Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I find HRC spokesperson Howard Wolfson completely offputting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 04:52 PM
Original message
I find HRC spokesperson Howard Wolfson completely offputting


This is NOT about HRC herself. It is narrowly and specifically about this guy, who is her chief spokesperson.

I know he has reasonably good, long term Dem credentials. He's probably a pretty nice guy.

But, he's awful, in my opinion, on teevee. He seems surly. He seems unsympathetic. He seems dogmatic.

He needs to seem cheerier and brighter. He looks like a thug, really. With a hint of Ari Fleischer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed...I doubt he'll last long
Ari Fleischer at least knew how to smile for the camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wolfson is around to stay. Glover Park not for net neutrality??
Hillary lent him to Lamont, and for some reason Lamont took a vacation. And he quit talking about the war. And Swanny did not get heard much.

See my post above.

Also...
http://www.democraticmedia.org/jcblog/?p=101

"The folks at the Glover Park Group—who last year helped conduct a stealth campaign to aid Rupert Murdoch—are now assisting Sen. Ted Stevens wreck the U.S. electronic media system. Stevens’ Commerce Committee released a poll yesterday slamming “onerous Net Neutrality regulations.” The Verizon-paid for poll illustrates how desperate Sen. Stevens and his phone/cable monopoly allies are (nothing about Verizon’s sponsorship is cited in the release or the poll—something the Commerce Committee should apologize to the public for).

Stevens and company can’t really speak about the substantive issues involving Internet Freedom—because they lose. So Stevens and allies now appear to be hanging their argument supporting a closed Internet on a poll finding that only “very few registered voters are familiar with the issue of network neutrality.” As if the lack of public awareness about an important policy issue means something is wrong with it! Hello. Has the Senator been swallowing those tubes, instead of using them to get his talking points from the Glover Park Group flackery shop?

Now, to the “bipartisan” Glover Park Group (which did the poll with Public Opinion Strategies). Aren’t we tired of Democrats who take the big bucks and the public interest be damned? This poll was written to help phone companies scuttle policies designed to provide community oversight of electronic media. The poll should come with a warning: “this is a political tool.” That Stevens, Glover Park, and Public Opinion would hold it up as some objective measure is a sad joke. It’s a lobbying love letter for Verizon, AT&T, BellSouth and the USTA. It asks questions about network neutrality purposely designed to undermine it as an issue. Perhaps that’s why the poll doesn’t reveal who funded it. Such well-known Democratic operatives as Howard Wolfson, Joe Lockhart, and Carter Eskew run Glover Park. In 2005, the group helped Rupert Murdoch organize a campaign designed to keep bringing in extra cash for his Fox TV empire. Press reports say they also have worked for big cable companies as well."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. More about Wolfson and Glover Park group.
http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/7/30/142232/789

This group may explain why we are still stuck with that medicare drug bill fiasco.

And more on it.

http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/6/17/113759/317

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah I wasn't too impressed with him...
When he was on after the debate...

Mandy Greenwald is good...very professional...Wolfson seemed unprepared for the questions he was being asked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. He is one of the snottiest people and to have him out as the one speaking for her is careless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like Wolfson's "no-nonsense" style. We live in deadly serious times.(n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC