Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats insert Hate Crimes legislation into Defense Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 06:44 PM
Original message
Democrats insert Hate Crimes legislation into Defense Bill
I'm sorry for the link to the anti-gay bigots at LifeSite, but I haven't been able to find a better link yet.

Meanwhile, please understand the bias, lies and distortions:

Senate Democrats Sneak "Hate Crimes" Bill into Crucial Defense Bill
Would hold US troops fighting "War on Terror" as hostages in exchange for sweeping "hate crimes" legislation

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 13, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Senate Democrats will hold US troops fighting the "War on Terror" as hostages in exchange for sweeping "hate crimes" legislation if the Senate votes this week, perhaps as early as Monday, to include it in the defense spending bill.

Instead of introducing the legislation giving sexual orientation "hate crimes" protection as a separate bill, Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Gordon Smith (R-OR) opted to introduce the "Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act" as one of hundreds of amendments to the Defense Reauthorization bill requested by President Bush.

"There's no question this is an attempt to sneak the bill in under the most shameful circumstances because they are attaching it to the defense of our military troops," Mat Staver, founder of the Liberty Counsel told LifeSiteNews.com.

Sens. Kennedy and Smith's strategy, Staver said, forces the President into a terrible dilemma: President Bush must either approve "hate crimes" legislation or veto the entire spending bill thus leaving US troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan without new support and dwindling resources. Since the President has no line-item veto, approval of the defense bill is an all or nothing deal.

More:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07071305.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good idea. I'm for it. It SHOULD be in the Defense bill.
When you pledge to fight for the country, you pledge to fight for everyone in it.

That includes LGBTQ folks as well. If the Pentagon is instructing its soldiers not to fight for everyone's freedoms, they should inform the Commander-in-Chief immediately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Most o fthe nation is for overturning "Don't ask/don't tell" --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-14-07 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Whether he signs it or not, it raises attention to both issues.

Eight of the nine GOP candidates blew off the debate hosted by the NAACP. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3375891 The core of their party fought their own president against providing ANY path to legal status for more than ten million immigrants. They are racist, homophobes. And while we continue to fund this war which they started partly in the name of Christian bigotry and hatred, it is more than appropriate to tie the issues together, and raise them both as aspects of the same problem.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC