Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On sanctimonious, 'man of conscience' Holy Joe:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 08:58 AM
Original message
On sanctimonious, 'man of conscience' Holy Joe:
http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/02/23/pros-get-punkd-amateurs-come-through/


It doesn't take rocket science to figure out Joe Lieberman lied to Connecticut voters when he said during the election he wouldn't switch parties, or that "nobody wanted to bring the troops home" more than he did. Now of course he is threatening to switch parties on almost a daily basis (despite the fact that, as Gregg Sargent says, that's extremely unlikely — we're just not that lucky) and he's one of the biggest cheerleaders for the Iraq troop surge.

So why aren't journalists asking him about it?

Today in Hartford:

During an interview with the media a student interrupted to shout “No more Troops! Bring them home!” to which Lieberman replied: “I got the message.”

He said while a majority of the Democratic caucus does not support the increase in troops, “a majority of the members in both houses aren’t ready to cut off funding to the troops.” When asked if he understood a majority of the public didn’t support the troop increase Lieberman responded by saying, “Iraq is a bit more complicated.”

“I still think a majority of us would like to us succeed,” Lieberman said.

As the press was called off by Lieberman’s handlers, a Wesleyan student who had attended the “No Child Left Behind” discussion that brought Lieberman to Hartford Friday, asked him why he changed his stance on the war after the election.

Mike Pernick said during his campaign Lieberman promised to bring the troops home as soon as possible and now he supports a plan to increase troop levels. “It doesn’t make sense,” Pernick said.

To all the journalists who let Joe get away with this rot during the election — do you feel the least little bit guilty? Is there any shame involved, do you feel any shame that you got punk'd so badly? If there's some journalistic principle involved in maintaining this kabuki, or some big, mysterious payoff that all of us sitting here in the cheap seats just aren't privy to, please let us know. Because all we can see from here is that some kid is doing your job for you, and you look like a bunch of bought-and-paid-fors too timid to ask the obvious questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lieberman was very hawkish on the Iraq war before the 2006 election..
I don't see any change in stance. What that student said makes no sense at all. He must not have been paying attention before the election, because Holy Joe's position was very clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed. Lieberman has been very consistent. Although, I don't
remember the not-too-subtle threats to switch parties prior to the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC