Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Vitter apologetic before he got caught....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:26 PM
Original message
Was Vitter apologetic before he got caught....
Was he repentant before the numbers were released...

Just like all the other Convenience Christians out there, he fessed up his "sin" only when he had too and came to an understanding with Jesus only when it suits his agenda...

Give me that old time religion...

At least as practiced by the right...

Maybe we should just start calling them the Wrong...

Cause that's the only political direction they are going to have if this keeps up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe he was repentant privately.
I don't like these hypocrites any more than you. I have been laughing all day.

But someone here mentioned having an affair, and the torment they suffered over it. I am sure he or she was repentant. I would be repenting, privately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. how dare you confuse us with facts? Why can't you understand that
the standards that govern Abstinence promoters, christian conservatives, and GOPers who run on strong family values platforms, DON'T HAVE THE SAME STANDARDS TO MEET? In other words, we can't apply our rules to them. They, however, can apply their book of fairy tales to us, even if we don't believe their collection of fables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. That whole pack of right-wing Jesus cultists...
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 03:42 PM by polichick
Doesn't have one solid conscience among them ~ imo they're faux Christian con-artists, as full of shit as a midsummer's day is long!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. he really needs and escort service now
because he ain't getting any home cookin' for a long time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's take out Vitals for Senator Vitter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Was Clinton apologetic before he got caught?
I'm just trying to be republican like. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You are not fit to lick Bill Clinton's boots.
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 03:56 PM by Perry Logan
Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No. I'm not fit to lick Clinton's boots.
Clinton himself, maybe but not his boots. :evilgrin: I was being sarcastic in my prior post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yea, but he didn't embrace Jesus did he...
He was always a true Christian without wearing it on his sleeve...

I think a lot of the RW embracesses Chrsitianity for one reason and one reason only: VOTES....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Exactly...
It's a disgustingly cynical use of religion ~ with zero meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who cares?
If you cheat on your S.O., what do you do? Feel sorry privately (assuming that you didn't think it was the best thing since sliced bread)? Do you tell your S.O. in contrition?

And if you do either of these things, do you make it public, telling your family, your friends, your co-workers that you were unfaithful?

Wouldn't "I didn't need to know that" be the proper response, until it became a public matter? I mean, I understand Sheehan--she didn't stop her son from signing up again and has decided that everybody wants to share her grief; some people are like her. Few, fortunately, decide that I care about their personal life and want to share their pain. By and large, I choose who's pain I want to share; I don't want to share Sheehan's, I don't want to share Vitter's.

Perspective's needed, not just thinking of everything in terms of votes mingled with an oddly quixotic additon of notions of absolute right and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's all about the hypocrisy...
Al about the sanctimonious being held to what they say...

It isn't even about fidelity...

I would make it an issue if someone said they were an environmentalist but secretly drove Hummers through fragile landscapes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC