Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$532,000 Of Obama Campaign Contributions Went To Fund-raising Firm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 06:49 AM
Original message
$532,000 Of Obama Campaign Contributions Went To Fund-raising Firm
http://bostonnow.com/community/blogs/oldmole/2007/07/17/532000-of-obama-campaign-contributions-went-to-pay-cambridge-fund-raising-firm/

7/18/07

Who Rules Massachusetts?

Alternative news about Massachusetts power structure, Harvard, MIT and other elite institutions in Massachusetts.


$532,000 Of Obama Campaign Contributions Went To Pay Cambridge Fund-raising Firm

In a December 28, 2003 press release, titled “Donors Warned About Professional Funddraisers,” the office of New York State’s then-Attorney General Spitzer reported that Spitzer’s 2002 annual report on the fund-raising activities of non-profit corporations in New York State showed that “less than a third of the money raised by professional telemarketing campaigns actually goes to charity.” The New York Attorney General’s 2002 “Pennies For Charity” report also identified the Massachusetts-based Integral Resources as one of “the professional fundraisers whose campaigns yielded the least amount to charity–on average 12 percent or less of the funds raised.”

In 2002, according to Spitzer’s annual report, only $32,954 (8.4 percent) of the $393,372 that Integral Resources raised in New York State went to the non-profit charities for which it was fund-raising. Two years later, the NY Attorney General’s “Pennies For Charity’ annual report also revealed that only $135,996 (18.78 percent) of the $723,980 that Integral Resources raised in New York State in 2004 actually went to the charities for which Integral Resources was fund-raising.

Coincidentally, between April 1, 2007 and June 30,2007, the Obama for America presidential campaign paid Integral Resources $532,810 of the campaign contributions it collected, according to financial records filed at the Federal Elections Commission. Integral Resources’ corporate headquarters are located at 815 Somerville Ave. in Cambridge, Massachusetts, near Porter Square. The CEO of Integral Resources, Ron Rosenblith, was the chief of staff of Democratic Massachusetts Senator John Kerry’s campaign during the 1980s and also worked on Kerry’s unsuccessful 2004 prresidential campaign.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks.
You just gave me another reason to vote against Hillary, and for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. This meaningless hit piece by desperate Team Clinton brought to you by...
...people who support a cheating husband and a wife who needs him for validity. Desperation, a dirty fragrance.

How the very successful Obama campaign spends its money on strategic moves is pretty much up to them. They spent money on a company that offers fundraising strategy...Oh my God! How dare they!

:crazy:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Really. I mean...fucking big deal. Obama raises $!
:wow: ... :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Team Clinton is in cahoots with an alternative newspaper?
Paranoia strikes deep I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The point is...
...that a Clinton supporter finds the time to post an article (with an overuse of the bold format) of a non-story to use as some way to trash the candidate and somehow make the person be persuaded to go for another candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Because an Obama or Edwards supporter never did that before.
C'mon, its gonna be a long primary season.

Feel free to call a shitty article well...shitty but to ascribe motivations to any group of candidate supporters is just plain silly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Sen. Obama is a presidential candidate and will come under the same scrutiny as everyone else.
Edited on Wed Jul-18-07 12:48 PM by Alamom


If you thought he would not, you were wrong. If this story is untrue, produce the facts and debunk it. There was more than one source so I assume it is true.

If it's a non story, why post to it? Why are you bothered?

It is not a personal attack in any way. It's a news article. News articles will be posted.
Most of the other candidates have been under the microscope before, now Sen. Obama is,

get use to it.


edsp







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Exactly. Some think Obama should be exempt from scrutiny. This is a campaign, not a coronation... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. LOL
zing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good - I am glad Obama is continuing to fund raise. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. And?\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. And it's been an enormously successful strategy
In fact, I believe I'll make another donation right now. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. guess what. All candidates have 'bundlers' big whip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC