Bush could double force by Christmas ( Surge II )

The Bush administration is quietly on track to nearly double the number of combat troops in Iraq this year, an analysis of Pentagon deployment orders showed Monday.

The little-noticed second surge, designed to reinforce U.S. troops in Iraq, is being executed by sending more combat brigades and extending tours of duty for troops already there.

The actions could boost the number of combat soldiers from 52,500 in early January to as many as 98,000 by the end of this year if the Pentagon overlaps arriving and departing combat brigades.

Separately, when additional support troops are included in this second troop increase, the total number of U.S. troops in Iraq could increase from 162,000 now to more than 200,000 -- a record-high number -- by the end of the year.

The numbers were arrived at by an analysis of deployment orders by Hearst Newspapers.

"It doesn't surprise me that they're not talking about it," said retired Army Maj. Gen. William Nash, a former U.S. commander of NATO troops in Bosnia, referring to the Bush administration. "I think they would be very happy not to have any more attention paid to this."

.......
...........
............
http:/swww.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/05/22/MNG7QPV65N1.DTL

that the democratic congress will do to stop it.
They will amke a lot of noise..
put on a good show..
and in the end..as usual..
they will be cowed and scared by this 28 per cent approval president.
so very patheticaly sad..
i have made my last campaigh donation to the democratic party.
I understand now, why people just stay home and not bother to vote.

Where is he going to get so many soliders? If he's already got them, why not deploy them now? And since he got rid of the general who told him he'd need a least 250K troops in the first place, doesn't Bush owe him an apology?


rocknation