The American people will not elect a crybaby as Commander-in-Chief

Whining that an unscientific poll wasn't kept on a website forever isn't a sign that your campaign is going well:

http://www.dennis4president.com/go/homepage-items/kucinich-campaign-is-awaiting-abc-news-explanations-for-its-actions/

is rather unbecomming. We get it Dennis. You're not in the top tier. Sorry.

...the poll was actually taken down and replaced with a fresh poll, which smacks of media bias. I think it was worthy of note.

We should all condemn that.

What were you expecting them to replace it with, a ham sandwich?

...it was replaced with a new poll asking the exact same question.

"Who won the Democratic debate"

"Who is winning the Democratic debate?"

The first one was posted immediately after Sunday's debate. As Sunday's debate was the most recent one, it is reasonable to assume that they are referring to that one.

The second poll was posted on Tuesday. Instead of using the past tense, it uses the present progressive. A reasonable person would conclude that this question refers not to one specific event in the past, but the ongoing debate process. Either Kuicnich can't read or the man is grasping at straws.

Ooops, my bad!

:shrug:

It's an online poll where each candidate's supporters can blitz it to put their candidate on top. Kucinich supporters blitzed the poll, now Kucinich is crying about there being two polls.

I don't see Obama, Clinton and Edwards supporters crying over how Kucinich supporters blitzed the poll to put their guy on top. They've got more important things to deal with.

A "crybaby"? --- By all means, none of THOSE in THIS Party!

A "crybaby" might leave Impeachment ON the table -- where it belongs.

A "crybaby" would never concede an election until the fraud he KNEW was there was exposed.

A "crybaby" would have gone to the well of the Congress and never stopped shouting until New Orleans and her people were saved from the disaster that was Katrina.

A "crybaby" wouldn't stand for a Constitution that was being raped and demolished right out in the open for all to see.

A "crybaby" would never allow a Woman's Right to Choose to be denied her.

A "crybaby" would never stand for an America where only SOME people could marry for love.

A "crybaby" would scream at the top of his or her lungs until EVERY American occupying Iraq was brought home, every veteran had the care he or she deserved, and every country that used to be an ally of ours trusted and respected us again.

A "crybaby" would never stand for undereducated, undernourished, and homeless children while screaming about the "rights" of those yet to be born.

A "crybaby" would never stand for the lack of seperation between Church and State.

A "crybaby" would decry War and work for Peace.

A "crybaby" might try to end our dependence on oil, and demand we fix the environment.

A "crybaby" would scream and stomp until we started fixing the U.S. infrastructure, inner-city schools, and paying down the deficit instead of destroying Iraq.

A "crybaby" would never stand for being disrespected and marginalized by a complicit Corporate Media.

A "crybaby" is what we used to PROUDLY call a REAL Democrat. But, those days are gone, I guess. Now we rely on being the "paler" Republican. We don't want any "crybabies" representing us, nosir. We want a groin-thrusting, fist-pounding, war-mongering, corporate-ass-kissing, bad-ass just like those damned Republicans elect.... just not SO Republican, but just Republican enough. That'll show their sorry asses!

Yeah! -- That's the ticket!

TC

I appreciate that.


TC

Are you saying that Kucinich used to be a crybaby before he flip-flopped on abortion?

and flip-flopping??

He hasn't changed it back, so I would say he's grown and learned and come to see things differently.

Have you never changed your opinion on anything??

Least DK has gone the right direction.

I think THIS deserves its own thread. ;)

TC

He changed his position just before running for President. Sounds a lot like a certain former Governor of Massachusettes.

I see it as changing his perspective rather than flip-flopping, but call it what you will.

TC

Really -

Kucinich pointed out blatent media bias - He's not supposed to do that? You got to be kidding me.

Certainly better than the OP here.

Who's the one making this a bfd here on GD-Pol?

Well its not the Kucinich supporters.....

:hi: TC

DR

After the results of that survey showed Congressman Kucinich winning handily, ABC News, sometime Monday afternoon, replaced the original survey with a second survey asking "Who is winning the Democratic debate?"


From your own provided link.
====

"Whining" is a little ugly a charge to make, isn't it?

:shrug:

Namely a lightning rod for national issues the party won't touch, while standing close enough to the party tent to keep certain activists in the fold, but far enough not to set it on fire or make donors faint. Like Alan Keyes he dubs the mainstream repub-lite, tosses red meat to the choir, and is an embarrassment to the leadership but still gets brought on stage whenever the party seeks rapprochement with the faithful (regarding the failure to impeach or immediately withdraw from Iraq, or Keyes trying to explain why abortion is still legal after n years of total republican domination). Thus attacking Kucinich as a presidential candidate seems like a useless expenditure of energy at best; he isn't a threat, and neither are the one-issue voters we need to eke out victories. If this were a parliamentary democracy we'd beseech the Parti du Monster Loonies to join our coalition, but instead we need them to vote for us directly.

He does serves a good purpose even if he and his campaign/supporters make me roll my eyes sometime.

Nah, he's making them look like the DLCish fieds that they are.

I hope that he keeps up the good work.

Looks like you're out too.

Kucinich won't be nominated IMO, but I will give him the respect he deserves for fighting the good fight.

This is not libel, search the archives.

I am no longer a supporter of him.

Search the archives.

Kucinich is fighting the good fight and he deserves credit for raising the issues other Dems don't want to talk about.

Which is exactly what Kucinich is doing this for, to raise awareness and call the media on their manipulative tactics. Hell, an overwhelming number of Americans think that the media is biased, sounds like once again Dennis is spot on the issue.

:shrug:

how some people have gotten so upset about a fucking online poll.
Newsflash: It means nothing!!!!
You DK supporters have much bigger fish to fry.

Guess what - the "corporate media" is not conspiring to hold your
guy down, he's got about 1-2% support.

Maybe you guys should all meet up at the Grassy Knoll and discuss.
I'm a nice guy, Ill even drop by with do-nuts. Wait, no,
make that soy milk and granola.

There was some real outrage with ABC.

This is a sign that his campaign is going very well.

The results of the primaries showed otherwise.

Is that why's he's polling at 1% - 2%?

Oh wait, that's the corporate media, he's really WAY
ahead, right?

to death with this constant, daily barrage of nasty against Kucinich? You did this the last time too. Good lord, you don't even have to think of anything new, this is all recycled bullshit.

Maybe you enjoy being a jerk? I simply do not get the anger against him or his supporters. WTF? It is mean and nasty to post shit like this, do you really enjoy this? If so it is no wonder you don't like him, he is your polar opposite.

You mean like Kucinich's joke of a campaign?