Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's wrong with "eloquent"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 11:55 PM
Original message
What's wrong with "eloquent"?
In one of the Biden threads a DUer said he/she got slammed for saying Obama was "eloquent." While I agree calling any professional with advanced schooling "articulate" is a backhanded compliment, what's wrong with saying Obama is an eloquent speaker? Being articulate means that you can be understood and put your point across. All people above a certain age should be articulate (however I do feel Chimpy and text messaging has lowered the bar on this somewhat). But eloquence moves people, it makes them listen ever so closely to the speaker's message. It also makes them remember what was said because it involved their emotions. They didn't only hear the message, they felt it.
Why would any politician, unless they were anti-education no-nothings, *not* wish to be eloquent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Got me.
Maybe people think it's too "gay". (And I'm gay, so I can say that.) But in my book, there are very few speakers who can claim "eloquence" - and Obama is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Both eloquent and articulate is something rare among politicians in general
I really don't know how to describe Sen. Obama's gift for speaking and words and not feel like I'm being a racist after this. I always thought in terms of politicians as a whole and not in the sense of "for an african american"
I just find most politicians very lacking the very skill they should be good at and that is public speaking. To have a politician with that skill and to take to the heights of excellence but, not be able to describe in fear of being thought racist is confusing. How do I describe this gift? How do I express my admiration for this person's ability with language and public speaking which I find so lacking in most of our politicians (Hillary is especially lacking here)and not offend??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. When I saw Hil speak back in '92 in Salt Lake
she was very articulate. She also had alot of fire. I don't think her problem is so much that she is not articulate, but that she has had too much coaching and isn't what she used to be. But she was not eloquent. Bill can be eloquent at times though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. sometimes consultants and image makers take the personality out.
the spontanious part and the whole of the person. I think you can be too consulted and too handled. Sometimes it;s better to just be yourself. It's a pity that whatever her personality could have naturally grown into was scrubbed out long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. When Bill was elected, I was excited about Hilary
as a first lady. But yes, when she went out on her own she was handled and Schumered and DLC'd to death. The Hilary that I saw in Salt Lake City at the Capitol Building is no more, or else she's buried under all that handling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, I much prefer "eloquent" to "articulate"
Edited on Fri Feb-02-07 12:19 AM by beaconess
Eloquence describes a superior speaking ability. Most politicians are articulate. Few are truly eloquent.

Calling someone articulate has always seemed a little bizarre to me, especially when describing a well-educated person. Whenever I hear Colin Powell or Barack Obama or Condi Rice described as "articulate," I want to scream, "YOU'RE DAMNED RIGHT THEY'RE ARTICULATE!!! THEY ARE HIGHLY EDUCATED PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN SPEAKING IN PUBLIC FOR YEARS. WHY WOULDN'T THEY BE ARTICULATE, YOU ASS?!"

Eloquence is another level and, in my view, much better describes Obama's speaking abiliy - and doesn't contain the hidden insult that suggests that somehow it is exceptional for a black person to be able to ar-ti-cu-late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The exception is Chimpy
He has an advanced degree but you'd never know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You're right - but the fact that he's inarticulate is considered remarkable given his background and
education. If he were articulate, it would be considered a given. On the other hand, blacks with the same level of education are praised for being "articulate" as if it's unusual for a black person to be able to string words and sentences together in a coherent way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. I love eloquent politicians
A good speech is inspiring and graceful - something I enjoy very much. Will even tape the good ones to watch again.
Chimpy is missing too many marbles to even be aware of the power of a good speech. He thinks he was crowned and he has no need to be anything for anyone.

As Robert Penn Warren wrote:

Until you remember, suprisingly, that
common men have done good deeds.

Until it grows on you that, at least,
God has allowed the grandeur of certain utterances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Pretty eloquent for someone from Kansas
I mean no disrespect to folks in Kansas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well I grew up in W. PA and went to school there
So if you're disrespecting anyone it's them. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Being an eloquent speaker is a plus
Edited on Fri Feb-02-07 09:16 AM by karynnj
It allows the speaker to transcend the specific issues and articulate a vision or a broader truth. That it is a plus is demonstrated by the support that Obama has. Much of that support comes from what many people saw in his speech at Kerry's convention and in susequent speeches.

As to Biden's comment, what I find strange is that, if anything, a dispropotionate number of black politicians or leaders speak with incredible eloquence. Think of the truely inspiring speeches in the last 50 years - they have to include MLK (I have a dream), Jesse Jackson( he had the best speech at one of Clinton's conventions), and Obama's.

Also, consider that Clinton was given a very positive compliment that he was able to speak like a black preacher. The root of that compliment was the understood admiration of the passionate eloquence that is the norm of the best preachers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC