NH: SurveyUSA...Hillary ahead of Obama and Edwards by 15%

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=a74585b7-563e-438d-af1d-08de962ef7c4

Hillary 40%
Obama 25%
Edwards 23%

On the Dark Side

Guiliani 33%
McCain 32%
Romney 21%


I think McCain is sinking fast!!!

She indicated that the bush administration had better clean up the Iraq mess before he leaves office

My question is, why shouldn't the Senate REPEAL the IWR, reinstate the war powers act, and in 60 days have the Iraq issue brought before them for review, where they can either declare war, or get us out

This war did NOT happen in a vacuum, and because of the neglect of Congress they shifted their responsibility to the executive branch. If they were doing their job they would take that responsibility back

1. Saddam is gone
2. There are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq
3. Iraq has an elected government

What is the definition of winning in Iraq, and why doesn't anyone comment on it?

Incidently, it doesn't matter whether we have the votes to reverse the IWR or not, it is important that this statement be made.

The 2006 election told Congress in no uncertain terms to do something about it. If they don't try, then they are part of the problem

http://zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=6437

Howard Dean has opened a daunting lead in the Democratic presidential contest in New Hampshire, says a poll released Wednesday night.

Dean was at 42 percent, 30 points ahead of his closest rival, John Kerry, in the Zogby poll of voters who say they're likely to vote in the Jan. 27 primary. One in five, 19 percent, were undecided.

Dean had a lead of more than 20 points in several other recent polls, including a Zogby poll in October.

Kerry, a Massachusetts senator who led in the state early this year, was at 12 percent; retired Gen. Wesley Clark was at 9 percent and Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman was at 7 percent.

...(12/4/2003)


MORE...
http://zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=6437

Sometimes they are, sometimes they are not...just shows where we are now...

The media will hype it up, but in my view they are hardly representative of the whole country. Unfortunately, the inane media hypes their credibility up more than it deserves

Thanks for posting....

Yawn.

:evilgrin:

look, this one is basically all a matter of name recognition; you would
have to go to mongolia to find someone that hasn't heard of hillary, edwards
was on the last national ticket, and obama has gotten media exposure to die
for over the past few months.

recognize it for what it is, but also recognize it for what it could lead to.

(edit for grammar)

However, post any polls that show her in anything but first place and a collective DU orgasm ensues!

That would be the best choice they can make...If the policies are bad, he may as well be entertaining. :)

I don't think he'll be the nominee, but to say he's sinking fast defies reality.

Of course, he's not running yet.

Re-Elect President Al Gore!

Obama/Clark vs Romney/and Some other Asshole, followed by an Obama/Clark victory in the general election.

Sorry, Elmer, Hillary would make a fine president, but I think Obama will be stealing the show soon.

Though I think that is the less likely scenario...I think Clinton/Clark is more likely

I wouldn't think twice about supporting an Obama/Clark ticket if thats the way the party decides to go though.

I've always said Obama would be President someday, I just don't think it will be this cycle, and I have always been impressed with Clark...particularly his grasp of the issues, but also his maturity in recognizing and acknowledging the strong points in arguments for policies he opposes...he has a knack for being able to take the opposite position from fellow Democrats, without making it personal or denigrating the person taking that opposite position...

really makes a lot of sense ... it shores up that National Security thing quite nicely

hmmmmmmmmm ....

Link here http://newhampshire08.com/ look at the top right margin

Let's take a poll after the debate;that's the poll I want to see
I'll go out on a strong limb and say the debate will be critical for all who have thus far announced because you never get a second chance to make a first impression

Expectations game is huge for that event

So the first debate in NH will be widely watched and then debates not really focused on until closer till the election (NH primary)

Top 3 will be under intense microscope and the rest should realize what a benefit this early debate is to them

:grr:

Check back in a year.

Something tells that Giuliani might win at least 2 Northeastern states, with his handful of liberal social positions.

Plus McCain has been more proactive in continuing the disaster that is the Iraq war.