Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not 21,000 troops .... try ... oh ..... 48,000.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 09:03 PM
Original message
Not 21,000 troops .... try ... oh ..... 48,000.
The good old San Jose Mercury News has the story. Click their logo.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/16600747.htm

Surge could cost triple Bush projection, CBO says

By James Rosen

McClatchy Newspapers

(MCT)

WASHINGTON - President Bush's decision to send more American troops to Iraq could cost as much as $10 billion this year, nearly triple the initial $3.2 billion price tag that Bush aides placed on the surge, the Congressional Budget Office said Thursday,

If the additional troops remain in Iraq for more than a year, the CBO said, the cost could rise as high as $29 billion. And under traditional staging formulas, the added combat troops could require up to 28,000 support personnel, at a cost of another $12 billion through next year.

"Thus far, the Department of Defense has identified only combat units for deployment," the CBO said. "However, U.S. military operations also require substantial support forces, including personnel to staff headquarters, serve as military police and provide communications, contracting, engineering, intelligence, medical and other services."

The Pentagon says it can undertake the surge with a smaller support contingent.

~~snip~~


What will it take for our fellow citizens to rise up, grab the torches and pitchforks, and head to the town square? This fucker is lying to us and laughing at us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just think how many Blackwater jobs the "surge" is creating
:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal renegade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. 6 weeks
6 months, 1 or 1.5 bil, no american casualties. This administration is nothing but lies and half truths, never the whole story....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another thing they are not saying is those being deployed...
now will be there for 18-24 months. This is what my nephew was told when he got his orders for deployment to Iraq. He will be leaving Fort Benning, GA and will be deployed to Iraq March 1, 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. So if the military reports are accurate and they said they could
really only support sending barely 21,000 troops how the hell are they going to send 40 plus....

He is breaking the military right before our eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. They have lied
or to put it charitably, been wrong, about every projected cost, and every estimate, and every prediction they have made to date. Why should we believe them now? They lie every time they speak, and we should stop pretending that anything they say should be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing to see here--feed the public more Nov 08 polling numbers, Wolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC