Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sunday, August 26th, is the 87th Anniversary of Women's Suffrage in the United States...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:14 AM
Original message
Sunday, August 26th, is the 87th Anniversary of Women's Suffrage in the United States...
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 09:55 AM by Totally Committed
Yes, we women have had the vote for under a century in this country. You'd think after "allowing" us the right to vote, the male-dominated government of the United States would have also allowed us to make a few more advances each year we proved our monthly cycle didn't hamper our sentient thought, our ability to put in a hard day's work at the outside the home and yet another upon returning there, drive, pay taxes, and vote their best interests. Rarely, if ever, do we truly vote our own best interests, or we'd be much further along than we are, but I digress.... instead we do as they "allow" us to do, which is cast our votes for the men they and the male-dominated media select for us, and the handful of women who show they can be counted on to continue all the policies of patriarchy like "one of the guys". But, there I go again, digressing... or, am I?

As I said, you'd think after "allowing" us the right to vote, we would have also been "allowed" a few more advances each year. But, if you pay attention as I have done to the state of equality between men and women in this country, you know that that is not the case at all.

In this morning's Boston Globe, there is a very thoughtful Op-Ed by Ellen Goodman on this very subject:

A year of notable setbacks for women
By Ellen Goodman | August 24, 2007

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/08/24/a_year_of_notable_setbacks_for_women/


"The Patriarch of the Year Prize goes with disappointment to US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy whose opinion restricting abortions rested on the retro notion that women needed to be protected from "regret," "grief," and "sorrow," even if it meant protecting them from their rights. We send the paternalistic justice a hook to bring him back to the 21st century."



Let me begin by saying this is no run-of-the-mill article about the erosion of women's Constitutional Right to freedom of Choice, or the moral right to control our own bodies and plan our own families. Like I said, if you're paying attention to those things as I am, you know our reproductive rights are hanging by a thread over the nearest toilet bowl, with the hands of those mostly rich old white boys we ladies help elect year after year poised to flush as soon as they hit the water.

This Op-Ed begins with the following paragraph:

"THIS SUNDAY, we will gather once more to pay homage to our foremothers by celebrating the Aug. 26 anniversary of the passage of suffrage. What a year it's been since we last met. We've seen the first woman speaker of the House, the first woman president of Harvard University, and who can forget Bill Clinton, striving to become the first 'first laddie'?"


Aside from the fact that the first female Speaker of the House has proven as big (or bigger) a disappointment as any of the men who preceded her in that job. (Proving we can be trusted with the vote, gentlemen... and we can mirror your performance, if you just give us the chance.) I know... I'm getting too snarky. Let me just put on my white gloves, extend my pinky, and move on. But, before I do, please consider if Sen.Clinton is nominated, then elected, will we really refer to Bill Clinton as "first laddie"? I doubt it.

Anyway, instead of devolving into one of those "unbearable" feminist screeds, where the author whines about silly things like equal pay for equal work or the glass ceiling present in most of corporate America or the ever pesky right to have our entire bodies unregulated by law, among all those things we pedantic, uppity feminist usually whine about. (May I just take a moment to remind you that here, in supposedly the "free-est" country on earth, we women have only had the right to vote like real people for 87 years, this coming Sunday? I'm not complaining, much, but, that's less than a century. If you don't find that astounding, don't bother reading the rest of this because you won't care.) So, instead of devolving, as I said, this Op-Ed turns into something all good patriarchal men and the women who collude with them can enjoy... a set of awards for their achievements in the area of setbacks to feminism and equality for the past year. You'll have to go and read the whole Op-Ed to see them all, but I thought I'd high-light a few here for your information. Thus, without further ado, the envelopes please:



:graybox: The Patriarch of the Year Prize goes with disappointment to US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy whose opinion restricting abortions rested on the retro notion that women needed to be protected from "regret," "grief," and "sorrow," even if it meant protecting them from their rights. We send the paternalistic justice a hook to bring him back to the 21st century.

:graybox: The Blind Justice Award is winging its way to Carson City, Nev., District Judge Bill Maddox. While sentencing a man on kiddie porn charges, he opined: "It's my understanding that most men are sexually attracted to young women. . . . I mean women from the time they're 1 all the way up until they're 100." That blindfold should be placed carefully over his mouth. So many judges, so few blindfolds.

:graybox: The Tammy Wynette Stand By Your Man Prize goes (temporarily) to Wendy Vitter, wife of family-values Senator David Vitter, who admitted to a "very serious sin in my past" after the Louisiana Republican's name was found in the D.C. Madam's black book. In a 2000 interview, Ms. Vitter said, "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary (Clinton). If he does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing and it's not alimony, trust me." Stay tuned.

:graybox: The Doctors, Doctors Everywhere Male-Practice Award goes to the former surgeon general, Richard Carmona, who belatedly confessed to toeing the White House line on abstinence-only education while knowing it was bunk. He is given a Post-it for his new life: Just Say No

:graybox: The Post-Feminist Prize goes to Money (magazine) for its financial advice on how to close the pay gap: Marry rich. Money offered an investment manual on how to be the wife -- first, second or trophy -- of a gazillionaire. They say "wear small diamond earrings." Just watch out for the prenup.

:graybox: The Our Bodies/Our Daughters Award goes to Mattel. The folks who brought you Barbie are collaborating on a new line of make-up -- for 6- to 9-year-olds. For this, they and all their ilk, were awarded a special cosmetic for the next year: egg on their face.



Just so the patriarchs of this country aren't made to feel too singled-out, there are also international Awards bestowed as well. "Comfort Women" in Japan still get no apology; Ezzat Attiya, a creative Egyptian cleric issued a fatwa saying that there was one way around the religious taboo against unmarried men and women working together. Women can breast-feed their male co-workers and legally become family; British researchers who reported that housework reduced the risk of breast cancer in women; and, to prove their progress toward gender equality, Iran, just last month stoned to death a man for adultery. But, mostly I wanted to stick to American "progress" in this post to prove I can stay "focused" while discussing an "emotional" subject like equal rights... so uncharacteristic for those of us with no Y chromosome.

This post was not meant to be anti-male, just anti-patriarchal, so to end it I would like to pay tribute to the many wonderful males who post here at DU. Most days there are relatively few of them going patriarchal all over our a**es. I appreciate that. And the many male friends I have who post here (you know who you are), you are true gentlemen and a real bunch of menches. And, to the women here, I say: Use your vote wisely by voting for the candidate who will genuinely further the causes of the things you really care about. Consider the futures of your daughters and grandaughters. Demand better representation from your Party. And, while you're at it, demand equality not just for women, but for all Americans, because we women will never be truly free until ALL Americans are.

Happy Suffrage Day! Here's to not being in the same lousy place in another 87 years!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R For Ellen Goodman and All Women
Just a bunch of Joan the Baptists, preaching in the wilderness....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another recommendation
Ellen Goodman is great.

Happy suffrage day, sisters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just as I suspected -- sinking like a stone!
;)

Okay, self-kick, so all my sisters know I wish them a Happy Suffrage Day!

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. kick
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 09:44 AM by Totally Committed


TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick


TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. We've Come a Long Way, Baby?
'Anchorwoman' pulled after one episode

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Here's news that Fox's series "Anchorwoman" wouldn't want to deliver: It's been canceled after one low-rated airing.



Lauren Jones' adventures in news didn't attract many viewers to "Anchorwoman."


The debut of the reality show about Lauren Jones' attempt to turn herself into a news anchor for a Texas TV station drew an estimated 2.7 million viewers Wednesday, according to preliminary figures from Nielsen Media Research.

That number is about a third of the viewership Fox attracted a week earlier with the finale of its popular "So You Think You Can Dance."

Jones was a Barker Beauty on "The Price Is Right," Miss New York and featured WWE Diva before the series put her into the newsroom of KYTX Channel 19 in Tyler, Texas.

Unaired episodes of "Anchorwoman" will be available on Fox's website through Fox on Demand, the network said

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/08/24/tv.fox.anchorwoman.ap/index.html


TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. hugs and kisses in remembrace of the women who died for our voting rights

and the ones jailed, beaten, and generally treated badly.

foremothers to be proud of.

I wonder if they would be proud of us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes! Here's to them!



Better yet -- I wonder what they'd think of their sons, grandsons, and great-grandsons?


TC





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. yes, that is the greater question - what of the men these last 87 yrs.


the men would take away our voting rights if they could.

believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree with you!
That's who I was referring to when I said, "sons, grandsons, and great-grandsons".

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. To all the "Iron Jawed Angels"...
who made it possible for me to be the woman I am today! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That movie makes me cry - a lot!
It's easy to take what we have for granted. It's important to know what went into the seemingly simple act of a woman walking into a voting booth and casting her own ballot.

I'm not supporting any of the candidates for President yet but the idea of a woman President is testament to all that those women went through in the early 20th Century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Great movie!
I have to watch it with a box of Kleenex in my lap, though.

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
One of the best posts I've seen yet at this site. :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I missed this!
Thank you so much. I appreciate that.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. And 87 years later we have a female running for President.

GO HILLARY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm sure that post was made in the spirit of celebration for Woman's Suffrage...
:eyes: Whatever.

I was hoping to keep the politics out of this thread, and simply celebrate all the sisters here no matter who they are voting for.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Women have come a long way.
I was just pointing that little fact out. I realize how much that may distraught you, thats just a plus for me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I'm not "distraughted", I just wanted to keep this a tribute thread,
and not have it turn into a flame-war.

Cheers!

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I agree, I didn't flame anyone.
I just pointed out a fact, then here you come rolling your eyes. I thought it was a great tribute to women having one run for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thank you.
I appreciate your participation in this thread. I'm trying to keep it non-political.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. A big kick for the women of the forum!
:applause:

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kick for something positive, fercripessake!
TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick for the evening crowd!
TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Un-fucking-believable
I'm 46, going on 47 in Dec., it's hard to believe women's right to vote was gained only 40 years before I was born. Wow, just WOW! I guess I never realized that my beautiful, smart and independent grandmothers had been born (and probably married) without the right to vote. It's hard to believe that my mother was brought up by extremely politically-astute women, who grew up without the expectation of voting. I never really realized how my life has been touched by women who were denied this basic right.

A HARD K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. It's really hard to believe, isn't it?
Only 87 years. Stunning.

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. If I could recommend it again I would!
It just boggles my mind that my grandmothers and great-aunts never really mentioned this - they came of age in the 20s and 30s. However they were all educated and opinionated women. Maybe they wanted to protect their grand-daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yeah!!
:applause: :applause: :applause: :woohoo:

Thanks for this post, TC!!

Sometimes I think in amazement what a short time it's been since women got the right to vote. And other times, I'm reminded -- because it seems we haven't come all that far.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Why, thank you, m'dear!
87 ridiculously short years... Let's hope we make SOME progress in the next 87!

BTW... you got yourself one of the really good guys, but you know that already, don't you?

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
30. You should not have to be kicking this thread by yourself.
Come on people - women's rights are eroding in this country while the "sexual revolution" radiation is creating new "rights" that do little more than push the clock back (all with cleavage showing and in heels). We can at least celebrate this right that we were "granted" and have managed to hold onto (at least for now).

WAKE UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Thanks.
I appreciate that, Katherine!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC