Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic Foot In Revolving Door

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 07:19 AM
Original message
Democratic Foot In Revolving Door
:argh: :argh:

http://public.cq.com/docs/cqw/weeklyreport110-000002538605.html

Democratic Foot In Revolving Door
By Alan K. Ota, CQ Staff

Months before Democrats recaptured control of Congress, some Washington lobbying firms sensed the way the wind was blowing and started hiring more Democrats to represent their clients.

In fact, even as Democrats campaigned on a promise to reduce the influence of lobbyists at the Capitol — in response to the Jack Abramoff case and similar influence scandals — several of their old congressional colleagues were picking up choice new K Street jobs.

Former House members Chris John of Louisiana and Max Sandlin of Texas, for instance, both of whom lost races in 2004, were among the first wave of beneficiaries. John was picked in March 2006 to be managing director of Ogilvy Government Services; Sandlin became co-chairman of Fleishman-Hillard’s Washington lobbying office in November, a few days before the midterm election. “There’s a new dynamic in Congress under the new Democratic majority, and it has been good for Democrats working on K Street,” said John.

But it hasn’t been good for the party leadership’s efforts to enact stricter lobbying legislation that might, in the words of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in January, “close the revolving door between government officials and lobbying firms.”

In particular, the Democratic joining of the K Street gold rush has helped to undermine Pelosi’s bid to create a two-year “cooling off period” before departed members of Congress and senior staff members may begin directly lobbying their former colleagues at the Capitol. The current waiting period is half as long, which ex-lawmakers find annoying but not debilitating to their lobbying careers.

The Senate passed the longer ban at the start of the year, but the House spurned the idea last month after a chorus of Democrats balked, with many of them stating openly that they did not want to harm their prospects for a lucrative career after lawmaking. (Instead, the House bill would require members of Congress to disclose any negotiations for lobbying jobs and recuse themselves from issues that would aid potential employers.)

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. K street had moved to near 100% GOP as demanded by the GOP - so this article notes a
re-balancing - no big deal

Indeed lobbyists main job is giving information to the hill - it is good to have a few Democrats with a presumed Democratic slant conveying that information.

Bribes and near bribes from lobbyists are mainly campaign contributions and campaign work - and only Federal funding of elections will stop that - until then, this is the system.

The writer of the article seems most angry about the level of pay the former Democratic Party legislators receive and would only be happy if they were reduced to minimum wage workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC