Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Delegitimizing Of Fox News Is The Biggest Story Of The Year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:49 PM
Original message
The Delegitimizing Of Fox News Is The Biggest Story Of The Year
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 12:45 AM by ruggerson
John Edwards and the Nevada Democratic Party have started in motion a process that may completely delegitimize Fox as a "news" outlet.

We have all known for years that Fox is nothing more than a propoganda arm of the Republican National Committee. The problem has been that Democrats have lent them credibility, and let them feign neutrality, by appearing on their shows and dealing with them as if they really were a responsible, non partisan, mainstream journalistic network.

If what John Edwards has started becomes a hurricane: if Democrats actually begin to stand their ground, and only deal with legitimate news services, the results will be catastrophic not only for Fox, but for Matt Drudge, Rush Limbaugh and the entire rightwing echo chamber. If Fox "News" is deprived of the ability to lay claim to any journalistic credibility, the far rightwing loses its most effective electronic font of propoganda.

And Roger Ailes is running very scared by these developments. It is his worst nightmare. That people finally begin to stand up and say, "You are not a news organization, sir. You are merely destructive, hyper-partisan propoganda."

Ailes today, in full damage control:


"Recently pressure groups are forcing candidates to conclude that the best strategy for journalists is divide and conquer, to only appear on those networks and venues that give them favorable coverage.

There's a long tradition of news organizations, national and local, sometimes together, sponsoring presidential and other candidate debates. The organizations and the panelists have been the objects of a lot of advice and even pressure as to how these debates should be conducted and what questions should be asked. This pressure has been successfully resisted, but it's being tried again this year with the added wrinkle that candidates are being asked to boycott debates because certain groups wants to approve the sponsoring organizations.

This pressure must be resisted as it has been in the past. Any candidate for high office of either party who believes he can blacklist any news organization is making a terrible mistake about journalists. And any candidate of either party who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters.

The public knows if a journalist's question is unfair. They also know if a candidate is impeding freedom of speech and free press. If you are afraid of journalists, how will you face the real dangers in the world?"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. And don't forget the Obama freeze of Fox a month ago. the dems are fighting back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. And it's LONG. PAST. TIME. I couldn't be more delighted!!!
This door swings BOTH ways (and when it does, it smacks 'em straight in the face).

Please remember: it's been a longstanding and (up til recently) successful strategy in this White House - to deny ACCESS to those who won't play ball, or threaten to do so.

If you don't behave, if you ask too many questions, if we don't like the tone of voice you use or the things you say or write, you won't get access to any of our people (and WE'VE got the big names everybody wants on their talk shows). If you make trouble, we'll freeze you out. And you need us if you're going to keep your jobs. No access - no viewer draw. No good interviews for your readers. They'll go where they can get all our stars. And you'll wither and die. Or we'll yank your press credentials so you can't even get in the door. And if that doesn't work, we'll start impugning your patriotism and get our other bully friends to do so, too, so you'll be marginalized and demonized and nobody will watch/listen to/read you anymore, and you'll shrivel up and die.

That's been their bully-tactic. And gee whiz, looks like the shoe's being shoved onto the other foot for a change! And ailes is whining and crying foul like the stuck pig he is. Hey, all's fair (and balanced) in love, war, and news coverage! Turnabout's fair play. If they're gonna dish it out, they better be prepared to take it.

I said somewhere else here, if ANY Dems or liberals or progressives think they can gain any ground on Pox Noise where the deck is SO deliberately stacked against them, they're kidding themselves. It WON'T get better. They have NO interest in any REAL fairness or balance. If any of our people do still want to trust them, they might as well walk around all over town with a big, bright, colorful "KICK ME" sign on their backs. I originally said it was like sleeping with the Devil. Except it's not LIKE sleeping with the Devil. It IS sleeping with the Devil.

I'm SO glad this is finally happening. I hope it continues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. nevada dems nix fox news: Du thread here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. Yup. Obama started this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Perhaps you are forgeting the Big Dogs slap down of Chris Wallace..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #52
62. Right you are. And Wes Clarks numerous smack downs of their toadies
It's been a building process that culminated with Ailes "joke" - how happy I am to see HIM instead of Kerry justifying his joke for a change....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. Thank you -- Obama was first out of the gate on this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Democrats can't very well give statements to and appear on Comedy Central's fake news programs
and also refuse to deal with FOX.

Fake news is fake news, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The difference is
Comedy shows are comedy shows. They use the "news program" format to mock it. Fox News sells itself as a "news organization" that tries to bring "objectivity" to the news media, when what it really does is to serve as a mouthpiece for the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. fox PRETENDS to be legitimate, comedy central does not nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Amen. Apples & oranges. If Fux called itself a 'comedy' channel, that would be different.
Maybe that's what we should do. Except it really, really isn't funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
59. if Fux called itself a neocon/neonazi propaganda channel, that would be different...
and wholly accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
53. "right after a show featuring crank-calling puppets"
not news by any stretch, though "many a truth expressed in jest"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Democrats CAN (very well) give statements to and appear on Comedy Central's COMEDIC variety shows ..
and refuse to appear on FAUX .....

There is no absolute commitment to appear on ANY show, nor to be balanced in an approach to media participation .....

John Edwards can pretty well appear wherever and whenever he wants to ....

Isnt freedom grand ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. That picture in your post gets my blood a-boilin'!
I will NEVER forget the stolen election that made so many disasters inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. No.
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 12:13 AM by Atman
There is absolutely no comparison between a 1/2 hour, self-acknowledged COMEDY news show, and a 24 hour networks which purports to be actually telling the truth in a "fair and balanced" manner. No comparison whatsoever.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. You are all irony deficient tonight
maybe tomorrow after coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. It's hard to catch your facial expressions and tone of voice when typed.
That's what the :sarcasm: is for. It wasn't technically "irony."

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Uh, The Daily Show is on COMEDY CENTAL
They have NO aspirations as a news outlet..... however it is interesting that TDS's viewers had more knowledge of world events than viewers of any other network (including NPR).



Bottom line - it's a Comedy show - ask Samantha Bee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Are there people here who actually don't get that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Yeah...#2 reply - KennyB Doessn't 'get it' it appears.
Some long time posters seem in the dark about reality at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
42. no
when Reagan did away with the Fairness Doctrine all rules went out the window. When gwb can just say "not going to talk about it" then anyone who wants can say "not going to talk to YOU" to anyone they want. i hope the bastards just dry up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. a long time coming
I believe they did it to themselves ... the rest of the planet is just acknowledging
what has long since been held to be true, that Faux News is a propaganda machine emanating
from one old man's bent point of view.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. And it is about bloody time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ailes is playing right into Edwards/Obama's hands by giving them the opportunity
to dispute the notion of 'journalism' practiced by FOX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
60. the question is, will they take it as far as it needs to go?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. ailes could be describing BUSH!!!
this is the bush modus operandi:

"Any candidate for high office of either party who believes he can blacklist any news organization is making a terrible mistake about journalists. And any candidate of either party who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters."

Msongs
www.msongs.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. They are neither news organization nor Journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. This following quote is also how the WH operates...
we've been told by journalists about how access is cut off if BushCo didn't like the reporting.

"Recently pressure groups are forcing candidates to conclude that the best strategy for journalists is divide and conquer, to only appear on those networks and venues that give them favorable coverage."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. This will, I suspect, if carried to its conclusion,
be the single most freedom making, good government creating, powerful process in the whole of taking back America.
More powerful, if that's possible, than most of the momentous events now extant in the unraveling of the rabid rightist corporate agenda.

How long I have vented fruitless frustration at the camera worshiping hordes of democratic politicians, especially those of the Biden ilk.

I promise to write, over the course of the next week, at least one hundred missives, praising the perspicacity of the forward thinkers advocating refusal to appear on the programs that represent destruction of sanity, integrity and decency.

Death to POX Noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Agreed, completely! I once heard it said or read it as a quote
from some expert whose name I forget - who pointed out that THE way to defeat your enemy is to start by targeting their communications.

BTW - everybody, if you can, first thing Monday morning, call your reps - Democrats preferred, and thank them for this. Whether they had any part in it or not. Whether they're anywhere near Nevada or not. Make sure they know this was a good thing, noticed, AND appreciated. Positive reinforcement goes a mighty long way! And it just might strengthen their backbones just that much more...

Please note the TOLL FREE Capitol Hill switchboard numbers conveniently located in my sig line below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Faux "journalists" are a joke. They are GOP smear machines
Ailes is one of them. Equating Obama with Osama is truly sick. He's sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. Hahaha! I can't believe Ailes used the word "Journalist" to described his hacks.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. Such dishonesty; I wonder if he is even aware
Conservatives are capable of such deep denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R! Will bump on Monday! Great point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. It is a big, important step forward! Terrific!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. How many of us would've dumped Fux a loooooong time ago?
Why'd it take this long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. This what eventually happens to those who embrace Fantasy and reject Reality
Sooner or later...the BS Detector goes OFF with Glaring/Blaring Signals...
and a CORRECTION Takes Place

A swing BACK to Reality/Common Sense/Sanity/Logic/Common Good.

FOX Played with Deception and now pay the Price....As Murphy would say "If there is a chance for Truth to WIN...sooner or Later, She will WIN...."

Truth 1.....FOX O

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. New York Times story rolling in ....

New York Times

Stung by Remarks, Nevada Democrats Cancel Debate on Fox

By KATE PHILLIPS
Published: March 10, 2007
WASHINGTON, March 9 — Citing comments made by the chairman of Fox News about Senator Barack Obama, and under pressure from liberal groups and blogs, Nevada Democrats announced on Friday night that they had decided to cancel a debate in August on Fox News.




Criticism had been mounting ever since the Aug. 14 debate for Democratic presidential candidates was announced last month. Liberal blogs and groups as well as some Nevada Democrats had demanded that Fox be removed as a sponsor, arguing that its coverage was slanted toward Republicans.


Continued - - http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/us/politics/10nevada.html

He he he - GOOD JOB! ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarySeven Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
30. Sorry, it was CLINTON who started it ...
when he told Chris Wallace to his face about the smirking bias behind the phrase "fair and balanced."

Poetic justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Everything Is Clinton's Fault.

But it does keep the focus off the truth.

"... It is difficult to define the concept of propaganda thoroughly and precisely. This is especially true since, in past decades, it was subject to unfavorable, and in part extraordinarily hostile, definitions, on the part of us Germans. First, then, we must defend it. Those abroad sometimes claim that in the past we Germans were particularly knowledgeable in this area, and knew how to apply it, but that unfortunately is not consistent with the facts. We learned the consequences of our neglect all too clearly during the World War. While the enemy states produced unprecedented atrocity propaganda aimed at Germany throughout the whole world, we did nothing and were completely defenseless against it. Only when enemy foreign propaganda had nearly won over the greater part even of the neutral states did the German government begin to sense the enormous power of propaganda. It was too late. Just as we were militarily and economically unprepared for the war, so also with propaganda. We lost the war in this area more than in any other.

The cleverest trick used in propaganda against Germany during the war was to accuse Germany of what our enemies themselves were doing. ..." J. Goebbels (http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb59.htm)

So let us keep the pressure on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. Nope--Howard Dean
"My view is that Fox News is a propaganda outlet of the Republican Party and that I don't comment on Fox News." June, 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
57. Thank you smoogatz - you know you've got a good thing going when everybody
wants to claim being the first. Not that it really matters, as long as everybody gets on board!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. fairly unbalanced
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
32. eamil/snail mail address here:



Fox News Channel
1211 Ave. of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 301-3000
Fax: (212) 301-4229
comments@foxnews.com

List of Email addresses for all Fox News Channel programs

Special Report with Brit Hume: Special@foxnews.com
FOX Report with Shepard Smith: Foxreport@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor: Oreilly@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes: Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com
On the Record with Greta: Ontherecord@foxnews.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. Democrats cancel Fox News debate (Reuters)



http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070310/pl_nm/campaign_debate_dc;_ylt=AoNLIUsfq7th3gKjXGy9eb_MWM0F

Democrats cancel Fox News debate

By Dan Whitcomb Fri Mar 9, 11:33 PM ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Nevada Democratic Party officials said on Friday they were canceling a presidential debate co-sponsored by Fox News, following a joke chairman Roger Ailes made about Democratic candidate Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record).

In a letter sent to Fox, Nevada State Democratic Party Chairman Tom Collins and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) said Ailes "went too far" with comments made the night before.

The letter makes no reference to a crusade by the liberal activist group MoveOn.org to boycott Fox, which it calls a "right-wing mouthpiece." Democratic presidential candidate
John Edwards dropped out of the debate on Thursday, citing in part Fox's participation.

The letter also does not specify which comments by Ailes lead to the decision, but a Democratic source told Reuters it was a joke Ailes made about Obama and
President Bush during a speech on Thursday night.

"We cannot, as good Democrats, put our party in a position to defend such comments," Collins and Reid said in the letter. "We take no pleasure in this, but it the only course of action."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
35. So long as FOX has an audience & profits,
it will stay and be in our face. Only bankruptcy delegitimizes
a news organization in real terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I disagree. News organizations are like money. They have worth only
because people believe in them. The less confidence in them, the less they are worth.

It is true economically as well. Less supporters equals less revenue from advertisers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. All Dems should boycott Fox Noise.
DU may consider not reporting anything said on Fox Noise, a total shunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
39. Howard said it first. At least among prominent Dems.
"My view is that Fox News is a propaganda outlet of the Republican Party and that I don't comment on Fox News." June, 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
41. I hope you are right. Harold Ford perhaps gnashing his teeth
right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
44. I have a dream
That Faux "News" will bankrupt themselves and go into history being known as the propaganda arm of the Republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
45. I think the Obama/Madrassa debacle really opened a few eyes
Even the big mainstream news organizations questioned that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
47. Dupe. nt
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 12:21 PM by quiet.american
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
49. The grotesque spinmaster doesn't get it.
Democrats aren't afraid of Fox Noise; they have correctly & finally decided not to recognize it as a legitimately unbiased news network that serves the interests of all political persuasions.

If Fox Noise's intent is to serve & protect only this neocon administration & their enabling lapdogs, then they shouldn't cry foul when those to whom they have persistently labeled "the unpatriotic enemy" decide that enough is enough, that Fox Noise doesn't deserve their respect of participating in any of their forums of distortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. John Edwards has been a FANTASTIC candidate so far.
He isn't my first choice. But if Obama and Hillary weren't running, Edwards would be a real force. They've been sucking a lot of the air out of the room, so to speak. John has been leading on a lot of issues--and he's led the effort against the right wing news apparatus, thus giving other candidates the cover they needed to bow out. Way to go JRE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
70. I agree.
John Edwards showed real leadership in his withdrawing from the Faux News debate. The "Cititcal Mass" of Faux News bullyism would not have happened without Edwards initiating his protest. As far as I know, Obama was going to participate, in spite of the Faux News "Hussein" smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. Ailes has no compunction about twisting "news" to fit his political agenda,
but has the gall to lecture on journalistic integrity. Fuck him. He is an enabler of Fascism and cares not for the moral integrity he falsely espouses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. "They also know if a candidate is impeding freedom of speech and free press."
BWHAHHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAAAAAA

fox news aren't 'journalists'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
55. Yup, Great Post! Welcome To The 21st Century You Propaganda Peddling Filthy Maggots!!
The old, broken media is being superceded, bypassed and discarded and I say good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stonebone Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
56. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
58. Like any Potential Democratic voter
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 04:48 PM by DearAbby
would be caught dead watching Faux Snooze...Democrats can lose without the help of fox. We don't need them, and Ailes knows this. They made their bed...lay in that shit, Roger.

No Democrat should ever darken the door of Fox. Totally freeze them out. Cheers to Obama being the first, following the Madrassa story. Cheers for Edwards for refusing this debate.

:applause:

On edit, read up thread that Dr.Dean was the first. I stand corrected with a cheer for the good Doctor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. whoa... a little confused... whaddaya mean "Democrats can lose without the help of fox..."???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. ooooooooooops my mistake
Wrong word...I am totally embarrassed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. faux has that effect on people... it's quite misunderstandable...
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
64. When they hire journalists at Fox News
then maybe somebody will want to answer their questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
65. or just call it what it really is:
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 07:03 PM by HappyWeasel
GOPTV.

Their slogan:

"The communists have CCTV, why can't we have GOPTV?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
67. Delegitimize, marginalize, direct traffic to truth.
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 08:13 PM by lonestarnot
I'd love to see them dropped like rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
68. Poor, poor Roger Ailes!
He was obviously salivating over the idea of that debate, and the chance to trash Dems directly.

Get over it, Ailes.. it's only going to get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
69. FOX has been slinging it far too long. It's absolutely GREAT to
see it brought into question and given a taste of 'No thanks' from our side.

I say keep up the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
71. Murdoch and Ailes wouldn't know a journalist
is she/he came up and bit their teeny weeny pencils. All these two know is propaganda and spin.

Let's put the screws to this corporation to the point of bankruptcy. I would love to see News Corp. trying to sell this subsidiary because it's a money loser. Hell...I'd like to see the entire enchillada up for sale at bargain basement prices!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
72. Actually, the beginning of the end of Fox began with the biggest story of LAST year
Edited on Sun Mar-11-07 12:57 AM by rocknation
the November election results. And don't overlook the role Obama's reaction to the madrassah smear played.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC