Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romney flip flops on abortion again - "I would let states make their choices."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:07 PM
Original message
Romney flip flops on abortion again - "I would let states make their choices."
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:


Romney Muddles Abortion Stance
Republican Contender Once Again Favors States on Abortion Rights
By TEDDY DAVIS
Aug. 22, 2007
LOS ANGELES, CA —

Mitt Romney has once again changed his position on whether states should be allowed to retain abortion rights.

Two weeks after indicating to ABC News' George Stephanopoulos on "Good Morning America" that his abortion position goes beyond reversing Roe vs. Wade and includes support for a human life amendment to the Constitution as well as federal legislation that would bring the unborn under the protections of the 14th Amendment, Romney said Tuesday that he supports letting states make their own choices about abortion  a position that would be impossible if his "GMA" abortion position were implemented.

"My view is that the Supreme Court has made an error in saying at the national level one size fits all for the whole nation," Romney told Jon Ralston in a televised interview. "Instead, I would let states make their choices."

Asked by Ralston whether it was "OK" with him that Nevada is a "pro-choice state," Romney said, "I'd let states make their own decision in this regard. My view, of course, is I'm a pro-life individual. That's the position I support. But, I'd let states have this choice rather than let the federal government have it."

http://www.abcnews.go.com/print?id=3511448
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. damn, it's like he's providing cover for Giuliani
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. "states rights" is a euphemism for "i don't want to tell you what i would really do"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yep
I remember in the 2000 primaries, a reporter asked Governor Bush about abortion and Roe v Wade. He said something like "it should be up to the legislature to decide, and not the Supreme Court". The reporter then asked, "well, OK, what do you think legislatures should do?" Bush then coyly said "well that would be up to the legislature".

These antiabortionists say they are for states rights, and I'm sure that's what they believe in the short-run. If they get their way and RvW is overturned, perhaps 30 states will outlaw abortion, but perhaps 20 or more will not. That will not be OK with the antiabortionist crowd. Then the will demand federal legislation, and/or a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion everywhere. In the long-run, they do not favor states rights on the abortion issue at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. correct, they pick and choose issues that are of concern to "Value voters"
talk about having your values fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. So will this plan work like the medical marijuana initiatives?
That is, the states "decide" and then the feds come in a bust everyone anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. of course not, but you knew that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. But he stands FIRM on tying dogs to the tops of Rambler wagons!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC