Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats war against anti-military image: Condemn Iraq war, but extol troops fighting it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 05:42 AM
Original message
Democrats war against anti-military image: Condemn Iraq war, but extol troops fighting it
Edited on Sun May-13-07 07:54 AM by newyawker99
LAT: Democrats war against anti-military image
As they condemn the Iraq conflict, they extol the troops fighting it and vow to 'take proper care of our heroes.'
By Mark Z. Barabak, Times Staff Writer
May 13, 2007

Ever since the Vietnam era, Democrats have struggled to overcome a notion the party is not just antiwar but antimilitary.

Now, sensing a chance to shed that image, Democrats are wrapping themselves in khaki and embracing the nation's fighting men and women.

Even as they press for withdrawal from Iraq, congressional Democrats have proposed more money for armored vehicles, shorter tours of duty for Reserve soldiers and expanded programs to care for veterans.

On the campaign trail, party leaders and Democratic presidential hopefuls invariably couple condemnation of the war with expressions of sympathy and support for those fighting.

The reception has been positive, from even the most fervently antiwar audiences. Recently, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) drew a cheering, whistling, foot-stomping reception at the state party convention in San Diego when she combined an assault on the Bush administration with heaping praise for U.S. troops.

"We salute them for their courage, their patriotism and the sacrifices they and their families are willing to make," Pelosi told the crowd, which was speckled with signs calling for Bush's impeachment and an immediate end to the war.

Pelosi said that instead of being honored upon their return, "veterans are being forced to cope with a system that is not equipped to care for them.

More at Link:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-troops13may13,0,7731351.story?coll=la-home-nation
------------------------------------------
EDIT: COPYRIGHT. PLEASE POST ONLY 4 OR 5
PARAGRAPHS FROM THE COPYRIGHTED NEWS SOURCE
PER DU RULES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. the Democrats have ALWAYS supported the troops
it's not just about fighting any image. it's what Democrats do.

why don't these whores write about Republicans who love to claim to be pro military while treating the soldiers like shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. since before this war the left wing of the democratic
has been behind the troops because we knew that they were going to die for the big lie. as for the some of the democrats in washington we have seen where they stood when their name was called
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good point here
Still, polltaker Peter Hart, who has advised scores of Democratic candidates, cautions that the party has to "make up a lot ground" to convince a majority of voters that its members can be as strong as Republicans on national defense.

"You have perceptions that have been ground in over a long, long period of time," said Hart, who suggested that supporting the troops was one way of showing the party's resolve.

"There are periods of time when people open a window and are willing to listen," he said. "I think Democrats have one of those windows."


Every time I see somebody here make the point that national security or the war will not be an issue for 2008, I think of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC