Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The country would have been much better off with President Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:02 AM
Original message
The country would have been much better off with President Kerry
The opponents of the act "have not demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.

The decision pitted the court's conservatives against its liberals, with President Bush's two appointees, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, siding with the majority.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia also were in the majority.

more


Wednesday, April 18, 2007

The Profound Effects of Justice O'Connor's Retirement

Marty Lederman

Back in July 2005, I posted to SCOTUSblog a list of precedents that were the most vulnerable in the wake of Justice O'Connor's retirement. The list is republished below. At the time, I wrote that the most important and most vulnerable of those precedents were in the areas of the Establishment Clause (especially the direct funding cases such as Mitchell v. Helms), affirmative action (and just watch what happens to Grutter later this Term), and abortion, where Stenberg v. Carhart was hanging by a thread. Today, the thread snapped, as a five-Justice majority upheld the federal "partial-birth abortion" prohibition.

In its decision today, the Court effectively overruled Stenberg's "undue burden" test for facial challenges to abortion-restriction statues (see pages 36-37 of the opinion).

(By the way: Justice Thomas in his concurrence suggests that he might have voted to invalidate the statute if a Commerce Clause challenge had been raised. In other words, if the Respondents had raised a Commerce Clause challenge, as well -- something they were wise not to do, not of least of which because statutes governing medical facilities plainly are valid Commerce legislation -- the Court might well have invalidated the statute, even though there would have been no majority of the Court for any particular ground of invalidation (a form of "Tidewater Transfer" disposition). That's not really very important, however, because the practical significance of today's case is not so much the fate of the federal statute itself as the evisceration of the Casey/Carhart undue burden test for facial challenges.)

more


Breaking: Supreme Court Upholds ‘Partial Birth’ Abortion Ban

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has upheld a nationwide ban on “partial birth” abortion, “marking a shift on the high-profile issue and underscoring the impact of President George W. Bush’s two high court appointments.”

<...>

UPDATE IV: The nation’s leading group of professionals providing health care for women, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, opposed this law because the banned procedure is often the best option for women:

The intact variant of D&E offers significant safety advantages over the non-intact method, including a reduced risk of catastrophic hemorrhage and life-threatening infection. These safety advantages are widely recognized by experts in the field of women’s health, authoritative medical texts, peer-reviewed studies, and the nation’s leading medical schools.


more


More tidbits:

04/16/2007

Kerry Affirms Support of DC Voting Rights

WASHINGTON D.C. - Today, on Emancipation Day in Washington, DC, Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) made the following statement supporting voting rights for residents in the District of Columbia. Senator Kerry has co-sponsored legislation supporting DC voting rights, and currently supports the House bill.

"Those who live in Washington, DC should have the same rights as all other American citizens, period," Senator Kerry said. "They deserve a voice in legislation that impacts their lives, and they deserve the right to elect their representatives. Every American's vote must be counted equally -- regardless of race, wealth, religion, or gender, and the same goes for place of residence. It's unfair and undemocratic to deny DC residents this basic right. I will continue to fight for full voting rights for DC residents and want to commend Mayor Fenty and Congresswoman Holmes Norton for their leadership."

link


04/17/2007

Kerry Says Administration Must Work With Congress to Protect Middle Class Families From AMT

WASHINGTON D.C. - Today, the day millions of Americans tax returns are due to the IRS, Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) spoke on the floor of the Senate on the urgent need to fix the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

The AMT, which was originally put into effect decades ago to ensure the wealthiest Americans were paying their share of the tax responsibility, now burdens more and more middle class families every year and threatens to affect over 20 million Americans next year.

Earlier this year, Kerry sponsored legislation that will address the AMT for 2007 and repeal the lower tax rates on capital dividends for 2009 and 2010.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, wasn't there a filibuster of Judge Alito
in January of 2006 and the Democratic Party leadership refused to back it or take it seriously. Too bad. Bad judges make bad law. In this case, bad judges can set back the rights of a whole gender of people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. You bet...
So would the entire world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. President Kerry wouldn't have appointed rightwing kooks to the Supreme Court.
The Bush legacy is a cesspool of incompetence, arrogance, and mean-spirited retro-think.

A disaster for our republic. Lincoln's ghost would haunt someone like Dubya, but it's too busy puking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Amen to that!
JK is a wonderful guy and would have been a fantastic president. But I'm so glad that he's continuing to fight for us in the Senate - he continues to prove what a great leader he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And I am distrustful of all those senators who choose to NOT FIGHT and not backup senators
who do.

On Alito filibuster, what senators were hitting the airwaves to support Kerry and Kennedy's filibuster? What senators were undermining the filibuster behind the scenes by attacking Kerry and the effort in the media?

On Rumsfeld's firing in 2003-4, what senators were hitting the airwaves to support Kerry, Dean and Clark on that call?

On Downing Street Memos, what senators would sign the letter of inquiry?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrafty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Hear, hear.
We are all going to suffer because Dems in the last Congress spent too much time eating their own and too little time legislating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. All senators who voted for cloture on Scalito:
F*** you.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/04/18/federal_abortion_ban/index.html

Supreme Court upholds federal abortion ban

Well, there you go. Conservatives can complain all they want about the president's performance on same-sex marriage and immigration, but the Bush-stacked Supreme Court -- having just announced its decision to uphold the Federal Abortion Ban -- has officially handed them a giant freaking gift. As the New York Times/AP reports, "The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion."

Which is funny, because it does. The 2003 law was been struck down by six separate courts as unconstitutional. It carries no exception for health risks to the mother; it's also said to be worded so vaguely as to cover -- at least in chilling effect -- some of the earliest, most common abortion procedures. The procedure it bans in particular is itself not only rare, but also necessary in some of the most heartbreaking cases. Just ask the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, or Gretchen Voss. (By the way, anytime the press lazily calls anything other than the original title of this bill "partial birth abortion," the terrorists win.)

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pulled few punches in her scathing dissent. "For the first time since Roe, the Court blesses a prohibition with no exception protecting a woman's health," she said. The ban "and the Court's defense of it cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away" -- with "flimsy and transparent justifications" -- "at a right declared again and again by this Court." <...>


Pardon my language, but this just pisses me off, predictable as it was. Here are the yea votes, dems in bold.

http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00001

YEAs ---72
Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Enzi (R-WY)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

Needless to say, John Kerry is my hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. And in other news...
The sky is blue...

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What a day though. The Repubs stick together to filibuster on Medicare
because they have been extensively lobbied by the Drug and Pharmaceutical industries. So the plan by the Dems to reign in the costs of prescription drugs for Seniors fails.

Why can't the Dems stay together on their core issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruzicka Nemchinov Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It's kinda of hard to pass legislation in the Senate
WHEN YOU HAVE A ONE VOTE MAJORITY. You fight the fights you can win and as long as we only have a one vote majority and Bush is holding the veto button this stuff will happen more often, your going to have to suck it up and campaign hard for other Dem candidates running in the Senate in 2008 and the Dem running for President if you want real effective results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The Republicans blocked the Medicare bill with 42 votes.
Edited on Wed Apr-18-07 02:17 PM by ProSense
42 Senators voted against Alito.

42 Senators could have blocked Alito.

Unfortunately, he is on the bench for life.

Edited to delete reference to Bork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not in NJ, it isn't - it's gray
but maybe if John Kerry were President, we would feel like it was a bright sunny day. :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. The country would have been better off with President Camacho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. If only we had President Kerry....
President Kerry would have gotten us out of Iraq by now. President Kerry would be rebuilding our crumbling healthcare system that is dysfunctional and isn't working. President Kerry would be confronting poverty, and you bet your ass he wouldn't ignore those poor individuals in New Orleans. President Kerry would be protecting our environment, protecting our rights, and protecting our country. Instead of "The Real Deal" we've got "The Raw Deal"

I hope we get it right in 2008!! 2000 and 2004 are lessons that we can't let another one get stolen. Not us, not again!! No way, no how!! I don't care if it's Hillary, Obama, Edwards or who ever. We can't let it happen. Our country is too important for eight more years of this bullshit. I want my generation to have a chance in hell of being successful. Right now it's not looking to good for this college student.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. The country would have been better off
with a rabid doberman as a president. We still would have gotten bitten in the ass less than with the current one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC