Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon (4/11): VA report found Walter Reed problems in 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:20 AM
Original message
Salon (4/11): VA report found Walter Reed problems in 2004
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/11/kussman/

VA report found Walter Reed problems in 2004

A task force learned nearly three years ago that wounded vets were unhappy with the hospital. So why does Bush want to promote the task force co-chair?

By Mark Benjamin


April 11, 2007 | WASHINGTON -- Bush administration officials have claimed that they were unaware of problems with veterans' care at Walter Reed Army Medical Center until a flurry of media reports earlier this year brought the hospital's shortcomings to their attention. But Salon has obtained written proof -- prepared for a Department of Veterans Affairs task force -- that officials should have been aware of the situation as long ago as August 2004. President Bush, meanwhile, having promised to improve care at the hospital, has just announce plans to nominate the co-chair of that task force to run all of the VA's health services.

In August 2004, VA researchers conducted focus group interviews with Walter Reed patients and their families. The report based on those interviews, and obtained by Salon, says that the patients -- seriously wounded veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan -- told the VA that they were "frustrated, confused, sometimes angry" about their experiences at the hospital. Documents provided to Salon show the focus group report was delivered to top VA officials in November 2004.

"I was in a wheelchair and they expected me to push myself all the way over to Building 11," says an anonymous soldier in the report. "One hand was in a bandage and one leg I couldn't use and they wanted me to push myself around the post ... It just became more of a hassle and my mom did it."

The report shows that top VA officials were involved in the focus group process back in 2004. Michael Kussman, then the acting deputy undersecretary for health, was co-chair of the VA's Seamless Transition Task Force, which produced the final report. The task force was supposed to make sure veterans had access to healthcare and got their benefits in a fair and timely fashion. Not only is Kussman still at the VA, but he is also in line to be promoted. On April 4, the White House announced that the president intends to nominate Kussman to be undersecretary for health at the VA.

In addition to being co-chair of the 2004 task force, Kussman was also the commander of Walter Reed in the late 1990s. Paul Sullivan, who until March 2006 was a project manager at the VA in charge of data on returning veterans, told Salon that Kussman's role troubles him. "Kussman knew in 2004 that Walter Reed was a disaster," fumed Sullivan, "and thousands and thousands of veterans have needlessly suffered long delays."

Sullivan questioned why the military and the VA apparently did not address these problems two and a half years ago. "The VA had clear and unambiguous warning that Walter Reed was a fiasco in 2004," Sullivan said. "There is no way they can say they did not know ... The question is, did they share this with the Department of Defense in 2004?"

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just like every other "scandal" (read: incompetence revealed) they have...
denied it

then they generally acted like dicks about it

then they claimed they had every right to do so because Bush said so and we are at war.

This one they got caught redhanded as well but they are denying that they were responsible by basically blaming the system and using it a means to privatize that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick, because this isn't right.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. pm kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC