|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:04 AM Original message |
Edwards blames Clinton for his Iraq vote! Ooookkkkeeeey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. Hey, he's smooooth! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
160. This whole thread is mostly BS following misquoting of Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #160 |
171. I like that he was upfront about raising taxes on those making over $200K to pay for healthcare plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #171 |
238. I wrote his website contact asking if he supported HR676/1200 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #160 |
230. this OP is worse than BS, it is a conscious untruth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. He is starting to look pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
261. transcript here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Bill, Hillary, Chelsea ?? Come on - inquiring minds need to know! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:02 AM Response to Reply #3 |
55. Maybe he's referring to the DLC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
237. Socks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #237 |
282. Yes, damn that cat! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. ...but then he takes responsibility for his vote. Good for him. (?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Unlike Hillary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Did he mention sponsoring the IWR? Took responsibility for THAT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #32 |
169. I also doubt he noted that he was the only Democrat in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #169 |
209. circa Flip Wilson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #209 |
229. Geraldine!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #229 |
235. goldfish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
6. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
7. Translation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. They all miss the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
8. transcript? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. sorry - not usually avaiable until after the show is over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:13 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. How about a quote or context? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. not unless I can go back in time 15 minutes... but.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. What if it's true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:27 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. poow wittle Edwards - bad Hillary fooled him! Vote for him to pay her back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Did he refer to Bill or Hil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
23. So he tried to verify with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
47. "clinton's people"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
9. The Evil Elf is nullifying Edwards which is why mtp and Tim will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
14. Sorry, that just cost major respect points from me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Ya see what I mean? MTP has a function. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. Don't worry, I'll still support the guy if he's nominated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
115. You mean.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #115 |
128. I mean Elf asks Dem's a whole different batch of questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
15. Did he just imply Obama lacks the depth and maturity to be President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Probably. Not the first time he did that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Did everyone notice how Elf asked about withdrawal of troops... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
28. I had Edwards on my short list until today's MTP - he is a smooth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. THAT was very well put. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
37. Yup. That was my prediction too. See # 26 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #28 |
41. What if it's TRUE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #41 |
52. What ifs don't mean a damn thing to me. If a bullfrog had wings it could fly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #52 |
61. He opposed it?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #41 |
60. What, exactly, would be their motivation for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Tough on Defense Dems - it's the DLC blueprint n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:21 AM Response to Reply #62 |
69. It's the blueprint for Democrats, but not the new left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #62 |
71. And wasn't Clinton part of the DLC when the PNAC asked him to invade Iraq? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #71 |
80. He was being impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
96. Impeached? By the people who wanted him to invade Iraq. Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. The public knew all this?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. You said their motivation for all this was being "tough on defense Dems" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:41 PM Response to Reply #103 |
109. 9/11 and Hillary's Presidential ambitions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #109 |
111. Sorry, I don't believe either of them are the type of people who would kill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. Have they confronted the Cheney controlled CIA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #111 |
158. I agree that it is Bush's war - but Clintons siding with Bush on the military decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #158 |
166. So, this is all about Kerry then? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #166 |
170. I was speaking for myself. Clintons DID side with Bush's DECISION to go to war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Miss Chybil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:27 PM Response to Reply #170 |
208. If I remember right, Kerry voted for the IWR, too . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #208 |
219. Kerry was against the DECISION to go to war. He supported IWR for weapon inspections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #219 |
243. he supported a resolution that abdicated war-declaring powers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #243 |
268. Funny how they go silent when it's right there in black and white for them to read. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #219 |
267. Just as I thoughT. Kerry's decision to support the War was totally innocent. HAHAHAHA!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #166 |
186. what isn't about kerry ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:59 AM Response to Reply #186 |
242. slam dunk post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #186 |
248. Advise me on an anti-corruption leader to support who's done more than Kerry , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #248 |
250. you will have to explain to me what a "pro-corruption leader" is first. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #250 |
252. One who ignores, denies and cover ups for entrenched powerstructure (BushInc) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #252 |
263. ah, yes. I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #263 |
269. Nope - anti-corruption included Joe Moakley, Henry Gonzalez, Henry Waxman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:04 PM Response to Reply #269 |
272. inconvenient that none of them are running for the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #272 |
278. I happened to notice that YOU wouldn't name another anti-corruption Democrat, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #278 |
279. that's because I think ALL democrats are, for all intents and purposes, "anti-corruption". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #28 |
86. I'm drifting away from Edwards a bit, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:04 PM Original message |
"This is mother's milk to KKKarl and John Edwards just offered up a tit." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
108. No, you'll only hear that at DU. It's a LIE. HE DID NOT SAY THAT. This whole thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #108 |
121. I thought these statements by Edwards had been made recently, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #121 |
179. Oh, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #179 |
182. Pretty safe with that, aren't you. Though, mercifully, not as safe as the prospect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #182 |
196. Sadly, you are correct in one aspect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #196 |
220. Well, I'm afraid you have a crippling literacy problem. Clark is held in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #220 |
231. Really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:04 AM Response to Reply #231 |
244. wowie wow wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #231 |
275. In a word, No. Very far from it. But your accusation vindicates my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
178. New malady: The iwisdabas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:43 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. He said that very recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
17. Very interesting that Russert let this comment pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:30 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. You know how timmy loves the Clintons, non? It may become a soundbite yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
22. Let's see: Edwards sponsored IWR (and a Joementum amendment) and insisted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #22 |
54. Not only that but he admitted ignoring the NIE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
188. "Who has more responsitbility (sic) here?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
29. Bill. clarified in post 4. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
30. What? Did he say he was FOOLED into voting for the IWR by Clinton? Someone please explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #30 |
39. He stated that the information he got from this administration was wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #39 |
74. So he's saying that he was an idiot and relied on intelligence that was YEARS old? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:11 PM Response to Reply #74 |
155. Edwards was on the Senate Select Intelligence Committee with Bob Graham who voted no on the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
152. Pathetic. He's a politician of the worst sort. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
33. The other funny aspect - Bill made it clear that Saddam had no WMDs, power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. No. He. Did. Not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. so this still proves Edwards might be a touch dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Because they leaned towards the WMD fears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #40 |
58. Sorry but entire statement is bull shit. Your opinion does not translate into facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #58 |
89. She supported WAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #40 |
67. sorry. Show me a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #67 |
87. OMFG - this is unbelievable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
123. HRC's statement says no such thing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #123 |
127. Aw geez, read the whole thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #127 |
134. You consider that statement to be a "Gung-Ho call to War"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #134 |
140. 30 posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. It is irrelevant to your point of misrepresenting HRC's statement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #141 |
149. No it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #134 |
156. For real. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #87 |
164. that link doesn't say "Bill Clinton did not know when he left office." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:23 AM Response to Reply #87 |
239. "If we were to attack Iraq now....it would set a precedent that would come back to haunt us" Hill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #40 |
120. I see the disappoited kerry contingent crusade against the Clintons at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #120 |
131. Here's what he said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
34. What Am I Missing Here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
35. Ooooh boy! Can't wait for this transcript, finally!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
36. We'll have to raise taxes ,when was the last time you heard that kind of honesty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #36 |
214. Walter Mondale said he would raise taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
43. He said or implied no such thing. Keep up the DLC's work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. I'm not the only person in this thread that heard it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. He EMPHATICALLY took FULL repsonsibility for his vote - with NO fudging. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. which I've also stated in this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #50 |
65. And Hillary said there are no do-overs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
119. How about hos sponsorship of IWR? Any responsibility for that one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:57 AM Response to Reply #119 |
241. Give it a break or we will have to drag out what Clark said in 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #43 |
81. Ok, I missed this part of the interview |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:19 PM Response to Reply #81 |
181. Well, Julie, the fact that many here believe Edwards panders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #43 |
180. Edwards IS DLC, so I'm confused. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
44. Bill Clinton WAS telling Senators that they should vote for IWR based on what HE knew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. What he KNEW, or FEARED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #44 |
49. Clinton's people always said they believed, based on the intelligence they had, that Iraq had WMD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. correct. And further, with very few exceptions, Clinton's people said "WMD PROGRAMS"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #51 |
64. Which helped confuse the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. sorry. Show me a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #66 |
84. Oh hell no, you provide your anti-war links n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #84 |
249. my anti-war links to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:09 AM Response to Reply #49 |
56. True - but Clinton PROVIDED THE COVER and helped bring in the Dem senators votes that Bush wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. an ex-president providing cover to sitting senators? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #49 |
63. Sorry. Provide a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #44 |
57. so what? (even if it is true) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:19 AM Response to Reply #57 |
68. Clinton left office but had the access to classified papers that no Senator had. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #68 |
70. why pretend anything you say these days is true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. National Security Archivesand actual EVENTS back me up - Clinton apologistitis fuels your replies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:25 AM Response to Reply #72 |
73. So, present us with some of those National Security Archives and actual EVENTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #73 |
77. I am sure it will be the same collection of links . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:35 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. The best one used for this type of propaganda is "I heard it on Larry King!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:37 AM Original message |
my dog told me . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #79 |
95. Clinton's LKL interviews didn't count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #73 |
82. You say I lie about everything - which event did I lie about that you want proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:40 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. that isn't what wyldwolf said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. He said that anything I said is untrue - I replied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #91 |
173. "National Security Archivesand actual EVENTS back me up" True? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #73 |
83. Clinton - the anti-war hero???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #83 |
174. did you reply to the wrong post of have your super bowl festivities started early? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #72 |
75. your unbridled and irrational hatred of the clintons just amazes me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. I used to be YOU. Then I read Clinton's book and I KNOW he was untruthful in matters that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #78 |
88. you were never me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #88 |
93. If you read my first 5 years at DU or bartcop or MWO before I read Clinton's book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #93 |
172. but you NEVER give any solid proof of what you claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #172 |
176. If you haven't read Clinton's book, and you refuse to accept Robert Parry as a source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #176 |
177. I have read Clinton's book. As so many here have nicely pointed out to you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #177 |
189. Baloney - Robert Parry became a nonreporter WHEN? And you can't explain Clinton's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #189 |
192. 'tell ya what, blm. Let's pull every post where you've made the claim... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #192 |
194. Lost the debate in your fantasy. Answer the question posed - you never do because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #194 |
198. well, if you call winning the debate being less than honest about "Clinton's Book" and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #198 |
202. Then show me where Clinton describes dealing with BCCI and CIA drugrunning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #202 |
205. bring his book by the house and we'll explore those parts together... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #205 |
207. My claim about Clinton's book is that he avoided all mention of BCCI and CIA drugrunning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 06:32 AM Response to Reply #207 |
246. but you always present this vast conspiracy theory, then scream, "read his book." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:32 AM Response to Reply #246 |
253. Not writing one word about BCCI and his apparent inaction on it as Pres. speaks for itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #253 |
254. ...maybe because there was no case for him to make on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #254 |
255. And why would that be? Marc Rich's involvement was 1 of the 20 OUTSTANDING matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #255 |
256. I dunno. Maybe because it had been settled? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #256 |
258. It wasn't settled. That list came out in late 1992, and there was no way Bush1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #258 |
260. had there been trials and pardons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #260 |
262. only on a minor peripheral matter in NY state. Robert Mueller was the US attorney assigned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #262 |
264. so... evidence only supported a state trial? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #264 |
265. NO WAY - Mueller WOULDN'T indict because he's BFEE thug. You think he's FBI director |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #265 |
271. ooh. More unsubstantiated claims to make your puzzle pieces fit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #271 |
273. It's useless to try and get someone to understand BCCI who has an interest in NOT UNDERSTANDING it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #273 |
274. about as useless as it is to get someone like you to understand the difference in facts and theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #274 |
276. You don't even KNOW the most BASIC facts about BCCI so you are no judge about what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #276 |
280. ...but I know the meme you're pushing is bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
76. I have a feeling that once I read the transcript, this entire thread will appear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #76 |
92. No transcript yet, but read this from Newsbusters. Wyldwolf got it right. Heard it, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:58 AM Response to Reply #92 |
94. "former Clinton administration officials" does NOT equal "Clinton" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #94 |
99. Am not sure of Edward's exact words, but do think he knew exactly what he was implying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #94 |
101. Edwards isn't the issue - the Clintons are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. I am not defending the Clintons, but Edwards seems to be shifting responsibility for his IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. He doesn't blame Bush's lies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. Sure he does. And NOTHING in the Russert interview = "blames Clinton" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #110 |
117. Sounds like we agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #110 |
118. He always said he wasn't misled by Bush. Even when "apologizing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #118 |
277. Quoting an October 13, 2003 interview with Edwards is disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hijinx87 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #101 |
184. Edwards' judgment isn't about Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
90. What about Feigold, Kennedy, & others.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #90 |
154. Thank you! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
97. Hmmm. How did Gore manage to know this War was a recipe for disaster then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #97 |
105. Brilliance!!!!!! Gore, should sued in to service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
98. I guess he decided to use a Republican tactic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
102. This Entire Thread is Just Too Funny!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #102 |
112. I AM KICKING THIS STUPID THREAD, JUST SO PEOPLE CAN READ YOUR COMMENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
104. Fucking idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #104 |
126. HE DIDN'T BLAME THE CLINTONS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #126 |
150. Maybe only 18 people think he did well. Some of them making a buck to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #126 |
175. OK, I get it,. My bad. "Clinton administration officials" is not the same as "Clinton." Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:32 PM Response to Reply #126 |
223. Stop yelling at me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
113. I don't care for Hillary.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #113 |
142. you are falling for the Rovian tactics of the anti-Edwards group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #142 |
147. There was only Edwards and Timmy on my teevee. No Rove. Edwards' words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #147 |
216. I'm referring to the fact that many on this thread say he is blaming Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #142 |
159. Well I'll have to find.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #142 |
187. This is somehow better--to favor former Clinton folks input over current intel, unlike Bob Graham? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #187 |
217. Edwards voted wrong, I've never said otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #187 |
218. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
116. Honesty is needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
122. That's just as pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
124. THIS THREAD IS SHAMEFUL AND FILLED WITH LIES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. I am PRAISING EDWARDS FOR THIS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. The Clinton people are not the Clintons- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. That was part of the Bush misinformation strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. So you choose to continue to confuse rather than clarify- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #135 |
138. Clintons have the credibility to clarify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #132 |
143. But Edwards maintained he was not mislead. At least not by Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #143 |
151. And he is wrong on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #125 |
148. You would. And attacking Iran. And sponsoring the IWR. he is sooo charming,non? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #148 |
153. More personal attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #153 |
161. Aren't you the queen of personal attacks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #161 |
183. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #183 |
193. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:06 PM Response to Reply #124 |
130. Misguided, but thought provoking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #124 |
133. Sad, isn't it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:23 PM Response to Reply #133 |
136. Any wonder why Kerry was unable to succeed in the last election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #136 |
145. Diebold? How did I do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silence Dogood (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. Very well, dear, Count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #145 |
215. Count, you just edited your post.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #133 |
139. Thats why he should be in prison, Misanthrope bastard that he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #133 |
185. We Duers are not afraid to vet our primary candidates. We do not march in lockstep like the R's! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #124 |
144. I Keep Following You Venable... You're Fighting The Fight I Want To! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #144 |
210. Yes - and there's a reason for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #210 |
232. OOkkkkeeeeeyyy.... I JUST NOW Watched What Edwards Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #144 |
213. Me TOO :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #144 |
221. No, other blogs don't blast like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #221 |
227. It has nothing to do with the VP thing, I can tell you that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #227 |
228. that sounds fair, but where does the vitriol come from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #228 |
233. Actually, they ARE argued against, complete with links, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #233 |
236. do you really want to suggest he is treated fairly when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #221 |
234. I Just Posted Something Before I Read Your Reply... Thanks, I Do Need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
137. I CALL BULLSHIT. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
157. Transcript now up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #157 |
163. OK, I get it,. My bad. Clinton administration officials is not the same as "Clinton." Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #163 |
165. Wyldwolf, I don't think it matters whether he said Clinton administration officials or Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #165 |
167. ...sadly, I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #167 |
206. Clever left handed strike at Hillary.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #167 |
225. I know you and I don't always agree, but I want to hug you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #165 |
222. not deflecting responsibility - telling how he came to his decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhombus (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
162. Lets just say we would never see a Clinton/Edwards ticket. Ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orpupilofnature57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #162 |
168. Petty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
190. Why is this so hard for some to believe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
191. No he didn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #191 |
195. so "Clinton administration officials" isn't the same as "Clinton?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #195 |
197. No FORMER Clinton administration officials aren't Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #197 |
199. ok.. As long as I know where you stand on it for future reference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 05:59 PM Response to Reply #199 |
200. Yeah I stand this way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:03 PM Response to Reply #200 |
201. I make no implications. Just to be clear on your stance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #201 |
203. for the most part yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #203 |
204. got it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
211. Well, Clinton was ok with it pretty much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
212. He didn't blame Clinton..he consulted with people in his Admin....and this is what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
224. I am not about to tolerate the dems blaming Clinton for everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
226. I remember Hillary thought there were WMD's in run-up to Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
240. Someone musta *made* him do it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
245. Got a direct quote for us --- rather than your personal gloss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:53 AM Response to Reply #245 |
251. read threads much lately? Direct quote for "us" already posted here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #251 |
281. Ya cain't back up yer claim with a quote? Well okie-dokie then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
247. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
257. This thread is complete and utter BULLSHIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
259. Edwards is talking out both sides of his mouth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
266. Hey, that's almost as funny as Clinton getting blamed for sabotaging Kerry! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
270. I was disappointed with Edwards' performance on Russert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC