Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPMcafe: House, Senate Dems Agree on War Spending Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 03:34 PM
Original message
TPMcafe: House, Senate Dems Agree on War Spending Bill
Yet, amazingly, President Bush has declared he will veto this bill, as well. Feingold supported the Senate Iraq funding bill as a good start, and I assume he will vote for this version that came out of conference today-- altho he has yet to issue a statement.
House, Senate Dems Agree On War Spending Bill

By Greg Sargent

House and Senate Dems have reached tentative agreement on the big war spending bill. According to the Associated Press, the legislation does the following:

• Funds more than $90 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

• Begins withdrawal of troops from Iraq on Oct. 1, with the goal of ending combat by April 1, 2008.

• Requires troop withdrawal to begin July 1 if President Bush cannot certify that the Iraqi government is making progress in disarming militias, reducing sectarian violence and forging political agreements.

• Restricts foreign aid spending in Iraq if benchmarks are not met.

• Allows Bush to keep troops in Iraq after the withdrawal date to conduct counterterrorism missions, protect U.S. infrastructure and personnel and train Iraqi security forces.

• Bars deployment of troops not deemed "fully mission capable" and limits combat tours to one year for Army units and seven months for Marines. Allows president to waive these restrictions.

• Adds about $25 billion not requested by Bush for medical care for troops and veterans, aid to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, farm disaster relief and other programs.

So, as expected, the bill contains the Senate's version: It mandates that withdrawal begin this year, with the nonbinding goal of having all the troops out in a year or so. It'll be interesting to see where the House liberals go on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks good. Too bad stubborn Bushie won't come to reality., and will veto it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wonder what General Petraeus said when he went to Capitol hill today to argue against a timeline-
according to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is too weak for me, but if dumbass vetos it perhaps
the next version will be better. Then he can veto that too, and the bill could get even better. Perhaps finally, at the end of his rope, our dumbass pretzeldent will be forced to sign a bill that mandates immmediate withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's Too Weak for Me Also
I have always thought this was a risky political move, partly because IMO backing into a nonbinding version is worse than not doing it at all.

For Bush to veto the bill now is ridiculous. If Congress backs up further and makes it completely nonbinding, I'm afraid it will completely kill the Democratic aura of strength and momentum. OOH, there is the opposite risk that Congress will persist, get a stronger bill passed, and Bush will veto and play chicken with funding the troops. But rightly or wrongly, if public opinion turns against the Dems, they may feel they have to back down, which will be worse yet. At this point, there is no good way but forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC