Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry's War Democrats are taking ownership of a defeat in Iraq.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:14 AM
Original message
Harry's War Democrats are taking ownership of a defeat in Iraq.
Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT


We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war. Senator Schumer has shown me numbers that are compelling and astounding.
--Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, April 12.

Gen. David Petraeus is in Washington this week, where on Monday he briefed President Bush on the progress of the new military strategy in Iraq. Today he will give similar briefings on Capitol Hill, but maybe he should save his breath. As fellow four-star Harry Reid recently informed America, the war Gen. Petraeus is fighting and trying to win is already "lost."

Mr. Reid has since tried to "clarify" that remark, and in a speech Monday he laid out his own strategy for Iraq. But perhaps we ought to be grateful for his earlier candor in laying out the strategic judgment--and nakedly political rationale--that underlies the latest Congressional bid to force a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq starting this fall. By doing so, he and the Democrats are taking ownership of whatever ugly outcome follows a U.S. defeat in Iraq.





This isn't to say that the Administration hasn't made its share of major blunders in this war. But at least Mr. Bush and his commanders are now trying to make up for these mistakes with a strategy to put Prime Minister Maliki's government on a stronger footing, secure Baghdad and the Sunni provinces against al Qaeda and allow for an eventual, honorable, U.S. withdrawal. That's more than can be said for Mr. Reid and the Democratic left, who are making the job for our troops more difficult by undermining U.S. morale and Iraqi confidence in American support.


http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009986
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am not posting this because I agree with it
But becasue we need to know about this new stratagy to discredit the dems in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Imagine that. The Wall Street Journal editorial page is attacking Democrats and defending Bush.
What a surprise. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Consider the source, then ignore it. Nothing will change their tone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. BUHWAWAWA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. This invalidates the whole thing...
>>secure Baghdad and the Sunni provinces against al Qaeda<<

I guess we're supposed to just ignore the fact that al-Qaeda is Sunni. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's a good thing that the Republicans never used 9/11 and the war politically
:rofl:

What a bunch of lying chickenhawk asses...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. What a surprise, loyal Bushies are trying to lay the fault for their
leaders failure on the Democrats. Who knew this was coming? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe it's the failed occupation, launched for immoral reasons,
that is undermining U.S. morale and Iraqi confidence, and not Dems' trying to end the war. The WSJ is just following the RW talking points--"Mistakes were made, but we must carry on with our noble cause". Fold it up and put it under your cockatiel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Reid doesn't have to "clarify" anything if you're literate
Which is, admittedly, a stretch for folks who write for the editorial page of the Wall Street Urinal. Reid said the war is lost if the United States stays on the same disastrous path Bush has laid out. It was a conditional, not an absolute statement. There is still time and there are still ways to bring about a more orderly Iraqi society, but the Bush administration "whack-a-mole" strategy is not it.

Those who have ears to hear, let them hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-25-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Someone has to take ownership.

Everyone now agrees it was a mistake to occupy Iraq in the first place. Everyone agrees that this administration's mismangement made that mistake even worse. And now they want *us* to take ownership of their screwups.

Fine. The Conservatives win. It's all our fault that a Iraq is a mess and has been since the beginning. We take the blame. You no longer have to keep bleeding our military just to make the Republican party look tough. Just bring our troops home, and tell everyone it's our fault it didn't work. We will happily accept the blame if that is what it takes to get you to finally do the right thing, the smart thing, the decent thing.

Then we'll let the voters decide next election which party they trust and respect.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC