|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 09:50 PM Original message |
Jim Webb's statement on the Supplamental... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. Empty words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Hardly...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Between the rock and the hard place theres very little wiggle room.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Webb truly believes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 09:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
23. This is starting to get confusing.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fedupinBushcountry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. I respect Webb's opinion, and his willingness and ability to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. If he worked so freaking hard AGAINST it, why did he vote FOR it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. You must not have been paying much attention to Webb's campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. The veterans all voted FOR the bill. I cut Webb and Murtha some slack-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LBJDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Me too. Byrd also voted for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. So now you don't count Kerry as a veteran? He voted no. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I do--just forgot that he was a vet, that's all! He stood on principle, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's okay, he owns a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Pretty stunning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Who said he's playing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. You... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. The game is Bush's n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. And you are asking Senators... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-24-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Stop playing Bush's game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. It's also Lieberman's game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
auburngrad82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
21. This is what it's all about: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. WHAT???? He is saying he won't vote against something because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
auburngrad82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 10:19 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Use your head |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Tell me what it would have hurt for him to vote no. Please tell me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
auburngrad82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. How is it closing your eyes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 11:48 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Of course the right wing are happy the dems caved, I am not. Are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
auburngrad82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Oh, bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 01:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Would it have hurt him to vote no? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
22. Bullsh*t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-25-07 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
24. He should be on Fox. Total bullshit. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC