QuinnipiacPoll: Hillary leads Dems by double digits, bests all Republicans, Edwards tanking......

Hillary 35
Obama 21
Gore 18
Edwards 9


General Election matchups

Clinton 45 Guiliani 44
Obama 42 Guiliani 42
Gore 45 Guiliani 43

Clinton 44 McCain 42
Obama 43 McCain 41
Gore 44 McCain 41

Clinton 46 Thompson 39
Obama 46 Thompson 34
Gore 49 Thompson 37


Edwards having dropped to fourth they apparently didn't do general election matchups for him




http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1075

Edwards tanking in New Hampshire where he is close to dropping into 5th behind a man not running and Richardson...same scenario in Texas...and can't get above the MoE over Hillary in his own home state!

Everyone can agree on!

dilemma. It seems to be coming down to a contest between the odd couple, hyper-Rudy and laid-back-Fred. I love it that in a Tennessee match-up, Gore vs. Thompson, Gore wins.

On a more serious note, we need a President who will not further divide this country at a time when it faces momentous problems. I hope Al Gore will answer that call.

I like Gore, but that is just hero worship talking.

potential than any other candidate in either party to bring the country together around issues that are vital to our future. I saw a New Hampshire voter on TV saying "I'm holding out for Gore. We're past the time for on-job-training." That's my position too.

We live in a country where 30 percent of the population still thinks Bush is doing a good job. That means we will continue to be divided whoever the next President might be, but I think Gore has the best chance of bringing together the remaining 70 percent who are capable of rational thought.

I saw some numbers on that somewhere, but I can't remember where (I'm in Tennessee, so it may have even been on the local news).

Tennessee has a beloved Dem governor and a mostly Dem General Assembly so, for the life of me, I can't figure out why we keep sending RepubliCONS to DC on the federal side. :grr:

Everyone knows Bill's the de facto vice president.

They just need someone with a pulse and doesn't drool for the so-called veep job.

MoE on the Democratic part of the poll was 3.5...

It's a national poll seven months out of Iowa, where I will bet money that Senator Clinton will place a distant third...then we'll see what the perception is.

I plan on going to Iowa a decent amount to do my part for Obama. It's going to be fun!

Thompson jumps to #2 on their side and he's not officially running yet.
"For Thompson, 57 percent haven't heard enough to form an opinion."

There's a big danger lurking in those numbers.

Southern Grandpa vs. The Senator from New York.

Let's hope McCain is pissed off enough to run a "Unity 08" campaign.

Not receiving the media scrutiny coming his way...

The man has alot of skeletons in his closet

Bush in 2000 was given a free pass.
Why would the Republican CEOs at Fox, Viacom, Time/Warner and General Electric treat Thompson differently?

What scandals? He and his first wife are on good terms. In fact, she said she'll campaign for him.

He's smokin' and he's not even running - at this time.

And =THAT= is the good news!

;)

That's what these poll numbers tell me.

We can't change that, it doenst reflect on Hillary, it proves that hillbillies make up half this f'd up country.

That Obama and Hillary hold their own agains the republicans.

Speak to me in seven months.

go to Act Blue and see how people are voting with their wallets.

:-)
Hillary at ActBlue (all contributions) = $941.00
John Edwards at ActBlue (all contributions) = $3,176,938

traffic is mainly sent through "progressive" blogs so the results at actblue naturally favor those candidates endorsed by KOS and company.

follow the money

John Edwards dominates money race in South
From Louisiana to the Carolinas, Democrat tops all other 2008 hopefuls

WASHINGTON - North Carolina’s John Edwards says he’s the only Democratic presidential candidate with any chance of winning the coveted South.

If early fundraising is any indication, he might be right.
Counting only Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina, Edwards raised $2,723,000. That’s more than six times Clinton’s take of $440,471 and nearly four times the $705,650 raised by Obama, according to numbers compiled by PoliticalMoneyLine.org, an online repository of campaign finance data.

Among Republicans, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney led the way with $1,127,484, compared with $603,723 for Arizona Sen. John McCain and $384,500 for Giuliani.

“For Edwards, he’s a Southern guy and there’s a comfort level there,” said John Anzalone, an Alabama-based Democratic pollster. For Clinton and Giuliani, “it’s kind of like the Pace Picante Sauce commercial: They’re from New York City.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18435016/

...he'd be in first place and not third or fourth.

remember "shy responders"

I hope the democratic party doesnt shoot itself in the foot again. If she wins the nomination you people better vote for her.

She's my senator, and she is an outstanding campaigner - no one better, IMO.

June 13, 2007

ARG poll: Clinton 39%, Obama 19%, Edwards 13%

"Support for Barack Obama has dropped 12 percentage points from March."

http://americanresearchgroup.com/

moe +/- 4%pts.

If the pt spread gets any larger, the moe will be irrelevant..