Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Re)Call the Doctor: Physicians Involved in CIA Interrogations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 03:45 PM
Original message
(Re)Call the Doctor: Physicians Involved in CIA Interrogations?


http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/

(Re)Call the Doctor: Physicians Involved in CIA Interrogations?
By Spencer Ackerman - July 23, 2007, 2:39 PM

Blink and you'll miss it. But yesterday on Meet The Press, Admiral Michael McConnell, director of national intelligence, seemingly disclosed something long suspected but never proven about the CIA's "enhanced interrogation" techniques: interrogators receive advice from medical personnel in conducting their interrogations. When it came to light two years ago that psychiatrists and psychologists helped prepare interrogations at Guantanamo Bay, the revelation caused a huge scandal in the psychiatric community -- something that now looks set to repeat itself with physicians.

McConnell appeared on Tim Russert's Sunday chat show to reassure viewers that President Bush's new executive order for CIA interrogations prohibits torture. He stuck to that line consistently throughout his interview, but during one quick moment of elaboration, McConnell, perhaps inadvertently, disclosed something extremely significant:

When I was in a situation where I had to sign off, as a member of the process, my name to this executive order, I sat down with those who had been trained to do it, the doctors who monitor it, understanding that no one is subjected to torture. (Emphasis added)

Until now, no confirmation existed that "doctors monitored" CIA interrogations -- or indeed took part in any aspect of them.
Continue reading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. They should
be stripped of their liscences to practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. So instead of the Hypocratic Oath, they took the Hypocritic one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, they've been doing this...........
it's a step backward, and it leaves me wondering about things like ethics, hypocrisy, and just plain old cruelty.

It's a step backward.

By the way, it was covred in the Guardian......um. Last year, I think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC