Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's a big fat DUH: Officials: Mohammed exaggerated claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 06:39 PM
Original message
Here's a big fat DUH: Officials: Mohammed exaggerated claims
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070315/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/terrorist_plots_3

Officials: Mohammed exaggerated claims

By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 38 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's claims that he was responsible for dozens of successful, foiled and imagined attacks in the past 15 years relies on a loose definition of the word "responsible." Officials say the 9/11 mastermind was key to some plots but a bit player in others.

The 31 on his list range from the stunningly vicious suicide hijackings of Sept. 11, 2001, to others that current and former government officials say were more talk than concrete plans, such as a plot to kill Jimmy Carter and other former U.S. presidents.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, noting Mohammed's activities are likely to be the subject of an upcoming military tribunal.

His confession, his first public statement since his March 2003 capture in Pakistan, came in a closed-door hearing in the newly established U.S. tribunal process. A 26-page transcript of the Saturday session at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was made public Wednesday night.

While there apparently is truth in much of the statement, several officials said, there's also an element of self-promotion. They view the claims as at least in part a rallying cry to bolster his image and that of al-Qaida in the only venue Mohammed has left: a military courtroom from which the public is barred.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'd say anything to stop the torture.
Because of the torture, we don't know what he really did.

Torture isn't the path to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush's little stunt to defect attention from Gonzales failed
All that happened were a flurry of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed jokes--like he was the father of Anne Nichole's baby, etc, which ran rampant here and on progressive talk radio. And then everyone went back to talking about Gonzales and the US Attorneys, with a side comment about how a person will say anything to stop torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Uh, no kiddin'?
This man supposedly confessed to everything nefarious from the Magna Carta and next week. This is so obviously a PITIFUL attempt to get the gonzales-US attorney firings off of the front page to anyone blind in one eye and unseeing in the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. How can he be convicted of anything if they rely on his confessions under torture? It's no wonder
that they want to deny these suspects due process, and try them in secrecy, etc., because they know that there would be difficulty proving their case. All their evidence will be tainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Even Colonel Klink wouldn't believe him
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 07:14 PM by CGowen




If he is still alive and exists.



KSM only said yes after his represantative read those 31 claims
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did he ever confess to
his reasons for tipping off the Secret Service that * was safe to set in a school during the whole attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. It'll eventually turn out that he was another one of the coffee boys (i.e. another A-Q#3)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did he exaggerate these claims?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,1284,788431,00.html

I don't believe Fouda tortured KSM here, and he doesn't sound like a "coffee boy" either.

And before you bring it up, yes, Fouda released inaccurate info on when the interviews took place, in order to protect his life. It doesn't make him a liar any more than protecting an anonymous source makes any journalist inaccurate. bin al-Shibh's arrest just after the broadcast of the interview still put his life in peril.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article131678.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC