Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hagel Says He Would Consider Presidential Run as an Independent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:50 PM
Original message
Hagel Says He Would Consider Presidential Run as an Independent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Barf!
However, if he ran on a ticket with Bloomberg, they would actually be viable. I could easily see Lieberman being his campaign chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Haven't seen much of him lately. I guess his fake Democrat veneer wore thin, once the real Democrats
took over.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting
The party(or rather the Bush dynasty) has effectively frozen him out of even playing a small role as an alternative voice to let out the steam of Iraq. IF the GOP main nominees disintegrate he can run outside as a savior- but not as a spoiler like Buchanan or Perot. That would give him an in, by losing, into reforming the ruins of the party. This reaffirms that he might truly be an outsider, at least in the personal power sense.

He cannot reprise even the failed rifest run of Reagan who got shellacked by the establishment but won things that enabled him gain from within once Ford got trounced, as MCGovern lost the first time and gained things to enable him to get the nomination the next time after Humphrey lost. Not a brave position and not a selfless one either, but perhaps he had no option. Cuomo could possibly have said the same although he had a better shot with less pressure and never imagined a third party run.

So to work unlike all the other third party runs, Hagel cannot be a spoiler, the GOP must be a sure no-win and he must a hope of reaping gain after the debacle. All very, very difficult and unprecedented considerations. Or it must be part of a third party strategy by the Bushes themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. The BFEE has effectively shut him down in the GOP--
they are trying to unseat him here in NE with someone who runs to the right of him--that tells you what kind of lunatic we have to contend with here, 'cause it's pretty hard to run to the right of Hagel without being a total neocon psycho. Hagel is getting out of the GOP, I'm pretty sure. He called out the neocons BY NAME last week in a Novak article, including Cheney, and dissed them--there is no going back (and he actually used the word "neocon", which I wish the Dems would start doing as well--very important to tie that movement to the GOP). I almost believe he wouldn't mind being a spoiler to keep the neocons from retaining power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. third parties have mixed results on our process..
I think Theodore Roosevelt and Ross Perot had a positive effect on both parties. but I believe George Wallace and Strom Thurmond had an equally negative effect when they ran.

When Perot ran, he made it harder for Republicans to turn the possibility of tax increases into political weapon, while giving Clinton the political momentum needed to pass his five year budget in 1993. TR helped to make Taft beatable in 1912, while giving Wilson the political momentum to push through 16th and 17th amendments in 1913.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting - The story is from BLOOMBERG News Service!
Something's up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hagel was suckered in to provide cover for a movement to give the
CEO class a backup plan to capture the middle and the WH. Hagel, IMO is not the brightest bulb in the crate. He is anti Iraq but very conservative and now will be used to get rid of the fundies the(CEO class) no longer need.

Anti-science is bad for business. Anti-education is bad for business. Anti-energy is bad for business and pretending to be morally pure is getting to grate on to many nerves. ego. Fundies are a drag on the economy and becoming a bore.

Back to Hagle, he is not smart enough to pull it off and take all heat and will be back in Neb. looking for bees in Jan 09.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hagel, imo, will accept 2nd spot on ticket to the man that will fund them
Mayor Michael Bloomberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I've posted several times I think it will be a Bloomberg/Melinda Gates ticket. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Are you being serious? If so - why? (why Gates) -nt
Edited on Sat May-05-07 12:15 AM by democrat2thecore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Why not? Bloomberg, Buffet and Gates will put up the money and It will
serve two purposes. Oversee the transfer of wealth and it just good politics to have woman on the ticket to cancel out Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Buffet and Gates would be limited like everyone else
Only Bloomberg could spend whatever he wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Spending limits only apply to those who don't have anything to spend.
Setting up 50 state organizations to form a new party and get on the fifty state ballots have no limits. The Supremes will rule on limits before Oct and you know what they will probably throw out all limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. What about Hagel says "not smart"? He doesn't strike me as dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. For one, it only took Bloomberg 1 lunch to throw away his political career.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Why? He and Bloomberg have known each other for a long time.
Hagel's political career is a little shaky here in NE, but that's mostly because of Eye-Rack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. The CEO class has had a backup plan since 1985. It is called the DLC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. This movement is much more than the DLC,GOP, or DNC.
This is a take them all down and start over movement. A "wise elder" type of thing. A sort of reform of the nerds thing is the best way I can explain it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well good for him, and
maybe he and bloomberg can create a third party and take more votes away from the repub nominee....
BD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. This could be bad for us
Not that I'm worried that Hagel will keep us from effectively winning, what I'm worried about is this unfortunately gives the GOP an out. When they lose, they will still keep trying the same thing and keep hurting the country. We not only have to beat them, we have to make damn sure THEY know THEY lost on their merits or lack thereof and take the pound of flesh as a reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. he could do some damage as an independant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. Wyldwolf, what do you think?
He strikes me as a pretty strong candidate in this climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. Cool...someone else to not vote for!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC