Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Hillary wants to fight a new war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:08 PM
Original message
So Hillary wants to fight a new war
This woman can't make up her mind weather she wants troops out of Iraq or wants to keep them in a some kind of combat setting . JESUS CHRIST!!!!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLXso2HnGwI&eurl=
YouTube - Hillary Clinton - The Surge is Working, Prepare for New War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does she have name for her New War?
they could use "Operation Irainan Liberation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. are you suggesting another O.I.L. war?
i think she might just support that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Haven't watched the youtube link yet...I will....but aside from that
I have been concerned for two to three weeks with Hillary's military stance. I don't think she'll end the war as fast as most of us would like....and what is her stance on Iran? She scares me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I have to agree
I am looking forward to someone standing up and saying they are going to bring our troops home, period. Petraeus is about to present a sparkling report about how well the new surge is going, we all knew that before he even set foot over there. She is borderline with her words and I also don't think she would withdraw the troops right away either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Preparing to fight the new war" (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Amazing how some people will take a 15 second clip and presume to know what
it's all about. So what was the context?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Figures some supporter would respond with an excuse the fact is she...
said we have to prepare for the new WAR plain and simple you Hillary supporters need to ask her what new war is she talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm no Hillary supporter, but YOU'RE WRONG:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Changed Tactics = Surge
What other changed tactics has there been? The 'surge' is what has changed, so there isn't anything else she could be referring to. Besides that, the al Anbar Sunnis haven't reconciled with Shiites and Kurds, so there's no political progress anyway, and that was the goal of the surge, er, changed tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. ON TERRORISM ON TERRORISM TERRORISM
If you are going to post...don't pick and choose post what was said. She said the war on terrorism...and of course those jealous that Hillary leads their candidate picked out part of the quote and did what the republicans do...WAR ON TERRORISM.............WAR ON TERRORISM..........THINK YOU GOT THE WHOLE THINK NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I didn't hear anything about terrorism and if she did say it that republican talk if...
you ask me. so she basically is for some sort of military action some place which is what i am sick and tired of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's be fair now. This is a short clip taken out of context.
At the same time, Hillary has accused Obama of being naive. I think Hillary is naive if she thinks Bush's surge is working. Nothing he has ever done has "worked." It's all smoke and mirrors, illusion. The only rabbits Bush has pulled out of the hat were rats in disguise. The only thing he has done well is steal elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. sorry, bigdarryl. Not everyone believes the war on terrorism is a bumber sticker slogan
Edited on Tue Aug-21-07 05:17 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. well send your fucking kid to fight then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. To fight those who would kill me simply because I'm American... you bet your ass I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah and your probably one of those who went after Obama by saying if Osama Bin Lauden ...
is in Pakistan and if the country doesn't respond he will as President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. If you think I am, show me a quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Tsk, tsk...shame, shame, shame on you. Carrying Drudge's water. Surely this was
an inadvertent accident, and you didn't MEAN to be inaccurate, or deliberately false, one would hope...because if you did it on purpose, you really should be ashamed.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1633617
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. He's just using a play out of Obamas play book.
Some people never learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Credibility should be something you'd want to peserve.....
here at DU.

This ain't the way.

This is Drudge's work, and it ain't right for you to carry it over to here.

No one claiming to be a Democrat should be that desperate to undermine the campaign of a candidate. Quoting out of context is not an acceptable method of debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. More anti-Hillary spin.
As I posted on another thread:

She's saying that when you're in a war, you don't fight the previous one, you have to fight the "new" one (the one you're in presently) because it's a completely different situation. She's talking about TACTICS.

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. The comments about it working aren't the issue.
The real question is what is the "new war" she's talking about? I'd like to hear her say,specifically (for once),what she meant by that.The war or terror? A war with Iran? Pakistan? What?

I haven't read anything after that,so if she went on to explain it could someone tell me what she said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I think she was referring to the idea that a war on transnational
terrorism can't be fought in a conventional way, ie; invading and occupying other countries.

It's an idea that's been advanced before by others - the idea that this "new" war would be more of a police than a military action. That was my take, anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. That is my impression as well.
But it's something I'd like to see her,and any others who think this,clarify.As we can see,the vagueness leads to a lot of hoopla,and clarification would put a stop to at least some of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. That's a wishful spin
But that isn't what she said. Kerry never dumped bombs like that when he was talking about variations in fighting terrorism. It sounded like she was signaling to these vets that she was on board with the idea that we were going to have to fight lots of ground wars in this war on terror. Kerry never said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. they're equally important
I want to know what the hell she meant was working, because we just lost more troops in Al Anbar today. And I do want to know what her 'new war' talk was about at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. I do not think she was talking about a new war but The new war
the pentagon is always fighting the last war, right now they are fighting the vietnam war. Often they cannot face the loss of a war so they will fight on endlessly even starting a war in a new place. This is nothing new, the war of 1812 is said to be the English trying to refight the Revolutionary war to get another result. Actually if you can understand Sen Clinton's code, she is saying we need to pull out and face the fact that we have lost and stop trying to fight the last war and prepare for the war we cannot forsee. IMHO, anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. That is always phrased "the next war"
She could have just misspoke. That is what made the sentence so strange, it was not the norm for anything that's been discussed so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. a desperate, ridiculous exercise in word-twisting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillary has no stands. She panders and is an opportunitst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Are you a parrot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC