Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Dept Looks Set to Fight Subpoenas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:02 PM
Original message
Justice Dept Looks Set to Fight Subpoenas
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002981.php

Justice Dept Looks Set to Fight Subpoenas
By Paul Kiel - April 10, 2007

Earlier today, House Democrats subpoenaed a host of Justice Department documents, saying that they'd tried everything else, but could reach no agreement. Well, it looks like the Justice Department will continue to fight.

From The Washington Post:

Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said, "We still hope and expect that we will be able to reach an accommodation with the Congress," but signaled that Justice will consider opposing the congressional demand.

"Much of the information that the Congress seeks pertains to individuals other than the U.S. attorneys who resigned," Roehrkasse said. "Furthermore, many of the documents Congress is now seeking have already been available to them for review. Because there are individual privacy interests implicated by publicly releasing this information, it is unfortunate the Congress would choose this option."


Legal experts said the standoff will likely end up in court unless the two sides reach agreement on a compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sorry, what's private about these people's positions?
I was under the impression that their salaries were paid by Congress and they work for the American People.

What did I misunderstand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. WE thought we were dealing with law abiding employees of the DOJ.........
BUT instead we have discovered we are dealing with MORE bushco criminals attempting a cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the part where if they break the law.....
the evidence conveniently becomes a matter of national security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, Bush intends to have his thugs in the judicial save his hide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is gonna get really nasty if bush/rove/gonzo go to the Supremes..
And let me guess who will appear "innocent" once the media is finished with it all.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. In this case the 'people' will ultimately decide, NOT the SCOTUS.
The 'peoples' decision will be rendered in the voting booth, November 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. While the republican-owned voting machine companies count the votes.
The people keep TRYING to render their decisions, but are blocked at every turn.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like the DOJ needs to be closed down
If it's fighting the peoples' subpoenas, time to dispense with this silly charade of being the legal
voice of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agreed
If THEY have nothing to hide, then of course what would the problem be???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
va4wilderness Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dep't of "Justice"?
Might do to lose the name. The word "justice" doesn't fit anymore.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Put those Regent U grads on this one...
Their faith shall set them free!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC