Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPMCafe: Do Polls Back Up Hillary's Campaign's Contention about 2002 War Authorization?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:13 AM
Original message
TPMCafe: Do Polls Back Up Hillary's Campaign's Contention about 2002 War Authorization?
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 08:36 AM by flpoljunkie
Do Polls Back Up Hillary Campaign's Contention About 2002 War Authorization? No.

Mark Blumenthal deconstructs a claim by Hillary Clinton advisor Howard Wolfson. Appearing on Hardball yesterday, Wolfson alleged that many Americans (Wolfson "naive" figure--80%!) shared Hillary's professed belief that President Bush would take the Iraq authorization and use it as diplomatic leverage, exhausting the alternatives before going to war. In fact, Blumenthal says, polling in November 2002 showed that 58% of Americans believed the president had already made the firm decision to invade Iraq.

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/jul/27/happy_hour_roundup

July 27, 2007
Unspinning Howard Wolfson*

http://www.pollster.com/blogs/unspinning_howard_wolfson.php

Earlier today on Hardball, MSNBC's Chris Matthews had the following exchange with Howard Wolfson, communications director for the Clinton campaign (my transcript below the video): Click link above for the must see video

Matthews: How would you describe position in voting to authorize the war in Iraq believing we weren't going to war, that Bush really didn't intend to go to war. Was that naive?

Wolfson: Look, she's taken responsibility for the vote. She's been asked about this...

Mathews: Wouldn't you call that naive to believe...

Wolfson: No...

Matthews: ...that we're not going to war when everybody thought we were going to war? I thought we were going to war.

Wolfson: I guess 80 percent of the country was naive then.

Matthews: They didn't think Bush would take us to war?

Wolfson: I think people were, believed George Bush was going to do what he said he was going to do, which was to try diplomacy. And he didn't.

Matthews: Anybody who didn't think we were going to war, in the months leading up to the war in Iraq, wasn't paying attention.

Did 80% of Americans believe that President Bush would "try diplomacy" in an effort to avoid a war with Iraq?

Not exactly.

I checked the Iraq archives at the Polling Report. Most of the questions asked in late 2002 focused on whether and under what conditions Americans would support going to war. However, a CNN/USA Today/Gallup survey of 1,017 adults conducted November 22-24, 2002 (a month after the vote to authorize the use of military force in Iraq), showed that a majority of Americans believed President Bush had "already decided" to invade Iraq:
Which comes closer to your view about President Bush? Bush has already decided to invade Iraq and has agreed to UN inspections mainly to gain international support for that action. OR, Bush has not yet decided whether to invade Iraq and has agreed to UN inspections mainly to determine if an invasion of Iraq were necessary.

58% - Bush has already decided to invade
38% - Bush has not yet decided whether to invade
4% - No opinion

A bit of context on the timing: The U.S. Senate passed the resolution authorizing the use of military force against Iraq on October 11, 2002 (with Senator Clinton voting in favor). President Bush signed it into law on October 16. Three weeks later, on November 8, the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441 urging Iraq to "comply with its disarmament obligations" or face "serious consequences." Iraq agreed to the resolution on November 13, and under its terms, U.N. weapons inspectors were set to return to Iraq on November 27 after a four year absence to conduct onsite inspections in search of weapons of mass destruction.

Gallup fielded its survey on November 22-24, just days before the return of the U.N. inspectors, a time when one might expect optimism regarding the use of diplomacy to resolve the conflict. Yet even then, 58% of Americans believed the President had "already decided to invade Iraq."
*With apologizes to Frank Newport, who has made "unspinning" questionable assertions about public opinion on Sunday morning talk shows a regular staple of his Gallup Guru blog.

-- Mark Blumenthal

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Didn't Believe Bush Would Try Diplomacy
any more than he would start speaking English. He has no skill or mastery of either.

Bush is born, bred and raised a bully. It is his life's work and his only pleasure. He's not going to suddenly take up diplomacy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. And polls should matter here...why? As a measure of getting 'her' message across, yes, ....
about accurate knowledge of the vote? No.

That's not what polls do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know of anyone who didn't believe we were going to war
I had never that spin until Wolfson said that on Hardball.

Wolfson lied. If Hillary had that view she was definately naive and it's irresponsible for her to continue with this lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes. Raise your hands DUers, if you were part of Howard Wolfson's clueless 80% who trusted Bush.
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 08:49 AM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, they don't. And even more to the point, we expect our leaders
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 09:32 AM by Benhurst
to be better informed, not less, than the public as a whole. Millions had already taken to the streets against the planned illegal and immoral invasion. Why were Clinton and our other "leaders" so far behind the curve on such an important issue?

Wolfson and other Clinton advisers should stop trying to excuse her bad call on this and move on, hoping the electorate is willing to forgive her lack of judgment or political courage, whichever the case may be.

And the same goes for most of our other "leaders" as well.

At least John Edwards has apologized. Clinton should do the same and move on. Otherwise her lack of good judgment in 2002 will look less like a lapse than a pattern, a continuing one at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. But they were privy to secret information!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wolfson is a smarmy, Fox-News liar. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOVA_Dem Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. SNL deconstructed Hillary Clinton perfectly...
"I think my supporters know my support for the war was always insincere."
http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2007/01/hillary.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Absolutely! Awesome video! Had somehow missed it this past January, 2007. Thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOVA_Dem Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I can't anyone on here missed it. It was all over the cable shows. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What can I say. Don't think I miss much, but somehow missed this--tho I am no longer a SNL fan
since they caved on criticizing Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. what a shock! Just like bush Hillary and her campaign rewrite history!
who would vote for more of the same? :e,yes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC