|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babsbunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:21 PM Original message |
Sheehan considers challenge to Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sheehan has become a really pathetic figure. This is so sad. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Pelosi is the one that is pathetic. She is the one that put impeachment "off the table." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. It is one thing to challenge her in the primary. It is another to publicly leave the Dem party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I support the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Well, if this happens, it's going to be hard on the Sheehan supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. Yes your correct this is Democratic Underground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:29 AM Response to Reply #50 |
64. Which would be hypocritical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. Given the Democrats' performance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
51. Agree. This is what I said when she "left" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
67. I'm guessing you haven't spent much time with her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good for her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Cheney's impeachment is very doable, lots of evidence against him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I am completely with you on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Do you really think Cheney will allow himself to be impeached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. The person who stands to become president if Bush and Cheney are impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. HR 333 is the Cheney impeachment resolution. Cheney must be impeached like Agnew was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. How is she blocking it? Can't Kucinich bring it up? How many co-sponsors has he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Speaker has the power to keep legislation from being heard or assigned a committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. So Kucinich has said his bill was blocked by Pelosi? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. No, Pelosi said that impeachment is "off the table." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. So has Kucinich tried? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Kucinich introduced H Res 333. The next move is up to the Speaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. It was assigned to the Judicary Committee on May 4th |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #43 |
56. whoops! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. No hearings are scheduled, nor will be scheduled, because of Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:54 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. You keep changing your story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:24 AM Response to Reply #57 |
63. Actually it's up to Conyers at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
68. Conyers could bring this up if he wanted to and give it a hearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
53. Agnew wasn't impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. So I'm not up on who can start those proceedings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. Not trying to be a smartass, but where did you hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Thom Hartmann. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Couldn't agree more. Are you with us or against us, Nancy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
40. But Sheehan would not replace her as Speaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:31 AM Response to Reply #40 |
65. I'd certainly like Steny Hoyer, Jim Clyburn, or Rahm Emmanuel less than Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhombus (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. I thought she said she had "retired". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
34. Yeah, even the mainstream media gave her a lot of attention when she did that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kimmerspixelated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. I sure like Cindy's gumption! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I think Maxine Waters should challenge Pelosi for the Speaker's chair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
14. So she is going to move residence to San Fran? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
46. I don't thinks she needs to move to San Francisco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progressive Friend (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'd definitely vote for Sheehan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Great that's all this party needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. Your "great Speaker" caved-in to Bush on defunding the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. She didn't cave on anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. She lost me when it stopped being about the war and started being about Cindy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AJH032 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
18. why not challenge a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CK_John (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
20. In my family clan "public speaking" was parent code for bs when the wee ones were around. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
21. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
24. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sleipnir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
32. Humm...this makes for an interesting read, seems that some DU'ers were right a few months back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
33. well, on the very small chance she won... say hello to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Now there's a point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
35. While it should be an interesting primary, there is no way Sheehan beats Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hooraydems06 (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #35 |
47. I wish you would tell that to the people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. There's no way a Republican could ever win CA-8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
36. Ya ever seen someone on the internet pull out a "Goodbye cruel world" post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
42. I've lost a great deal of confidence in our Democratic Leadership. A 23- 27% approval rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. That's weird |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Here's the site, but it doesn't include CNN's data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Thanks for the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heath Hatcher (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 11:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. Before we continueing debateing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-08-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I'm sorry to hear that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
59. Bravo Cindy! Pelosi has led the democrats on one long retreat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
60. The one time that I honestly thought Sheehan was "out there" was when.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
61. Cindy certainly has a right to run, that's what primaries are for, but she wouldn't get my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleveramerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
62. I worry about her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-09-07 03:42 AM Response to Original message |
66. An Open Letter to Nancy Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC