Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think that the GOP nom is Thompson's to lose?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:50 PM
Original message
Do you think that the GOP nom is Thompson's to lose?
At first I was skeptical that Fred could be a viable challenger, but just a flavor of the month. And while I do think that Rudy is the most dangerous GOPer in the national election, I do feel that republicans really don't like rudy, mitt, or mccain. I'm glad to see old man mccain slowly dying. Its such a pathetic downfall - losing all his money, now losing his entire campaign staff, and now losing his Iowa staff. I've always thought that Romney had the money and fortitude to fight out a close campaign, but that Rudy should pull it out.

But with Mccain DOA, and though he has no money, I think Fred can really challenge Rudy for the votes. If he can somehow get the nomination, this puts the Dems in a very tought spot. Rudy, Mitt, and McCain all had glaring weaknesses that even republicans saw through. Fred has the Southern appeal to hold onto the swing states.

He might even nominate a female VP to contrast against his "conservative image" - which could weaken Hillary's support.

Granted, Fred hasn't been tested by the media - but he's been in the public eye for a while, so there's a great deal of familiarity with Southern voters and national voters. IMO, Fred is someone conservatives can vote for.

But I still think Rudy has a better chance at winning the national election of all the GOP contenders.

Hillary, Obama, Edwards all their strengths. Hillary has the fortitude to win a tight election, but I don't want a tight election.

Obama and Edwards can win geographically against Rudy and maybe Fred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fred is just a diversion, Mitt is the new * Lite. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the Republicans nominate Thompson, they're going to be wiped out
at many levels of state ballots.

I don't personally believe the fundamentalist Republican nutcase voter is going to be hogwild over Fred's wife. It's nobody's business but Fred and his wife's, but we're talking fundie nutbags here.

I think all of our people stomp Thompson in what will be a huge electoral college and popular vote landslide.

Fred Thompson has also-ran written all over him.

He's polling fairly well because the rest of the GOP field is a pack of macabre fools.

I guess Romney will buy his way to the nomination, but he isn't likely to do any better in the general than Thompson. Giuliani's a pathetic, monstrous, macho weasel with strong tendencies of a street thug, and McCain is a walking corpse.

I'd rate Huckabee and Brownback over Thompson at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If you think Jeri Thompson is a liability read this
From the Christian Broadcast Network, your basic fundies

Fred Thompson's Secret Weapon

From all accounts, Jeri Thompson is very smart and media savvy. She's been a media consultant and has worked in GOP circles for years. Talk about a top notch pairing! If Americans go for this, it could be two for the price of one. You get a conservative politician turned actor turned politician again...and you get a potential First Lady who could end up being one of the smartest and dynamic the country has ever seen. The Thompson's have two small children. (4 and 6 months old)

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/144288.aspx

She is 40 years old and an attorney, not "goldigger" material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hi, Ben. Yes, I know Jeri is A-OK, but again, the fundamentalist mindset
is not geared toward fair play.

I think they're going to look at Fred and Jeri and see a lecherous old coot who isn't that great of an actor and is some wayward mix of dirty old man and a conservative of fluid voting trends.

I think it's going to be a factor in whether they support Thompson or Huckabee or Brownback in the Iowa primary. If Romney places first in Iowa (he will), and either Huckabee or Brownback place second or a strong third, the incentive and rationale for a Thompson candidacy is dramatically weakened.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. thompson will be tough
guliani hasnt got a chance. i look at it like this. he was scared to death of running against hillary in new york. guliani is very unlikeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. *sigh* You are obviously a man
He's like 90 years old. His having 2 small children is more likely to elicit eeeews than awwwws. You may think Jeri is super neato but half of the voters are female and most of them are pretty damn tired of seeing rich old farts with women young enough to be their daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. You might be right if she was a
29 year old "blonde bimbo", But if this marriage has the blessing of Robertson I think the age diff will be over looked.
It would appear to me that it's Mrs. Fred rather than Fred himself that is pushing for and running this whole Thompson for pres. thing. If what we hear about him is correct, that he's lazy and not all that ambitious, then guess who the power behind the throne must be. A 40 year old attorney, former media consultant to the GOP who may just want to be 1st lady. I would actually be more concerned about her ambitions than his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Robertson (also a man BTW) can sign off on it all he wants
Women are really tired of being denigrated for getting older, while men continue to be considered viable. And it's the age difference, not her specific age that is the problem. And her being a successful attorney does not mitigate it, if anything it makes it worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Always AskWhy Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Does the same inference apply to
Dennis too?
After all Elizabeth Kucinich is 31 years younger and twice as tall as Dennis.
Just being 'fair and balanced' lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 01:47 PM
Original message
Actually, yes
Progressive women won't admit it openly but I've been in more than a few private conversations where the youth of Kucinich's wife was discussed in none too positive terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. At least among thje talk radio crowd...
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 11:14 AM by liberalpress
Fred Thompson is the second coming. Of course, understand that talk radio crowd is primarily a two-issue bunch.

Issue #1 Accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and live as He would have you live.

Issue #2 Try and kill as as many "Messicans" as you can before sundown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. McCain is going to skip Iowa. I think he'll skip Iowa only to be
whomped in New Hampshire a week or so later. That will end his campaign, if he hasn't pulled out by tomorrow at lunchtime.

He'd save himself a lot of ego-bruising and cash pay-outs if he wrapped it up by noon tomorrow.

Giuliani looked heroic atop that pile of rubble with the bullhorn, doing the America's Mayor bit, but it's been a while since those days, and the mood has shifted. The price for feeling patriotic includes the extremely painful cost of human lives and international shame, laid at the very feet of the man Rudy said he was glad to have in the Oval Office ("Thank God George Bush is in the White House.")

That war didn't quite go as planned and the pile of rubble Rudy's standing on now is his own political party. His numbers are slipping and he's widely perceived by the Right as strangely liberal on key social issues and by the Left as an inarticulate thug. He's a carrier of the end-of-career virus and doesn't know he's infected.

Romney wins in Iowa for the Thugs. He's got the cash and seems to know how to blur his ideology as he stomps through the pig farms extolling the virtues of ethanol. ("Gosh! I love America!")

Sam Brownback finishes second.

I think Romney, owing to his fat wallet, is the only one of the top three current Thug frontrunners who survives. Giuliani's decline will be slow and painful, and McCain might be out at any moment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Good point, but if Fred can come in 2nd in both Iowa and NH
- Mitt wins Iowa and NH. Fred can win out the rest of the primaries.

However, Rudy has a good shot at NH as well, and he can win big in NY, CA, and FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I see your point. What are the New Hampshire polls showing these
days? I thought Romney had surged ahead? Not sure about that, though.

If it comes down to Rudy and Romney, my god. Two entirely unacceptable candidates. Neither one has any business pretending to be a public servant.

The whole GOP pack looks kind of pathetic to me. No winners, no real electoral threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Fred can win SC and then win out
but only if Romney wins Iowa and NH - thus minimizing Rudy's support. If Fred can come in 2nd in NH - He will be very strong.

But Rudy or Romney will likely come in 1st and 2nd.

Never underestimate the GOP, that's why Hillary will be the worse Dem nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Where Romney will wind up is anyone's guess, although he seems
to appeal to an increasing number of GOP voters.

They can have him!

I expect Giuliani to fade. He's carrying around strange baggage and a kind of Bernie Kerik freak circus, and it just isn't going to play well with conservative/far-right primary voters. He's thick-tongued, too, and talks like a street thug. He seems like a local prosecutor who somehow wandered onto a national stage, and doesn't know what's going on.

If Michael Bloomberg enters the race as an independent, and Giuliani is the Republican nominee, Bloomberg takes the "moderate" GOP voters away from Rudy. Bloomberg won't jump in unless he plans to burn some serious cash, and he's a lot better executive and planner than hapless Rudy. The Democratic ticket, I predict, will win in Michigan and New Jersey -- to pick two fairly safe blue states -- but in a 3-way race, Giuliani stands a chance of finishing third. Bloomberg will make history, even in defeat, but the Republicans will be buried alive.

Brownback is running a campaign that the national media have mostly ignored, but he's in a position to make an exciting splash in Iowa. I'm still calling him second or third there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, I think it will be Newt Gingrich
Remember, I said it first. Or, if it isn't newtie,forget I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I do believe he will run.
I thought I saw him say that it's way too early to enter the race now, which means he has thought about it and is just waiting for the others to slip and fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineProgressive Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. You bet
We haven't heard that last from Newt... he will come into the race as a reborn centrist/pragmatist. Pro-environment, smaller gov't, etc. Don't underestimate his appeal to conservatives and independents.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtv1MuYTdZs

As I've said before, he's got MAJOR baggage. If Al gets in (and I all but know he will), Gore will win again. If it's Thompson or Newt versus Clinton or Obama, then all bets are off. Both Newt and Hillary have some serious baggage and it would be a real mudfest.

Be fun to watch, at least.... :beer:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. He's said he'll make his decision
around Labor Day. So we'll see. When his book came out a few months ago, there was a lot of talk about him running, but I don't know how much support he'll get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. If (when) Fred gets in he will win the nomination
It'll be Fred for the pukes and Hillary for us and I'm sad to say, I think Fred will win. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree with you
but then again I think Hillary would have a tough time with Brownback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timmy5835 Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. There is NO WAY Fred or any other.......
.....member of the GOP will win the White House in 2008. For that to happen the GOP would need a good number of liberal, progressive, and moderate voters. I don't see that hapening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Don't mistake people's dislike of bush as support for Democrats
The reason Thompson is dangerous is that he's a relatively fresh face. He can dismiss Iraq and all the other bush baggage as stuff belonging to "those other guys." As a blank slate people will see whatever they want to see in him and don't underestimate the power of him having been on tv for so long. That's a real electoral plus for him.

He's a much stronger candidate for the repubs than many are giving him credit for. Honestly I think he's the only repub that can win next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fred will not be a good general election candidate
for a whole host of reasons.

Rudy is their strongest bet.

If they nominate Fred, we win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think it will be a Thompson/Guilani ticket. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Possible, but I really don't know what Rudy can bring as a VP
and rudy also likes to be in charge, so i see him declining if offered. Also, Rudy can't win the swing states - it would make more sense for Fred to pick someone from or near a Swing state like Ohio or Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineProgressive Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I agree, JCrew. No Rudy as VP nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
21. No.
Fred Thompson won't get the nomination. The only reason he's in the race is that the rest of the pack has no appeal whatsoever. Mitt is the only real contender at this point b/c he has the money.

Giuliani will never get the nomination. He's pro-choice, pro-gun control, Catholic, pro-gay rights, is from Noo Yawk, & has a ton of baggage in his personal life. He won't play well in the Southern red states. His stance on guns alone will cost him the South. No one down here cares about anything but guns & taxes.

Also, Rudy has too big of an ego to play second fiddle to anyone, so I doubt he'll accept a VP slot. He goes back to NY on Feb. 6th, 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yes..
... as is the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. It totally doesn't matter. The Republicans can't win.
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 06:14 AM by Perry Logan
They shouldn't even put anyone up in 2008, the poor devils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hersheygirl Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. America is too vain to elect
either Fred or Rudy. Second, by the time idiot * gets done with his term and the mess he has made of everything, the people of this country won't trust another republican in the presidency for a long, long time. Once burned, twice shy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. If Fred wins then it is good news for Hillary, if you look at the
demographics and the trends in the polls then Thompson is probably the only Republican front runner that she has a chance to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
28. He's at least as lazy as his Law and Order chracter. Not a good fit for presidentail campagins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
29. No more than McCain was two years ago, or Guilani was
two months ago, or Romney was after the first quarter fundraising totals came in... Each of them - when they fully get in the race (and sound like they will continue every last program of Bushco) tanks shortly there after. I don't think it will be any different with Thompson. Heck his first stump appearance in NH was reportedly met with yawns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Thats a possibility - he might be a non-starter
if he does poorly on the stump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. What we know (right now)
Romney leads in Iowa and New Hampshire.
The Ghoul leads in Florida.
Thompson has slim leads in Nevada and South Carolina, so those states are actually too close to call. Thompson's main strength is the Deep South, he'll probably carry those states.
And Romney may carry enough states to deny the Ghoul enough delegates to win the nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. The first primary isn't for another six months and Thompson hasn't been in the race that long
I think we're still at the point in the race where back in 2004 Joementum was ahead in the polls. Things can change.

As time passes Mr. 9/11's numbers will go down as more of the conservative base become hip to his liberal-leaning views on social policy. Similarly, once the smear campaigns are in full-force against Romney's flip-flopping, Mormonism, and Taxachusettesness, his numbers will drop.

If Thompson runs a half decent campaign, he should win the nomination by default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
38. Obama has beaten Thompson hands down but, it's open on both sides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
40. Self delete
Edited on Sat Jul-14-07 11:03 PM by Redneck Socialist
too dumb to realize that I'd already replied to this post. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's Romney's to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
42. If it were possible, they'd all lose.
They're all duds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC