Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IL-03: The right kind of primary challenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:38 AM
Original message
IL-03: The right kind of primary challenge
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/6/14/114953/858

This should be a race to watch:


Democrats upset by how Rep. Daniel Lipinski (D-Ill.) acquired his seat and what he’s done with it will give the second-termer another primary challenge in 2008.

Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney Mark Pera has filed papers with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), and yesterday told The Hill that he will announce his candidacy for Lipinski’s seat after July 4.

Lipinski won his seat in 2004 after his father, Rep. William Lipinski, decided not to run for reelection after having won the Democratic primary. In a move that has not sat well with some Democrats, the younger Lipinski, a political science professor in Tennessee who had not lived in the state for years, was nominated to replace his father with no opposition.

He sailed through the general election in a solidly Democratic district that contains southwest Chicago and its suburbs.

Daniel Lipinski’s detractors contend that he is out of sync with the district on social issues — he is socially conservative on issues such as abortion and stem cell research — and he has riled the liberal base with what it sees as his continued support for the Iraq war.


I'll be interested in seeing how the Illinois netroots handles this. There's no reason that a pro-war, anti-abortion, and anti-stem cell research, carpetbagging beneficiary of gross nepotism should be representing this particular district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have a problem from the get-go of anyone "sliding in" to replace
a candidate that won a primary. JMHO, if the winning primrary candidate drops, they should figure out a way to hold another election with fairness to the candidates.

It just seems both disingenuous and underhanded that the voters are basically disenfranchised in this way. If an election can't be held, for one reason or another, then the #2 gets the nod. Again...JMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Illinois politics-particularly
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 03:41 AM by EST
Chicago politics, particularly Chicago democratic politics, has been crookeder than the proverbial dog's hind leg since time immemorial.
The fix has been "in" since I have been here, nearly thirty years, now.
This type of obviously underhanded, pragmatic nepotism is, though choking to anyone who is not directly involved, is still disgustingly legal.
When considered in a larger context, it is almost a miracle that there is as much integrity in the system as now exists.
Consider:
In any sufficiently large population, four percent of that population is psychopathic.

People who feel that government is a thing we created to handle jobs that were too big, too dirty, too hard, too detailed for us to do ourselves and that government exists to aid the people and make life better, safer or happier and more fulfilling, tend to congregate and take note of their liberal, walk a mile in the other guy's shoes similarities.
Those people often call themselves democrats and the democratic party is coming, albeit painfully, to mean ethics and square dealing. There is a general acknowledgment that the tasks assigned to "government" are those that are too unprofitable to expect private enterprise to do.

I may be a purist but I cannot see anyone who is inclined to try to look at things from the other person's point of view as particularly likely to misuse, abuse, hurt and all the other shameful actions endemic to a point of view that invalidates other people. Psychopaths (to the extent that they are political) and the people who are somewhat demented and just all around mean-the ones who make up the other twenty six of the bottom thirty percent-are not going to feel comfortable here, although they can readily find victims here.

It's no secret-if someone is caught molesting his secretary's minor child, he is no democrat. If it should happen that he/she is wearing a "d" on its sleeve, there's an automatic suspicion that they can't be honest in that arena, either.

Sometimes I even wonder if we can ever actually elect a real democrat to high office, because the cutthroat tactics they have to use to attain that office and the corrupting influences on the way and when they get there changes them so that they often don't much resemble the "themselves" that they started with. They all become republicans to some degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC