Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers: "We take allegations like this one very seriously"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 02:54 PM
Original message
Conyers: "We take allegations like this one very seriously"
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/003081.php

DoJ Lawyer: Controversial Prosecutor Played Politics at Department
By Paul Kiel - April 24, 2007, 3:07 PM

When Ty Clevenger, a line attorney in the Civil Rights Division, forwarded a friend's resume to deputy division chief Bradley Schlozman, he was expecting questions about his friend's experience as a lawyer. But what Schlozman wanted to know, according to Clevenger, was whether his friend was a Republican.

Clevenger, a member of the Republican National Lawyers Association, told Schlozman that his friend was conservative. He just wasn't sure how active his friend was politically. The friend never got an interview.

It's the most direct account yet of politicization at the Justice Department. There have been many other signs -- and not just the administration's preference for "loyal Bushies" as U.S. attorneys. Last week, a group of anonymous Justice Department employees wrote to the House and Senate judiciary committees to complain about politicization in the department's hiring process. The deputy attorney general's office, they alleged, was screening department applicants to eliminate Democrats.

"We take allegations like this one very seriously," House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) told me, reacting to Clevenger's account. "Specific to the Civil Rights Division, we are investigating complaints of politicization both in hiring and prosecutions. The Justice Department is not the place for this type of political cronyism, and we will get to the bottom of it."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Throwing Stones Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. and to think, I wanted a job there
I wonder how far back the politicizing goes. I interviewed to work in the DOJ's criminal tax department in 2004 - at the time, I was completing an LLM in tax (a degree beyond my basic law JD) and had a sterling record (law school and undergrad cum laude, top 10% at law school, managing editor of law review, plus 4 distinguished years in the Marine Corps - including a purple heart). But I also had several "liberal", "red" flags on my resume, including many years of work at a lefty nonprofit and a recommendation from a state judge who had worked in Carter's DOJ.

I suppose that if I had gotten the job, my desire to investigate wealthy taxcheats wouldn't have been popular anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think you would have been hired, and for that you can
be grateful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throwing Stones Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It was an entry-level professional position, though, GS-12, 13 at the most
These positions are the so-called "career prosecutor" jobs and are, by design, non-partisan.

While I'm not unhappy with the career trajectory I ended up with, working for the DOJ, even under the tortureczar, would have been a nice profession-enhancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-24-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You could consider trying again in 2009 if that's feasible; I'm thinking
there might be a different admin by then. (Fingers crossed!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC