Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq Resolution Typifies Rift in Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:21 AM
Original message
Iraq Resolution Typifies Rift in Senate
GOP Leader Won Battle on the Floor, but Perhaps Not in Court of Public Opinion
Since the new Congress convened, Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have emerged as the Senate's odd couple, the even-tempered McConnell hurling parliamentary brickbats at the quirky Reid with an even smile and a "Who, me?" shrug.

But though McConnell may be winning procedural battles -- on ethics legislation and a minimum-wage increase and by stopping a high-profile Iraq debate -- Reid, at least this past week, may have played the stronger hand on the war issue, on which public opinion is clearly on his side.

The drama started Monday evening, when McConnell rallied GOP senators to block from the Senate floor a nonbinding resolution opposing President Bush's plan to increase troops in Iraq. But since then, the headlines have been withering, blaming Republicans for sidetracking the debate. Rank-and-file Republican senators are grumbling and threatening to break with McConnell, as the much ballyhooed war debate has morphed into a procedural spat with the GOP playing defense.

"I'm very surprised how they handled this," Reid said of McConnell and his Republican leadership team. "It was so obvious. I just think they miscalculated. And it keeps getting worse."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/10/AR2007021001240.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Problem for Dems
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 04:52 AM by dmosh42
If the Dems can't plan of getting an act through, what happens to that bill Kennedy wanted, to prohibit any attack on Iran without congressional authorization? This resolution was, I believe, a test to see what kind of bipartisan support the Dems could get, knowing they need 60 votes for many types of resolutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thou shall not hinder the king's war.
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 07:54 AM by fasttense
McConnell doesn't mind our soldiers dying for nothing or the Iraq civilians destroying each other. It is all about an endless war and kissing crazy king george's a**.

"McConnell, who is married to Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao, is a staunch conservative who is regarded as one of President Bush's closest allies in Congress. He has vowed to do whatever he can to prevent Congress from passing a resolution criticizing Bush's war policies."

In McConnell speak this means - Do not criticize my king george.

"McConnell complained that the Democrats were denying Republicans a vote on alternative resolutions supportive of the war effort."

In McConnell speak this means - Everything my king does is wonderful and thou shall not hinder the king's war.

Edited for the heck of it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC