Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm kinda DOWN on Harry Reid these days...here's something from Josh Marshall's Site:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:48 PM
Original message
I'm kinda DOWN on Harry Reid these days...here's something from Josh Marshall's Site:
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 07:23 PM by KoKo01
Two More Bloggers Deny Politico Report About Reid Disparaging Generals
By Greg Sargent | bio

Okay, we've just spoken to two more bloggers who were on the conference call with Harry Reid.

John Aravosis, who founded and runs the popular AmericaBlog, and Joe Sudbay, a D.C. political strategist who also writes for AmericaBlog, told me in interviews that say they don't remember Reid describing General Pace as incompetent or hear Reid disparaging Petraeus, as The Politico is reporting.

"I don't remember him saying this," Aravosis told us when asked about the assertion that Reid had called Paced "incompetent."

Sudbay, meanwhile, added: "If he had said something really juicy, we would have posted that ourselves."

Both Aravosis and Sudbay remember Reid discussing the two Generals, but said they don't remember him talking about them in the way that the Politico characterized the discussion. The Politico story claimed that Reid had called Pace "incompetent," and added that Reid had made "similar disparaging remarks" about Petraeus. Both Aravosis and Sudbay said they didn't remember Reid making any disparaging remarks about Petraeus.

The Politico story has set off an uproar, with Drudge linking it, John McCain and other leading Republicans attacking Reid over it, and White House press secretary Tony Snow using the story to slam Reid as anti-military at his press briefing today. But as we reported below, three other prominent bloggers on the call -- with Aravosis and Sudbay, that makes five total now -- didn't hear Reid say any such thing.

The Politico reporter who wrote the story is declining to comment on the bloggers' assertion and declining to comment on whether he spoke to anyone who was on the call. All five of these bloggers say they didn't hear from the Politico reporter.

Aravosis, meanwhile, pointed out that it was unlikely that the Politico could have gotten this from anyone on the call.

"Why would somebody on this call, which was on the record, hear something so newsworthy, and instead of posting it, call the Politico and tell them this on background?" Aravosis asked. "We would have written about it ourselves."

Intriguingly, Reid isn't denying directly that he said the remarks attributed to him, but he did say at a press conference today that he held Petraeus in high regard.

To be clear: We don't know what was said on the call, and we're not sure why Reid's office won't say so more directly. We're just trying to find out as much as we can by talking to the people who were on it.

It's possible, for instance, that Reid did mildly criticize Pace, and even conceivably Petraeus, without using the word "incompetent." Of course, without that one-word quote on the front page of the Politico, and then on Drudge, it almost certainly wouldn't have created the explosion that it did.

Meanwhile, AmericaBlog has much more on this in this post, which addresses this and an another important but overlooked aspect of this whole story. Check it out.

http://bobgeiger.blogspot.com/2007/06/politico-fails- journalism-100.html
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jun/14/two_more_bloggers_deny_politico_report_about_reid_disparaging_generals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your Geiger link isn't complete/isn't working. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Huh? ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Did I stutter? I'm getting "Page Not Found". Nevermind; here's a link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gonna self-delete this one.
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 07:00 PM by Kagemusha
I seem not to be fully aware of the facts in this case so I don't want to shoot my mouth off to far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just "modify" your comments and then let it Fly!
why would you delete a post on this...but just modify and repost. I'd like to hear what you have to say. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well I've read a little more. Gist seems.. Reid told Pace off (to his face)...
this stuff about Petraeus is a made up third hand report that got distributed to Drudge, Tony Snow and so on, and criticizing a general who ISN'T being fired is being used as a mackeral to slap Reid around with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Could be....we get so much spin and propaganda...sometimes it's
hard to know but if you see it on Drudge first and then it makes the rounds...it's likely to be RW Stuff.

:-( Their echo chamber is still alive and well and feeds into the M$M.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The more I hear about Politico.... the more any shred of credibility erodes.
They're burning out quick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Well...they are owned by the son of Joe Allbritton ...of Riggs Bank/Bandar Bush Fame
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 10:32 PM by KoKo01
so...you kind of know what that's about :-( For a new publication it's just AMAZING how much coverage with quotes from their RW Hack Reporters seem to drift around the Cables, C-Span and even on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Harry Reid didn't do anything wrong. In fact, he was a MAN and
told Pace TO HIS FACE that he was incompetent, and was merely recounting the story (this according to Bob Geiger). As Markos referred to in a post just put up, McCain went full out after Gen. Casey, yet nothing much was said about it at the time like this faux outrage.

You do know this is simply right wing claptrap faux outrage, right? Pace didn't get reappointed, so obviously a LOT of people think he is incompetent. Of course, not as incompetent as his boss.

I'm really sick of the gotcha stuff. Democrats are held to a different standard than Republicans, who are allowed to say what they want no matter how ridiculous, while Reid gets full scale attacked for a not very newsworthy comment.

(Politico is just a new Drudge Report) Also gotta love, how the White House grabbed onto it, and had a prepared comment. I have seen other Democrats set up like this in the past (but Drudge was the one doing it, not Politico), and it just makes me SICK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is that like the "down with" good? or "down on" as in not good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. alot of people are holding the dem leadership responsible without concidering
the lack of a real majority to push things forward. Yeah, they screwed up a bit but, they also have their backs against the wall with a very very slim majority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC