Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Spokesman: Injured Vets ‘Can Go To Starbucks’ If They Want To Speak With The Media

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:57 PM
Original message
Army Spokesman: Injured Vets ‘Can Go To Starbucks’ If They Want To Speak With The Media
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/01/veterans-starbucks/

Army Spokesman: Injured Vets ‘Can Go To Starbucks’ If They Want To Speak With The Media

Yesterday, the Army Times reported that soldiers at Walter Reed say they have been told “they must not speak to the media.” Editor & Publisher reported subsequently that the military press crackdown was more widespread than Walter Reed, and that “many of the denials are apparently in reaction to the potential negativity of a planned story.”

In an interview with ThinkProgress, Army spokesman Paul Boyce insisted that the Army Times report is inaccurate, and that injured vets are “free to exercise their First Amendment right” and speak with the media. But upon further questioning, Boyce acknowledged that if patients at Walter Reed wanted to speak to reporters inside the hospital, they must first receive approval from the hospital’s press relations office.

What if reporters want to speak to a reporter without getting approval from a PR office? “They can go to Starbucks,” Boyce said. Asked whether this was a reasonable solution for patients recuperating from physical and mental trauma, Boyce said yes. “It’s just a short trip, and many of them want to get out anyway.”

Boyce repeatedly justified the restrictions on patients’ activities by citing the fact that Walter Reed hospital is a “government building.” ThinkProgress contacted several legal analysts and none of them could explain why this would justify media restrictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words: This hospital runs alot better when the patients are gone.
Damn them for showing up in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pathetic, isn't it. Big Brother doesn't like it when soldiers are honest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. This makes me want to puke!!!!!!!!
The Va killed my son,and then they lied to cover it up.He had to have his foot amputated and 6 more surgies before he died from their negligence.
When I called the Va in Boise where he had been I asked for all of his medical records to be sent to me and they first told me they couldnt find his file and when I insisted they said they would find his records and call me back.After I didnt hear from them in several days I called again and they said their attorney had his records so I contacted him and he said that he couldnt send them to me and I told him that if they were not in the mail in 2 days my lawyer would contact him and demand them or supoena them.Since the same lawyer already sued them for negligence and won I recieved his records in 3 days!!!!
They are all so rotten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, me, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm so sorry about this. How awful and rotten!
it is sick.

and on top of it, they aren't "allowed" free speech.....! Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. so freedom of speech is only for those that are able to get out and
go to Starbucks

anyone bedridden due to junior's felonious war is not entitled to free speech . . .

hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC