Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Announcing a boycott of Tums antacids by Glaxo / Smith-Kline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:37 PM
Original message
Announcing a boycott of Tums antacids by Glaxo / Smith-Kline
Announcing a boycott of Tums antacids by Glaxo / Smith-Kline

I have decided to place this product under boycott and include it with the boycott of Pharmacy Chains Eckerd, CVS, Walgreens and Walmart.

Glaxo Smith Kline

US corporate switchboard:
+1 888 825 5249
US Customer Response Center:
+1 888 825 5249

Call Glaxo Smith Kline and tell someone in the public relations department that you will no longer buy Tums until their CEO gets congress to


1 to repeal Medicare Part D

2 repeal the means test for Medicare Part B

3 to enact a prescription drug benefit in Medicare Part B covering 80 percent of all medications
with no extra monthly premium, no extra annual deductible, no means test, no coverage gap,
and no late sign up penalties.

and that this bill passes the Senate and House and gets signed by the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, right. Another boycott, like "To Hell With Shell" in the 1970s, and the other dunderheaded
proposals about boycotting Exxon Mobil that were proposed here last year.

Good luck with this one, OK?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've been boycotting Exxon
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 09:23 PM by CountAllVotes
ever since the the Exxon Valdez "incident" (aka massive oil spill in Alaska that did much damage!).

I don't know if it helps or not but at least I still walk the talk and the Exxon Valdez wasn't yesterday either.

Redstone: Whatever ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ah, just so you know, the expression is "walk the walk," not "walk the talk." It comes from
the full saying: "You can talk the talk, but can you walk the walk?"

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep...we have too...all these years...and now we only buy CITGO
to support Chavez. Sometimes on a road trip we need gas in some out of the way place but we buy Shell over Exxon because usually there's a choice of one or the other in "outta the way" places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. No Citgo here
but I've been boycotting both Shell and Exxon for years. Shell is for another reason though. A friend of my late mother had a son that worked for them and was killed in an accident on the job (he worked for Shell Oil). She wouldn't buy from them after that and I never have either.

We all have our reasons whatever they may or may not be.

In my case, both are cases of extreme disgust.

CountAllVotes



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I never buy Exxon Shell or Moble and I try to refran from BP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And that changes exactly what? Just curious.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't buy gas from Exxon/Mobil
and I'm know they don't miss me as a customer,
but it makes ME feel better. My money. I decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. OK, if it makes you feel better, that's well enough for me. I don't supose that Wal-Mart misses
my patronage either, but I do feel virtuous somehow by not shopping there.

My negative comment was actually pointed to people who try to organize mass boycotts (which NEVER end up happening), rather than individual ones like yours or mine.

OK?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I only buy Citgo
so my money goes to Hugo Chavez and the people of Venezuela.

No Middle Eastern oil money for me. Why should I enrich the Saudis, the Iranians,
the Iraqis, the friends of Bush and Cheney? And no Lukoil - no money for Putin.

Fortunately there are two Citgo gas stations right nearby.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. It's one drop in the bucket but already there are two DU'ers on this post
who won't touch Exxon. So how many more folks are like that out there WHO WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID IN ALASKA and what they've NOT DONE to clean it all up.

It's just a small drop but it's principle of it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Oh, yeah, I agree with that. But jeez, trying to organize a boycott of TUMS? That's lunacy.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. "One Tum Today" and a Million Tums not selling...well...makes a
difference somewhere...or at least folks can hope so. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Except that it ain't gonna happen. This is the real world, and people are NOT going to react
to a "call to action to boycott TUMS."

Come on. It's just unrealistic, and you know it. And it makes the people who issue that "call to action" just look foolish.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. No Exxon, Shell, or BP for me either......
Citgo & occasionally Wilco Hess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. It seems quite odd
to boycott a random company because of the deficiencies the medicare system.

Congress does that stuff, not Glaxo.

Dammit, I'm not drinking Fresca until Congress gives me a pony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well, well, we find ourselves on the same side once again. These "Calls For Boycotts"
just seem to get sillier and sillier, don't they?

I mean, boycott Tums? What's next, boycott Kotex?

Spare me.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. well
the funniest part is that has zero chance of working. Are people REALLY going to unite as brothers and sisters to lead a worldwide boycott against Tums because of the arcane provisions of the Medicare laws?
No.

The OP and maybe one other person will join this boycott. And Glaxo will do fine without the $8 in annual Tums sales those two people would otherwise generate.

Personally, I'm boycotting Conde-Nast publications until the World Bank reduces debt obligations in Sub-Saharan Africa via a combination of loan-forgiveness, small-business incentives and direct aid, the actual details of which you can on my bumpersticker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Excuse me, I'd like to call those numbers, but I can't find "+" key on my phone.
Can you tell me where it is?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC