Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman Sends More Requests to Unitary Executive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:12 PM
Original message
Waxman Sends More Requests to Unitary Executive
Edited on Wed Apr-18-07 04:13 PM by babylonsister
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/21465

Waxman Sends More Requests to Unitary Executive
Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2007-04-18 20:57. Congress

In a letter to the Republican National Committee, Chairman Waxman states that it is unacceptable that - after three letters from the Committee - the RNC has provided only minimal information regarding White House officials' use of RNC e-mail accounts. In response to the RNC's proposal to limit the Committee's request for e-mail, Chairman Waxman requests basic facts about the scope and nature of the emails sent using these accounts before he assesses whether such limitations are required. See:
http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1256.

Link to letter here:

http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20070418161112.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Elections have consequences, RNC
The days when you could just blow off inquiries are over, and you'd better get the Chairman the information he wants, and that right quick. Stay on 'em Mr. Waxman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I just wonder what will happen if this admin continues to stonewall.
What recourse is there other than a long, drawn-out, eventual appearance in the Supreme Court? I think that's what they're banking on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC