Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Although Bush blamed Iran, insurgents armed with weapons purchased by American's tax money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:14 PM
Original message
Although Bush blamed Iran, insurgents armed with weapons purchased by American's tax money
GAO Says: 30 Percent Of Weapons U.S. Gave Iraqi Troops Missing
August 6, 2007 11:13 a.m. EST
Linda Young - AHN News Writer
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008117851

Washington, D.C. (AHN) - About 30 percent of all weapons the United States military gave to Iraqi forces since 2004 to train and equip troops are missing, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office. Missing are 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and semiautomatic pistols that officials fear might have ended up in the hands of insurgents fighting against U.S. troops.

<<snip>>

The GAO report called distribution of U.S. weapons to Iraqi forces haphazard, rushed and in violation of established procedures, BBC news reported Monday.

<<snip>>

Although the Bush administration has blamed Iran for equipping Iraqi insurgents, the lack of a way to identify United States property means that the U.S. military has no way of knowing if that is the case, or if American soldiers are battling insurgents who are armed with weapons purchased by American's tax money.

"They really have no idea where they are," Rachel Stohl, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information, told the Washington Post. Stohl has studied small-arms trade and received Pentagon briefings on the issue. "It likely means that the United States is unintentionally providing weapons to bad actors."

In addition to that, the Post reported that while Bush worried about non-existent weapons of mass destruction he did not secure the small arms in Iraq, which have likely gone to insurgents fighting U.S. troops. In addition to that, the Bush administration has not acted to control the loss of U.S. weapons to insurgents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. "let freedom reign!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. We have met the enemy, and he is us --- at least, supplied by us. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, hell, I guess we're just gonna have to bomb ourselves.
Life is troublesome in George Bush's Amurica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. So why weren't these U.S. arms so we'd know for sure when they were used
against us? I know the real answer.

To make it harder to prove we are arming both sides to keep the war going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because the U.S. doesn't make military AK-47's,
Edited on Tue Aug-07-07 11:29 AM by benEzra
So why weren't these U.S. arms so we'd know for sure when they were used against us? I know the real answer.

To make it harder to prove we are arming both sides to keep the war going.

Because the U.S. doesn't make military AK-47's, only non-automatic civilian variants, and those are made in very small numbers (most U.S. civilian AK's are imported).

Iraqi troops are all trained on military AK's, and all the rifles they currently have are AK's, so introducing U.S. Stoner-pattern rifles (M16, M4) into the mix would be a logistical and training nightmare. U.S. rifles are more of a pain to maintain in dusty conditions, as well. So we bought AK's from Poland, which makes really good ones.

You can still tell the difference between a U.S. contract AK-47 and an indigenous Iraqi AK-47, because the U.S.-supplied models are made in Poland, and the Iraqi ones were made elsewhere (my guess would be China and Romania, possibly with some antique Russian ones mixed in).

"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." --Hanlon's Razor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC