Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush lashes out. And Leahy's response:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:54 PM
Original message
Bush lashes out. And Leahy's response:
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/03/20/bush-lashes-out/

Bush lashes out.

At a press conference moments ago:



“We will not go along with a partisan fishing expedition aimed at honorable public servants. The initial response by Democrats unfortunately shows some appear more interested in scoring political points than in learning the facts. It will be regrettable if they choose to head down the partisan road of issuing subpoenas and demanding show trials. And I have agreed to make key White House officials and documents available. I proposed a reasonable way to avoid an impasse, and I hope they don’t choose confrontation. I will oppose any attempts to subpoena White House officials.”

UPDATE: Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said, “I don’t accept offer. It is not constructive and it is not helpful to be telling the Senate how to do our investigation, or to prejudge its outcome. … Testimony should be on the record, and under oath. That’s the formula for true accountability.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good answer by Patrick Leahy. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Right on, Leahy!
:thumbsup: You tell him. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Right on

I was hoping the Dems wouldn't wimp out. I think Bushco is against the ropes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cabcere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They had better not wimp out.
This looks promising, though...keep your fingers crossed! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deepthought42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes! Go Leahy! Glad he caught the absence of the words "under oath".
Show no mercy! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Repukes wrote the book on partisan fishing
Now we'll use it against them
Boo FRICKEN HOO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. Not quite.
Their criteria was bullshit, these investigations are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #37
51. Exactly...
...and the difference is EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
48. Afriad the Dems might catch a big CRIMINAL fish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes .... You go Pat
Well I wont back down, no I wont back down
You can stand me up at the gates of hell
But I wont back down


Mother Fucker wants a fight ... well now is as good a time as any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep.
The Constitution, wielded mightily, will knock these losers on their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. They want a fight
Let us give em one. They fired the Attorneys because they were getting
close to exposing bush / Abramoff / Rove / Cheney / and others
CRIMINAL ACTIONS. End of story.

Democratic voter fraud was failed to be prosecuted so that is why they
had to fire some of the attorneys .... please what a line of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klyon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
62. The problem is that if it goes to the courts, it falls to the guy
appointed last summer to the First Circuit, a loyal Bushie, I think. Anyone know for sure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4nic8em Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Damn straight...
by god, it's time to throw down and stomp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
49. The courts
have been predicted to rule in our favor, with the obvious exceptions of Scalia, Thomas and Alito. The other jurists want to leave a legacy as bad as Bush. To condone the removal of prosecutors in this fashion, REPUBLICAN prosecutors no less, would be like them accepting the same fate for themselves. I pray they step the fuck up to the plate.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:57 PM
Original message
I hope Leahy et al. have all their legal ducks in a row.
They had better have been prepared for exactly this reaction and know what exactly they now have the power to do.

Backing down now would not be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Awwwwriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!
You go, Leahy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good! Only under oath testimony will be acceptable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. "honorable public servants" should be willing to testify under oath. Go Leahy
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. "Honerable Public Servants"
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
45. ONEROUS
public servants is more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
57. And Mark Antony
sarcastically referred to Caesar's killers as honorable men. All, all, honorable men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Two things I would like to know what he is talking about...
First...partisan "fishing" expedition.

A republican Attorney General, with the firing of republican attorneys for not prosecuting republican crooks. Sure is partisan.

And what honorable members of his staff is he talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Mr. Bush, if you have nothing to hide.....
I'd think you'd be more than happy to clear this up by having the principles in the case testify under oath. I'm SURE no one in your administration has done anything unconstitutional so if you have nothing to hide, what's the problem? :shrug:

I seem to remember a swarm of Republicans saying this exact same thing when it was revealed that the NSA was listening in on Americans' telephone calls, reading their e-mails etc. "If you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't be worried". Yep, those were their exact words. Now, I certainly hope they aren't proposing TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF RULES! Why, that would be the height of hypocrisy and as we all know, there isn't a hypocritical bone in the Republicans bodies. Right? :sarcasm:

So please, Mr. Bush: come clean and allow your toadies to testify UNDER OATH......IF you have nothing to hide. I won't be holding my breath. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwdeviant Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Damn it!
That's what I was thinking, but you said it better than I could have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
58. "Trust Me" vs accountability

Time for bush to quite running the country in total secrecy, this is suppose to be an open society.

Looks like the bushies are going to have to work for their paychecks and perks for a change since the Dems. are in control. I am enjoying this. Time for some explainin'.

The assertion by bush that he can fire his U.S. Attys. at will is faulty since the rule of thumb has been to dismiss your appointed U.S. Attys. for cause and has been used that way for a very long time. Proof is in the number of US Attys that have been dismissed in the last century.

Slipping "new rules" into the Patriot Act was a typical bush way of ignoring Congress in the appointment process.

Firing the Atty. that prosecuted the Cunningham case and then while she was preparing to prosecute others that were involved in the case is blatant corruption of the judicial system. Like Nixon firring all those attys. that were interfering with the way he was conducting his presidential powers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. someone should ask why * insists on "micromanaging" Congress. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Great headline for an article... I'd LOVE to see that....
AND ... great question to ask him DIRECTLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Accountability - the magic word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LEW Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't think Leahy would be saying this
if he didn't have his "ducks in a row".

These are not stupid people, look how far they have pushed shrub already; remember there were TWO press conferences today. Wouldn't have gotten this far unless they really had something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. They should get Senator Leahy
on the tube all over the place giving his answer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. What's the terra alert level?
Cue some *conian distraction.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. Short, sweet, pithy, and very, very POINTED
I like it.

And so damn true. Isn't it BRACING? Isn't it energizing to hear the truth?? Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. CHENEY (alias GWBush) versus LEAHY. . .
"I will oppose any attempts to subpoena White House officials.”

versus

". . .it is not helpful to be telling the Senate how to do our investigation, or to prejudge its outcome. … Testimony should be on the record, and

under oath.

That’s the formula for true accountability.”

Go get 'em, Senator Leahy.. .now we really know why Cheney said F*** you on the floor of the Senate because he knew you'd be the ONE HOUND DOG who's not GOING TO BACK AWAY!



You ole hooounddoog, you!




:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
61. It does appear Leahy has a way of getting under the skin of
the evil, arrogant one whose does no wrong. Leahy has had to deal with Orin, Hatch this is, for all these years on the judicial committee. Orin was overbearing and pious and Leahy put him in his place for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Here's the great litmus test: if Congress and its various Committees DO
NOT stand up and fight for SWORN and PUBLIC testimonies, then what faith remains for us? What HOPE should we invest in such officials? I can hardly withstand the anxiety this brings.

I watched * recite his lines; I saw the smirk, the hardly-veiled bully smirk as he threatened the democrats--and in my weakness, I so wished for a private audience for just a short while to..........enjoy ..........a ..............beer :beer: NOT!

What? C'mon, ya can't threaten th' bastid, e's th bloody *. Although, personally, I think he might look really well with a wired up face and all, but that's just my dysfunctional side acting out, I guess.:evilgrin:

NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. I LOVE the smell of desperation in the morning!
BOOYAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. Friggin unreal idiot!!
I cannot believe this asshole is the president of the United States!

Hi Sister :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I prefer to call him the Acting President...
...since I don't believe he has ever been legitimately elected to the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. Not a very good actor, though.
No Oscar for him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. And that is what we need, TRUE ACCOUNTABILITY! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. Coincidentally Cheeeney announces the SECOND heart prob also today...
Looks like he's preparing an early exit from Washington and Bush's problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. Remember - he's the Senator they tried to KILL!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yeeeehaawwwww!!!
Get the son of a bitch, Leahy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Good. This is progress.
Now if the acquiescent wing of the party will just shut up and quit looking at the polls for a few weeks, we might get a knockout blow out of this. Its gonna take some balls though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
35. Sen Leahy - '....the formula for true accountability.' - and TRUTH I might add
that's something that has been missing for 6 years in this country and once that curtain is raised way up on the Wizard and his band of Repukes the resultant shit-storm is going to be unlike anything this country has EVER seen.

Sen Leahy, Rep's Conyers and Waxman - please don't make accommodations in the spirit of bi-partisanship or any of that crap - THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NOT ONLY DESERVE THE TRUTH A GREAT NUMBER OF US ARE DEMANDING IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
59. This is The Wizard
Anyone in the Republican party using the moniker Wizard should be referred to as The Grand Wizard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. The Democrats had better not back down... I am sick and tired of the wimpiness
of the party over the last several years; yes, they were in the minority, but that doesn't mean you roll over and let them use you as a fuckin' doormat!

They MUST keep up the pressure, every one of them, all the time, each and every day, long and loudly, until all these unholy unqualified unelected liars and killers and thieves are GONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AshevilleGuy Donating Member (947 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
38. WHY isn't Leahy Majority Leader???? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. We have a darn good Senate Majority Leader who is allowing Leahy to do his job very well. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. My email to Leahy
Dear Senator Leahy,

After watching the Cowboy President on yesterday afternoon challenge the Democrats to not make the Attorney scandal partisan or use it for political gain -- I say, the Democrats BETTER go after this administration, subpeona Rove and Miers under oath, and please televise the proceedings.

We've had SIX LONG years of NO oversight whatsoever against these crooks. It's about time that someone starts looking into their dirty dealings.

If Bush doesn't like the two party system perhaps he should go to the UK, maybe Elizabeth can tap him to be the next Monarch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
64. Thanks, but no to the last suggestion
Bush would never cope with being a constitutional monarch - once defined as 'a highly paid model for a postage stamp'. He likes his power too much.

And we don't want him here!!! Most British people despise him.

Anyway, I'm glad that he's being investigated, and glad to see him squirm. I always thought Senator Leahy was a good man - after all, anyone who annoyed Cheney that much must be doing something right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
42. "Accountability" to this administration is as a cross is to a vampire.

But good for Sen. Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
43. I'm loving this!
Bush, the great uniter, says "I hope they don't choose confrontation."

Don't back down, Senator Leahy. America is counting on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
44. "Bring it on" Fredo
What a piece of shit, but I welcome the showdown as long as the Dems show up for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
46. bush has 5 aces in the hole
roberts
scalia
alito
thomas
kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
47. ho ho, ball is in JR's court NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
50. Leahy should have ended his statement with that famous quote from
the Big Dick..."Go fuck yourself".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. No, no, no
Leahy's known for being killingly polite yet scathing. It's a great combination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourvoicescount Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
52. This is getting juicy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
53. Bush is sounding more and more like Nixon during Watergate-- good.
backed into a corner, sticking to his guns and claiming political motives for his critics to misdirect from their obvious corruption. Problem is that Bush loaded SCOTUS will support him on executive privelige... will interesting to see how the Dems get around this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pattib Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Where is deep throat when we need him/her?
Step up mam/sir, you know you want to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. W needs to STOP IT with the whiney "partisan" bullshit
after the effing THOUSANDTH time he says it will people start to see it's bullshit? Well probably not since they elected his whiney little ass :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
60. Honorable public servants??? This is what the Oversight is supposed to find out. Are they Honorable?
Bush is resorting to stonewalling....Nixon tried that...failed miserably

Leahy is right on...he got spine....Bush got BS....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
63. Leahy was selected (1974) as one of three outstanding prosecutors in the United States.
Bush has an MBA though is a failure at every business venture he's ever embarked on.

No contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC