groundwork" for war with Iran.


5. . . Antiballistic Patriot missiles are moving into place, despite lacking tactical or strategic value in fighting Iraqi insurgents.


6. . . A second Naval strike force is on the way.


7. . . The president asserts he needs no congressional authorization to attack Iran, defending this position variously by either stating that:

- - - - A. Bush has unlimited authority under radical "unitary executive" constitutional theory as interpreted by John Yoo, OR, alternatively, that

- - - - B. unlimited authority was granted by Congress in a 2002 resolution which predated the Iraq War Resolution (essentially taking the position that the Iraq War Resolution was a convenient & symbolic act of cheerleading, rather than a constitutional process), OR,

- - - - C. Both of the above. (Take your pick, Alberto!)


8. . . And President Bush demonstrates nothing to indicate he will change his addiction to reponding to political set-backs by upping the ante, and doubling his bets.



. . . . . . .



So the question remains:



How will the Democratic "leadership" (and the newly enlightened Republican defectors) respond to an Iranian "Gulf of Tonkin" incident?
















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does anyone have an idea of how much longer before the stage is set? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I fear we know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. They'll fall for it.
The msm will whip up enough war frenzy that they'll fall right in line like they did after 911.

I hope I'm wrong but I don't think I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. how can they 'respond' to events that will have already happened?
i doubt there will be any time for them to do so, this is simply gonna happen because bush knows he can't give them any time to stop him legislatively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Byron Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary and the mainstream Democrats will fall in line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emald Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. they will all vote for war because the profits are good for the country
don't you know. clinton, the senator not the sex addict, voted for this mess and seems unconcerned about ending it. she might have stocks in defense, almost certainly does. Profit allows for much sin to be overlooked. War with Iran is inevitable because there is just too much profit in it. Greed is destroying the us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC