Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Group (Judicial Watch) sues for access to Hillary’s White House records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:12 AM
Original message
Group (Judicial Watch) sues for access to Hillary’s White House records
Edited on Wed Jul-18-07 11:15 AM by babylonsister
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/group-seeks-access-to-hillarys-white-house-records-2007-07-18.html

Group seeks access to Hillary’s White House records
By Klaus Marre
July 18, 2007

The watchdog group Judicial Watch revealed Wednesday that it is suing for access to documents from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) time as first lady.

The documents include Clinton’s daily office diary, her telephone logbook and her schedule.

More than a year ago, the group filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, which operated the Clinton Presidential Library records, but did not get access to the documents.

“This lawsuit is a first step in obtaining access to new documents about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Clinton White House,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “With Hillary Clinton aggressively pursuing the presidency, uncovering the truth about her activities in the White House is just as relevant today as it was during the Clinton era.”

The group filed its lawsuit Monday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

“Given Mrs. Clinton’s current status as a presidential candidate, if not the front-runner for the Democratic Party’s nomination, the public interest in her tenure as First Lady is undeniable,” the lawsuit stated. “Because Mrs. Clinton seeks our nation’s highest office and may well be the next President of the United States, the public interest weighs heavily in favor of enjoining the Library from continuing to withhold the records at issue.”

From wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

Judicial Watch is an American government watchdog organization founded in 1994.<1> The group uses litigation as its primary tool and came to public attention after filing eighteen lawsuits against the administration of Democratic U.S. President Bill Clinton and figures in the Clinton administration. The organization was the first to expose John Huang's illegal fund-raising activities relating to the 1996 United States campaign finance controversy (also known as Chinagate).<2>

They have also received a great deal of funding from Clinton critics, including $7.74 million from conservative anti-Clinton billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife.<3> This led Clinton administration officials to accuse them of "abusing the judicial system for partisan ends".<4>

More recently, Judicial Watch has also sued the George W. Bush administration for access to minutes of Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force<5> and has also sued the Secret Service to force the release of logs detailing corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff's visits to the White House.<6>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Judicial Watch lawsuit #1,344, 267
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. do what Bush and cheney do
ignore it and invoke executive privilege
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sounds like a plan!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is this a new version of the swift boat attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. When this so called bi-partisan watch group
does stuff like this we know that the republicans have started their swiftboating against Hillary.

Maybe they have a right to her records who knows. But with all the corruption and crookedness of Rudi (the fireman ought to know) Romney, Thompson (hell look at his senate record with the lobbyist he is connected to) and all the rest of the republican candidates, why pick on Hillary. She has been under attack from the right for 15 years, haven't they run thru all the stuff they can think of by now.

And if Obama or Edwards were the front runners, what you want to bet they would bend over back wards with their nose up bush's ass trying to find something negative on them, while letting the right run scott free. Shame calling them self bi-partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another day ...
Another Judicial Watch attack on the Clintons. This is just part of the plan to scare Americans away from electing Hillary ... "If you elect Clinton, it'll be non-stop 24/7/365 attacks, investigations, smears ... just like during Bill's term."

imo the fact that groups like this hate the Clinton's so deeply is the best endorsement they could possibly get. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Judicial Watch's Greatest Hits!
* Suing the town of Herndon, Virginia to stop a "day laborer" program on the grounds that it may provide employment for illegal aliens.

* Suing the U.S. Senate to disallow the filibuster in their debates over confirmation of judicial nominees, coinciding with proposed efforts by Republican Senate leaders to internally do the same thing.

* Initiating a request to the Naval Inspector General for an investigation into the "legitimacy and propriety" of the awards John Kerry received for his service in Vietnam.

* Condemning as "murder" the death of Terri Schiavo, who lived for 15 years in a diagnosed persistent vegetative state and whose husband wished to allow to die. Her parents wished that she be kept on life support, and were joined in their pursuits by prominent Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wait a minute ... aren't Republicans against frivolous lawsuits?
hmm ... why don't they press the issue of Cheney's 2/2001 meeting guest list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary should say, you show me yours and I'll show you mine
In other words, if Bush/Cheney open their books and records I will open mine. We know who Judicial Watch is... Hillary and Bill have got to be prepared for this sort of trashing by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is one reason I don't support her run.
Judicial watch has it in for her and for Bill, and these "lawsuits" are all we're hear about the entire campaign instead of the issues.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC