Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Committee Reacts to Recess Appointment of Andrew Biggs to Social Security Administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 05:31 PM
Original message
National Committee Reacts to Recess Appointment of Andrew Biggs to Social Security Administration
Another recess appointment that will do more harm than good and is not getting enough attention.


Recess Abuse
President Bush makes an end run around the Senate.

*snip*

For instance, the recess appointment of Andrew Biggs as deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration eliminates any possibility of bipartisan cooperation on Social Security. The administration has a legitimate complaint that Mr. Biggs, an advocate of private accounts, wasn't given a hearing or vote in the Senate. But the recess appointment enraged -- as the administration knew it would -- Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), whose cooperation on Social Security changes would be critical.

*snip*

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/05/AR2007040501886.html


The position this man will hold is the position that sets policy for the SSA.


National Committee Reacts to Recess Appointment of Andrew Biggs to Social Security Administration

WASHINGTON, April 5 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- "Clearly,
President Bush knows no bounds when it comes to his obstinate pursuit of Social Security private accounts. The announcement of the recess appointment of privatization crusader Andrew Biggs as Deputy Commissioner of Social Security demonstrates that this President will flex any muscle and employ any strategy to put forward his ill-conceived plan to privatize Social Security," said Barbara B. Kennelly, President and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

Since November 2006, when the President first proposed Andrew Biggs for SSA Deputy Commissioner, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare has denounced the appointment. NCPSSM President and CEO Barbara B. Kennelly, a former Congresswoman and Counselor to the Commissioner of SSA, stated, "Andrew Biggs has built a career on creating strategies which would destroy Social Security and promoting the President's private accounts plans to achieve that goal. We believe Mr. Biggs is a partisan and political nominee presented at a time when we need just the opposite." Biggs, an assistant director at the conservative CATO Institute, has authored numerous papers and articles proposing private accounts as a way to shift seniors away from government retirement programs in favor of private markets. His contempt for Social Security was on record as early as 1999 when he wrote that Social Security should be "sent to the slaughterhouse."

"48 million Americans depend on Social Security each year. It is the nation's most successful and trusted government program. But with this recess appointment, the future of Social Security as we know it is truly at risk. The fox is in the henhouse and regrettably, our own President opened the door," said Mrs. Kennelly.

The National Committee, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the Board of Directors and professional staff. The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing better- informed citizens and voters.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20070405/pl_usnw/national_committee_reacts_to_recess_appointment_of_andrew_biggs_to_social_security_administration




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm adding this to yours for consolidation:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3201648&mesg_id=3201648

http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/3799

Bush Recess Appointment Threatens Public Protections

WASHINGTON, April 4, 2007—President George W. Bush today installed Susan Dudley as White House regulatory czar through a recess appointment. Dudley will now serve in the White House Office of Management and Budget as administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).

OIRA is a powerful office responsible for reviewing and approving federal agencies' most significant regulations. Installing Dudley threatens decades of public health and safety protections; doing so by recess appointment endangers our democratic process.

"Dudley's record is one of anti-regulatory extremism," said Rick Melberth, Director of Regulatory Policy at OMB Watch. "She has opposed some of our nation's most basic environmental, workplace safety and public health protections."

Dudley has falsely proclaimed ground-level ozone to be beneficial, opposed ergonomic standards to protect workers from repetitive stress disorders, and even suggested that airbags should never have been mandated in automobiles.

The kinds of rollbacks Dudley may push forward could render useless valuable federal laws that have saved countless American lives. OMB Watch and Public Citizen documented Dudley's anti-regulatory views in a September 2006 report, The Cost Is Too High: How Susan Dudley Threatens Public Protections.
http://www.ombwatch.org/regs/dudley/report

Dudley's strong ties with the industries she will be regulating pose an obvious conflict of interest. For the three years before her nomination, Dudley directed the Regulatory Studies program at the Mercatus Center — an industry-funded, anti-regulatory think tank. It is likely that industry executives will have unprecedented access to Dudley, while concerned citizens will be increasingly shut out.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have to ask, how long is it going to take to fix all of the damage this Jerk is doing?
Seriously, WTF? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. several decades
if that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-06-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That depends
on the competence and determination of the next president. I keep waiting for one of our candidates to say that house cleaning is at the top of their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC