|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:38 PM Original message |
Today I was told "remove your T-shirt or remove yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillParkinson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's simple, really.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Got first amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
purduejake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. How is that a 1st amendment violation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Fine, it is their property. Where I have the problem is when you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. It's a construction site fer Dog's sake. There is no dress code, other than safety reqs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. We can wear them in our workplace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
32. Not a First Amendment issue. At all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Do they have a formal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Only as regards safety equipment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. You called all the right people, and they should all be interested |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Keep your shirt and prepare for a fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
purduejake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Careful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Yeah you're right of course and that was 40 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Actually, I am from the same generation. Grew up in S.F. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. if you have a copy of the union contract, check it for work rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohtransplant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. Actually wearing the flag as a piece of clothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
42. Yep - it violates the Federal Flag Code |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. Check your work rules, to see what it covers.but remember you are on PRIVATE PROPERTY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Like I said, If there was a job site policy forbidding political messages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Again it is Private Property and you will be disobeying a work rule of your employer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. One of the nice things about being a union member is that I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Good for you! And I hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
10. Maybe they were afraid of getting sued by milk..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. Depends who makes the request |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
purduejake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Especially if the request was illegal, you wouldnt go thru union reps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. I want that t-shirt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
26. When you do get into a situation like you did to remove your shirt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. Another thing you can do if you aren't already doing it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. For the most part, my union agrees with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Maybe your union could all wear shirts printed with something about 1st amendment rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morgana LaFey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. NOT FIrst Amendment -- 1st Amendment is about GOVT censorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sanskritwarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 01:33 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. It's bullshit about the shirt, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OffWithTheirHeads (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-03-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. God bless America, I am not even considered left of center |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Polemicist (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 05:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
36. You can always "change the subject"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyorDeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
35. Tell these semi retarded simpletons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
37. If you were working for a client... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Worst Username Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
38. The Bill of Rights does not apply to private entities/corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. But to threaten discipline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
39. Perhaps this qualifies as harrassment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-04-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
41. kinda like whining about a ref's call AFTER the game imo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC