Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton can boast wealth of earmarks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:07 PM
Original message
Clinton can boast wealth of earmarks
Presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) has secured more earmarks in the fiscal 2008 defense authorization bill than any other Democrat except for panel Chairman Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.).

The bill contains about $5.4 billion in earmarks, or projects not requested by the Pentagon. With their slim majority, the Democrats on the panel claimed two-thirds of that sum. Clinton is among their more junior members.

Obama, who is not a member of the committee, made a request along with several other members for a Department of Education program for children with severe disabilities.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a presidential candidate and the panel’s ranking member, has long opposed pork-barrel projects and has no earmark requests. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a new member of the panel, also refrained. The two have sponsored earmark-disclosure language as part of the bill’s markup.

In the 2008 defense authorization committee report, Senate authorizers published a list of projects requested by lawmakers as well as projects agreed upon by the entire panel. The list does not yet include the companies that would benefit from the extra money.

But several senators, including Levin and Clinton, have already touted their achievements in press releases listing companies in their state that would benefit from the requests.

Clinton received 26 earmarks worth about $148.4 million total, most of which were also sought by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). Clinton and Schumer agreed several years ago to go after projects together, according to several sources.

While Schumer has more seniority, Clinton has much higher name recognition and committee membership, which makes her better positioned to deliver projects for the state.


http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/clinton-can-boast-wealth-of-earmarks-2007-06-13.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not much of a bragging point for a party sworn to end ear-marks
But that's just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. the democrats version of Sen. "Tubes" Stevens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Self-delete. n/t
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 09:32 PM by ElizabethDC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. here are some of her beneficiaries of her generosity
Clinton’s beneficiaries include defense giant Northrop Grumman, which secured $6 million for the AN/SPQ-9B radar; New York-based Telephonics, which won $5 million for a standardized aircraft wireless intercom system for the National Guard Black Hawk helicopter fleet; Plug Power Inc., another New York state company, which got $3 million for fuel cell power technology; and Alliant Tech Systems (ATK), which won $3.5 million for the X-51 B robust scramjet research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. OMG - $ for the National Guard! Research! Defense! Oh, horror! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They stated they would not do the same as the Repugs
Now all of a sudden because it is a dem it is okay. We are supposed to be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, at least it's not a million-dollar bridge to nowhere.
I mean, it's worthy stuff. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The money could have been put on Education, or
health care. The Hiliary did not ask for the money for these items. I see this continuing in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes it could.
Obama added one earmark. It was for an educational program for children with disabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. oooh! Can't wait for the left to try to make an issue of national defense earmarks! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. WOW...wtf?
Did I just see what I think I saw?

A DUer actually thinks that an earmark to defense giant Northrup Grumman is a GOOD thing?

So bloating the MIC is good if a Democrat does it?

God I cannot understand party loyalists....swimming in hypocrisy is not something I do well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "swimming in hypocrisy"? oh come on...
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 09:35 AM by dionysus
why, i can assure you that's merely wading hip deep in hypocrisy ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The only reason why they are trying to justify it is because it is
Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC